Title: Writing and Reviewing Abstracts
1Writing and Reviewing Abstracts
- Society for Epidemiologic Research Student
Caucus
2What is an abstract?
- Concise summary of a full scientific research
project describing the study and its results - Abstracts generally include the most important
aspects of the studys purpose, design, findings,
and implications
3What do I include in an abstract?
- Background and significance
- Why do we care about the problem and results?
- Include the importance of your work, challenges
in this research area, and the potential impact
of your work - Hypothesis
- What question are you trying to answer?
- What is the scope of your work?
4What do I include in an abstract?
- Methods
- How did you address your hypothesis?
- How did you collect your data?
- What analytic methods did you use?
- Results
- What are some characteristics of your data?
- Sample size
- Age range
- Racial breakdown
- What did you find?
- Report noteworthy results and findings
5What do I include in an abstract?
- Conclusions
- What are the implications of your study?
- Are the results generalizable?
- What is the take home message for the audience?
6Abstract considerations
- Stay within the word limit
- Most journals and conference submissions will not
accept abstracts that are over the word limit - Use active voice and simple sentences
- Spell out any abbreviations
- Think of key words for searches and be sure to
use them in your abstract - Have someone else review your abstract before
submission
7Example Abstracts
- Disclaimer Abstract reviews are the opinions of
the SER-SC Executive Board
8Sample 1 Home Use of Paints and Petroleum
Products and Risk of Childhood Leukemia
- Associations between childhood leukemia and
parental occupational exposures to paints,
solvents, and other petroleum products have been
reported, however, little is known about the
effect of these products when used at home. The
role of home exposures to paints and petroleum
products on the risk of childhood leukemia was
evaluated in the Northern California Childhood
Leukemia Study (NCCLS), an ongoing
population-based case-control study. The current
analyses include 382 incident leukemia cases
(aged 0-14) enrolled from 1995-2002, and matched
to 482 controls on age, sex, Hispanic status, and
maternal race. A detailed history on home use of
paints and petroleum products, time of exposure,
and user was collected during an in home
interview. Exposures were censored one year
before diagnosis. Conditional logistic regression
was performed adjusting for annual household
income. An increased risk of childhood leukemia
was observed with parental use of paints anytime
pre- or postnatally (Odds Ratio (OR)1.35, 95
Confidence Interval (CI)0.99, 2.02), with a
higher and significant risk when paints were used
during both time periods (OR1.72, 95 CI1.07,
2.74). Maternal use of paints anytime pre- or
postnatally conferred a significantly increased
leukemia risk (OR1.44, 95 CI1.03, 2.02), while
non-significant increased risks were detected for
paternal use of paint anytime before or after
birth. Exposures to paints by both parents after
birth resulted in a two-fold significant
increased risk (OR1.97, 95CI1.18, 3.30).
Subjects with acute lymphoblastic leukemia had
greater risks compared to subjects with acute
myeloblastic leukemia. No significant
associations were seen with exposure to petroleum
products across all time windows for either
parent.
9Why is sample 1 a good abstract?
- Used active voice
- Indicated the importance of their study
- Described the larger study, years of use, and
sample size - Included information on study design and matching
variables - Provided statistical methods and used appropriate
methods to analyze matched data - Described results and appropriate conclusions
- What could have improved this abstract?
- Including summary conclusions
10Sample 2 Association between body composition
and blood pressure in a contemporary cohort of
9-year old children
- Background Elevated blood pressure in children
is an early risk factor for cardiovascular
disease and is associated with body mass index
(BMI). However as BMI does not distinguish
between fat and lean, little is known about the
relationship of blood pressure in children to
different elements of body composition.
Objective This study aimed to investigate the
association of blood pressure with total body
fat, lean mass and trunk fat in a cohort of
9-year-old children. Design Blood pressure, BMI
and body composition were measured in 6, 863
children enrolled in the Avon Longitudinal Study
of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Fat mass, lean
mass and trunk fat were assessed using
dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Results
Total body fat and BMI were strongly associated
with systolic blood pressure (SBP) ß3.50, 95CI
3.27 to 3.74 mmHg/standard deviation (SD) and
ß3.96, 95CI 3.76 to 4.16 mmHg/SD, respectively
and weakly associated with diastolic blood
pressure (DBP) (ß1.39, 95 CI 1.22 to 1.57
mmHg/SD and ß1.37, 95 CI 1.22 to 1.52 mmHg/SD,
respectively). SBP was also positively associated
with lean mass (ß3.60, 95 CI 3.22 to 3.97
mmHg/SD) and trunk fat (ß2.14, 95 CI 0.82 to
3.46 mmHg/SD, independent of total fat mass).
Conclusion Blood pressure in 9-year-old children
is independently associated with fat mass and
lean mass and, to a lesser extent, trunk fat. In
this analysis, because both fat and lean mass are
associated with blood pressure, BMI predicts
blood pressure at least as well as these
components of body composition.
11Why is sample 2 a good abstract?
- Authors
- Used active voice and divided the abstract by
section - Indicated the importance of their study
- Included their study objective
- Described the study sample and measurements
- Described results
- Provided appropriate conclusions
- What could have improved this abstract?
- Description of the analytical methods
- Inclusion of methods for measure and control of
potential confounding factors
12Sample 3 A Major Determinant of Recent
Increases in HIV Incidence Among Men who Have Sex
with Men (MSM) in British Columbia (BC) Deferred
Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy
- Background Recent clinical guidelines endorse
deferral of highly active antiretroviral therapy
(HAART) until later in the course of HIV
infection. The effect of this change on
population levels of high viremia, infectivity
and, in turn, sexual transmission of HIV is
unknown. Objectives Describe populational
trends in HIV viremia among MSM in BC in relation
to a 1999 change that deferred HAART from CD4
lt500 to CD4 lt200 cells/mL. Estimate relative
increases in annual HIV diagnoses among MSM
attributable to this change. Methods Linked
provincial registries provided records of all
HAART, CD4 counts, and plasma HIV RNA viral load
(pVL) determinations from 1997-2003. We assessed
trends in MSM with high viremia (pVL gt10 000
copies/mL) across 6-month intervals. Mathematical
models predicted relative changes in infections
among MSM following introduction and deferral of
HAART. Results The number and proportion of
highly viremic MSM declined steadily from 443
(27.6) for two years following introduction of
HAART. This trend has reverted, increasing from
358 viremic MSM (17.8) in the second half of
1999 to 713 (26.7) at the end of 2003 the
increase occurred among men with CD4 gt200. Models
predicted a 50 reduction in HIV diagnoses among
MSM from 1997-1999 but rapid 83 increase
following deferral of HAART. Conclusion
Deferral of therapy appears to be a major
determinant of the 75 increase in annual HIV
diagnoses among MSM in BC from 1999-2004.
Substantial increases in HIV prevention among MSM
seem warranted.
13Why is sample 3 a good abstract?
- Authors
- Used active voice and defined acronyms
- Divided the abstract by section
- Indicated the importance of their study
- Described their objective
- Included information on their sample and study
period - Described results and methods
- What could have improved this abstract?
- Sample size information
- More detailed data collection methods
14Overall Summary of Sample Abstracts
- All abstracts were under the 250 word limit
- All authors used active voice
- Defined any acronyms used
- All abstracts included background and importance
information - Described their study population, methods, and
results - Provided appropriate conclusions for their results
15Reviewing an Abstract
16How to Review an Abstract?
- Questions to consider when reviewing an abstract
- Is the work appropriate for the journal or
conference? - At conferences, there is usually a theme or
multiple areas of science that are sought - Journals have specific aims and goals
- Is the work original?
- Is the work complete?
- Is the work ready to publish or present at a
conference? Are the results complete?
17How to Review an Abstract?
- Did the authors describe the important features
of an abstract? - Background and significance
- Hypothesis
- Methods
- Data collection methods
- Sample size and population information
- Analytic techniques
- Results
- Demographic characteristics of sample
- Significant results
- Conclusions
18Deciding Between a Poster or Oral Presentation
- If you are asked to determine what type of
acceptance an abstract should receive - Ask for guidelines from the conference organizers
- Other considerations
- What is the conference theme?
- If so, does the abstract address the theme?
- Are there special topic areas for the conference?
- If so, does the abstract address any of these
- Is the quality of the abstract above others
reviewed?
19Practice Abstract Review
20Abstract Evaluation Guidelines
- Assumptions
- Reviewing for Society for Epidemiologic Research
(SER) Conference - Areas of interest epidemiology, biostatistics,
and public health - Did the author include the important components
of an abstract - Follow the review outline provided in slides 19
and 20
21Review Sample 1 Bayesian propensity score
analysis for observational data
- Propensity scores analysis (PSA) involves
regression adjustment for the estimated
propensity scores, and the method can be used for
estimating causal effects from observational
data. However, confidence intervals may be
falsely precise because PSA ignores uncertainty
in the estimated propensity scores. We propose
Bayesian propensity score analysis (BPSA) for
observational studies which involve a binary
exposure, binary outcome and measured
confounders. The method uses hierarchical
modelling with the propensity score as a latent
variable. The first level models the
relationship between the outcome, exposure and
propensity score, while the second level models
the relationship between the propensity score and
measured confounders. Markov chain Monte Carlo
is used to study the posterior distribution of
the exposure effect. Our objective is to
implement BPSA using computer programs and
investigate the performance of BPSA compared to
PSA using Monte Carlo simulations. Synthetic
datasets, of sample size n250, 1000, 4000, were
simulated by computer for various realistic
parameter values. The datasets were analyzed
using BPSA and PSA, and we estimated the coverage
probability of 80 credible intervals. The
estimated coverage probabilities ranged from 78
to 84 for BPSA, and from 42 to 82 for PSA,
with simulation standard errors less than 2. The
simulation results indicate that BPSA provides
improved inferences for exposure effects compared
to PSA, in the sense that interval estimators
have the correct frequentist coverage levels
under repeated sampling of the data. We
demonstrate BPSA in an observational study of the
effect of statin therapy on all-cause mortality
in patients discharged from hospital following
acute myocardial infarction.
22Abstract Evaluation Review Sample 1
- Is the work appropriate for the SER conference?
- Yes this describes analytic methods that can be
used for epidemiology studies - Is the work original?
- Yes - the authors developed a more appropriate
method to calculate confidence intervals - Is the work complete?
- Yes the authors simulated data to test their
hypothesis
23Abstract Evaluation Review Sample 1
- Are the major components included?
- Background and significance?
- Yes the authors described the need for their
work and why it is important - Hypothesis?
- Yes they proposed the use of Bayesian
propensity score analysis (BPSA) for
observational studies which involve a binary
exposure, binary outcome and measured confounders - Methods?
- Yes they described how they were going to
address the hypothesis above
24Abstract Evaluation Review Sample 1
- Results?
- Yes the authors described their results and the
accuracy of their measures - Conclusions?
- Slightly unclear We demonstrate BPSA in an
observational study of the effect of statin
therapy on all-cause mortality in patients
discharged from hospital following acute
myocardial infarction. - No where else in the abstract do they mention the
use of these methods for the effect of statin
therapy - Thus, the conclusions may not be appropriate
- Overall Good abstract and would accept it and
point out concern about conclusions to authors
25Review Sample 2 Exposure to H. pylori-positive
siblings and persistence of H. pylori infection
in early childhood
- H.pylori infection is a common chronic infection,
yet transmission pathways are unclear evidence
suggests that siblings play a role in
transmission. Transient H.pylori infection is
observed in children, but determinants of
persistence are unknown. We examine the effect of
exposure to H.pylori-positive siblings on the
establishment of persistent H.pylori infection
using data from the Pasitos Cohort Study, which
recruited pregnant women from maternal-child
clinics in El Paso, Texas, and Juarez, Mexico
during 1998-2000 and followed 472 children after
birth to identify predictors of H.pylori
infection. Infection was detected at target
intervals of 6 months in index children and
younger siblings born during follow-up, using the
13C-urea breath test (UBT) corrected for
variation in CO2 production. We used proportional
hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios for
the effect of having H.pylori-positive younger
siblings on the rate of developing a persistent
H.pylori infection in index children with 1
younger siblings. Persistent infection was
defined as 3 consecutive positive UBT results. We
modeled two exposure definitions infected
younger sibling (1 younger siblings with 1
positive UBT results) persistently infected
younger sibling (1 younger siblings with a
persistent infection). Adjusting for mom's
education (the strongest H.pylori risk factor in
this cohort), the hazard ratio was 4.0 (95
CI1.8,8.2) for infected younger sibling and 9.3
(95 CI3.2,26) for persistently infected younger
sibling. Having H.pylori-positive younger
siblings, particularly with persistent infection,
was strongly associated with developing
persistent H.pylori infection in this cohort.
26Abstract Evaluation Review Sample 1
- Is the work appropriate for the SER conference?
- Yes study describes an important infectious
disease - Is the work original?
- Yes the authors are looking at an area of this
infection that is not well understood - Is the work complete?
- Yes the authors analyzed existing data to
address their question
27Abstract Evaluation Review Sample 1
- Are the major components included?
- Background and significance?
- Yes the authors described the need for their
work and why it is important - Hypothesis?
- Yes the authors examined the effect of exposure
to H.pylori-positive siblings on the
establishment of persistent H.pylori infection - Methods?
- Yes authors described their study population,
defined their study variables, and included the
analytical methods used to address the hypothesis
28Abstract Evaluation Review Sample 1
- Results?
- Yes the authors described some of their results
- However, the authors did not provide the number
of events that were included in the Cox Models - Conclusions?
- Yes authors described appropriate conclusions
for the results presented - Overall
- Good abstract
- Should be accepted for presentation at the
conference
29Resources
- Pierson DJ. How to Write an Abstract That Will Be
Accepted for Presentation at a National Meeting,
Respiratory Care, October 2004, 49(10)1206-1212 - Kiipman P. How to Write an Abstract.
http//www.ece.cmu.edu/koopman/essays/abstract.ht
ml - Sample Abstracts Obtained From
- American Journal of Epidemiology, June 1, 2006
163 (Supplement 11).
30AppendixAdditional Abstracts
31Sample A Lifetime Recreational Physical Activity
and Breast Cancer Risk
- While a number of studies have observed a reduced
risk of breast cancer with increased levels of
physical activity, these findings have been
inconsistent regarding the optimal frequency,
intensity, and timing of exercise. We performed a
population-based case-control study in
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Wisconsin. From
the states' cancer registries, we enrolled 6421
women (80 of eligible) aged 20-69 diagnosed with
invasive breast cancer between 1995 and 2000.
Controls (7683 76 of eligible) were selected at
random from lists of licensed drivers and
Medicare beneficiaries. In structured telephone
interviews, women reported lifetime history (age
14 to present) of recreational physical activity.
After adjustment for potential confounding risk
factors using logistic regression, women
averaging greater than six hours of activity per
week over their lifetime had a reduced odds ratio
(OR) of breast cancer when compared to women
reporting no recreational activity (OR 0.81, 95
CI 0.68-0.97 P trend0.20). Analyses considering
metabolic equivalents of energy expenditure (MET)
produced similar results. While an inverse
relation between physical activity averaged over
the lifetime and breast cancer risk was observed,
the relation was null when limited to activity in
a single decade. The inverse association with
lifetime activity was consistent regardless of
menopausal status and body mass however, it was
limited to women with no family history of breast
cancer (OR 0.75, 95 CI 0.61-0.91 for 6 vs. 0
hrs/week, P-interaction 0.02). The results from
this large study provide further evidence that
long-term recreational physical activity may
reduce breast cancer risk.
32Why is sample A a good abstract?
- Authors
- Used active voice
- Indicated why their study is important and
interesting - Gave a clear statement of purpose
- Included information about the selection of cases
and controls - Discussed data collection measures
- Described methods and results
- Provided appropriate conclusions
33Sample B Mapping and measuring social
disparities in premature mortality the impact
of census tract poverty within and across Boston
Neighborhoods, 1999-2001
- The documentation of health disparities is an
important function of public health surveillance.
These disparities, typically falling along lines
defined by gender, race/ethnicity, and social
class, are often visible in urban settings as
geographic disparities in health between
neighborhoods. Recognizing that premature
mortality is a powerful indicator of social
disparities in health, we undertook an analysis
of spatial variation in premature mortality in
Boston (1999-2001) across neighborhoods and
sub-neighborhoods in relation to census tract
(CT) poverty. Using a multilevel model based
framework, we estimated that the incidence of
premature mortality was 1.39 times higher (95
confidence interval 1.09-1.78) among persons
living in the most economically deprived CTs
(gt20 below poverty) compared to those in the
least impoverished tracts (lt5 below poverty). We
present maps of model-based standardized
mortality ratios that show substantial
within-neighborhood variation in premature
mortality and a sizeable decrease in spatial
variation after adjustment for CT poverty. To aid
interpretation, we also map smoothed
age-standardized rates that can be compared to
externally published rates. Additionally, we
present maps of the model-based population
attributable fraction that show that in some of
Boston's poorest neighborhoods, the proportion of
excess deaths associated with CT poverty reaches
25-30. We recommend that these methods be
incorporated into routine analyses of public
health surveillance data to highlight continuing
social disparities in premature mortality.
34Why is sample B a good abstract?
- Authors
- Used active voice and defined acronyms
- Indicated the importance of their study
- Described their objective and their analytic
strategy (spatial mapping) - Included the geographic area
- Described the maps generated
- What could have improved this abstract?
- Explanation of their results and how to interpret
the maps