Model Selection, Seasonal Adjustment, Analyzing Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Model Selection, Seasonal Adjustment, Analyzing Results

Description:

Model Selection, Seasonal Adjustment, Analyzing Results Necmettin Alpay KO AK UNECE Workshop on Short-Term Statistics (STS) and Seasonal Adjustment – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: tuik4
Learn more at: https://unece.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Model Selection, Seasonal Adjustment, Analyzing Results


1
Model Selection, Seasonal Adjustment, Analyzing
Results
  • Necmettin Alpay KOÇAK
  • UNECE Workshop on Short-Term Statistics (STS)
    and Seasonal Adjustment
  • 14 17 March 2011
  • Astana, Kazakhstan

1
04.04.2016
2
Model Selection
  • Pre-treatment is the most important stage of the
    seasonal adjustment
  • X-12-ARIMA and TRAMOSEATS methods use very
    similar (nearly same) approaches to obtain the
    linearized (pre-treated) series.
  • Both method use ARIMA model for pre-treatment.
  • The most appropriate ARIMA model ? Linearized
    series of top quality

2
04.04.2016
3
ARIMA Model selection
  • zt ytßxt
  • F(B)d(B)xt?(B)at
  • (p,d,q)(P,D,Q)s ? Structure of ARIMA
  • (0,1,1)(0,1,1)4,12
  • For the model
  • Parsimonious
  • Significance of parameters
  • Smallest BIC or AIC
  • For the residuals
  • Normality
  • Lack of auto-correlation
  • Linearity
  • Randomness

3
04.04.2016
4
Diagnostics
  • Are there really any seasonal fluctations in the
    series ?
  • Seasonality test
  • If, yes
  • Diagnostics based on residuals are the core of
    the analysis.
  • If, no
  • No need to seasonal adjustment.

5
Diagnostics
  • Seasonality test
  • Friedman test
  • Kruskall-wallis test
  • Residual diagnostics
  • Normality
  • Skewness
  • Kurtosis
  • Auto-correlation
  • First and seasonal frequencies (4 or 12)
  • Linearity
  • Auto-correlation in squared residuals
  • Randomness
  • Number of sign () should be equal the number of
    sign (-) in residuals.
  • Final Comment... We select the appropriate model
    according to the state of the diagnostics.i

6
Seasonal Adjustment
  • 2.1 Choice of SA approach
  • 2.2 Consistency between raw and SA data
  • 2.3 Geographical aggregation direct versus
    indirect approach
  • 2.4 Sectoral aggregation direct versus indirect
    approach
  • (Source ESS Guidelines)

7
Choice of seasonal adjustment method
  • Most commonly used seasonal adjustment methods
  • Tramo-Seats
  • X12ARIMA
  • Tramo-Seats model-based approach based on Arima
    decomposition techniques
  • X-12-ARIMA non parametric approach based on a
    set of linear filters (moving averages)
  • Univariate or multivariate structural time series
    models
  • (Source ESS Guidelines)

8
Filtering data Difference in methods
  • X-12-ARIMA use fixed filters to obtain seasonal
    component in the series.
  • A 5-term weighted moving average (3x3 ma) is
    calculated for each month of the
    seasonal-irregular ratios (SI) to obtain
    preliminary estimates of the seasonal factors
  • Why is this 5-term moving average called a 3x3
    moving average?

9
Filtering data Difference in methods
  • TRAMOSEATS use a varying filter to obtain
    seasonal component in the series. This variation
    depends on the estimated ARIMA model of the time
    series.
  • For example, if series follows an ARIMA model
    like (0,1,1)(0,1,1), it has specific filter or it
    follows (1,1,1)(1,1,1), it has also specific
    filter. Then, estimated parameters affect the
    filters.
  • Wiener-Kolmogorov filters are used in
    TramoSeats. It fed with auto-covariance
    generating functions of the series. (more
    complicated than X-12-ARIMA)
  • But, it is easily interpreted since it has
    statistical properties.

10
Consistency between raw and SA data
  • We do not expect that the annual totals of raw
    and SA data are not equal.
  • Since calendar effect exists (working days in a
    year)
  • It is possible to force the sum (or average) of
    seasonally adjusted data over each year to equal
    the sum (or average) of the raw data, but from a
    theoretical point of view, there is no
    justification for this.
  • Do not impose the equality over the year to the
    raw and the seasonally adjusted or the calendar
    adjusted data (ESS Guidelines)

11
Direct and indirect adjustment
  • Direct seasonal adjustment is performed if all
    time series, including aggregates, are seasonally
    adjusted on an individual basis. Indirect
    seasonal adjustment is performed if the
    seasonally adjusted estimate for a time series is
    derived by combining the estimates for two or
    more directly adjusted series. The direct and
    indirect issue is relevant in different cases,
    e.g. within a system of time series estimates at
    a sector level, or aggregation of similar time
    series estimates from different geographical
    entities.

Mining and Quarrying
EU-27 Aggregate
Industrial Production Index
Germany
Manufacturing
France
Electricity, Water, Natural Gas and etc.
Spain
...
Romania
12
Analyzing result
  • Use a detailed set of graphical, descriptive,
    non-parametric and parametric criteria to
    validate the seasonal adjustment. Particular
    attention must be paid to the following suitable
    characteristics of seasonal adjustment series
  • existence of seasonality
  • absence of residual seasonality
  • absence of residual calendar effects
  • absence of an over-adjustment of seasonal and
    calendar effects
  • absence of significant and positive
    autocorrelation for seasonal lags in the
    irregular component
  • stability of the seasonal component
  • In addition, the appropriateness of the
    identified model used in the complete adjustment
    procedure should be checked using standard
    diagnostics and some additional considerations.
    An important consideration is that the number of
    outliers should be relatively small, and not
    unduly concentrated around the same period of the
    year.

13
Analyzing results
Seasonally Adjusted Series
14
Revisions to seasonal adjustment
  • Forward factors / current adjustment annual
    analysis to determine seasonal and trading day
    factors
  • Preferable for time series with constant seasonal
    factor or large irregular factor causing revision
  • Concurrent adjustment uses the data available at
    each reference period to re-estimate seasonal and
    trading day factors

15
Revisions to seasonal adjustment
  • Forecast seasonal factors for the next year
    (current adjustment)
  • Forecast seasonal factors for the next year, but
    update the forecast with new observations while
    the model and parameters stay the same
  • Forecast seasonal factors for the next year, but
    re-estimate parameters of the model with new
    observations while the model stays the same
    (partial concurrent adjustment)
  • Compute the optimal forecast at every period and
    revise the model and parameters (concurrent
    adjustment)

Sources Eurostat working paper on Seasonal
Adjustment Policy, ESS Guidelines on Seasonal
Adjustment
16
Evaluation of revision alternatives
  • The use of fixed seasonal factors can lead to
    biased results when unexpected events occur
  • Re-estimation in every calculation increases
    accuracy but also revision
  • Re-estimation once a year decreases accuracy but
    also revision
  • Re-identification usually once a year
  • However, time series revise in every release
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com