PART TWO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

PART TWO

Description:

Properties such as is happy which are ascribed to only one ... The Square of Opposition Any sentence that can be symbolized with a universal quantifier ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: jame3433
Category:
Tags: part | two | properties | square

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PART TWO


1
PART TWO
  • PREDICATE LOGIC

2
Chapter Seven
  • Predicate Logic Symbolization

3
  • Predicate Logic, or Quantifier Logic, is
    concerned with the interior structure of both
    atomic and compound sentences.

4
1. Individuals and Properties
  • In atomic sentences a property is ascribed to
    some individual.
  • For example, Art is happy has the property of
    being happy ascribed to Art.
  • We can symbolize this as Ha, with the uppercase
    letter denoting the property and the lowercase
    letter denoting the individual.

5
Individuals and Properties, continued
  • Properties that hold between two or more entities
    are called relational properties.
  • Properties such as is happy which are ascribed
    to only one individual are monadic properties.

6
Individuals and Properties, continued
  • Capital letters used to denote properties are
    called property constants, and lowercase letters
    (up to an including the letter t) used to denote
    things, objects, and individual entities are
    called individual constants.
  • The lowercase variables u through z are used as
    individual variables, replaceable by individual
    constants.

7
2. Quantifiers and Free Variables
  • In predicate logic two symbols, called
    quantifiers, are used to state how many.
  • The universal quantifier is used to state that
    all entities have some property or properties.
  • The existential quantifier is used to assert that
    some individual or individuals have one or more
    properties.

8
Quantifiers and Free Variables, continued
  • In predicate logic, parentheses indicate the
    scope of a quantifier.
  • For example, the sentence Everything has mass
    and is extended is symbolized as (x)(Mx . Ex)
    (where Mx x has mass and Ex x is
    extended).
  • The parentheses around the expression (Mx . Ex)
    indicate that the scope of the (x) quantifier is
    the remaining part of the sentence.

9
Quantifiers and Free Variables, continued
  • The expression (x) (Mx . Ex) is a sentence, but
    (Mx . Ex) is a sentence form, not a sentence.
  • The expression (x)(Mx) . Ex is not a sentence as
    it contains an individual variable that is not
    quantified, the Ex.
  • Unquantified variables are called free variables.
    Quantified variables are called bound variables.

10
3. Universal Quantifiers
  • When we use the universal quantifier, (x), we are
    saying something about all the individuals
    represented by the variable in the quantifier.
  • Since few properties can be ascribed to
    everything, we might need to restrict our domain
    of discourse.

11
4. Existential Quantifiers
  • The existential quantifier (?x) is used to assert
    that some entities (at least one) have a given
    property.
  • For example, Something is heavy can be
    symbolized as (?x)Hx

12
5. Basic Predicate Logic Symbolizations
  • Sentences that begin with words such as all
    every or any can be symbolized using the
    universal quantifier.
  • (x) (Dx ? Fx)
  • Sentences of the form Some As are Bs can be
    symbolized using the existential quantifier.
  • (?x) (Dx . Fx)

13
Basic Predicate Logic Symbolizations, continued
  • Sentences of the form No As are Bs can be
    symbolized using either the existential
    quantifier
  • (?x) (Dx . Fx)
  • Or the universal quantifier
  • (x) (Dx ? Fx)

14
Basic Predicate Logic Symbolizations, continued
  • Sentences of the form Not all As are Bs can
    be symbolized using the universal quantifier
  • (x) (Dx ? Fx)
  • Or the existential quantifier
  • (?x) (Dx . Fx)

15
6. The Square of Opposition
  • Any sentence that can be symbolized with a
    universal quantifier can be symbolized with an
    existential quantifier, and vice versa.
  • A traditional way of illustrating the
    relationship between the quantifiers is known as
    the square of opposition.

16
7. Common Pitfalls in Symbolizing with Quantifiers
  • Some English expressions that look like compound
    subjects or predicates should not be symbolized
    that way.
  • Be careful with sentences that contain the word
    a or any. These sometimes operate logically
    like the particle all, but often they do not.
  • Be careful when symbolizing conjunctions!

17
8. Expansions
  • A reliable guide to translation is to compare the
    truth conditions of the ordinary language
    sentence we are translating with those of its
    translation.
  • In a universe with four individual entities (x)Fx
    would be true if (Fa . Fb) . (Fc . Fd), the
    expansion of (x) Fx with respect to that
    universe, was true.

18
Expansions, continued
  • A model universe is a domain of a small number of
    individuals about which we shall construe our
    quantified statements.

19
9. Symbolizing Only, None but, and Unless
  • Statements such as Only those who study will
    pass the test should be symbolized as (x)(Px ?
    Sx), with the universe of discourse restricted to
    the students in question.
  • Sentences such as None but the good die young
    should be symbolized as (x)(Yx ? Gx)
  • Sentences such as No one will pass the test
    unless he or she studies should be symbolized as
    (x)(Px ? Sx).

20
Key Terms
  • Bound variable
  • Domain of discourse
  • Existential quantifier
  • Expansion
  • Free variable
  • Individual constant
  • Individual variable
  • Model universe
  • Predicate logic

21
Key Terms, continued
  • Property constants
  • Quantifier
  • Relational property
  • Scope of a quantifier
  • Square of opposition
  • Substitution
  • Universal quantifier
  • Universe of discourse
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com