Performance Evaluation of Peer-to-Peer Video Streaming Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Performance Evaluation of Peer-to-Peer Video Streaming Systems

Description:

Performance Evaluation of Peer-to-Peer Video Streaming Systems Wilson, W.F. Poon The Chinese University of Hong Kong – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Vid123
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Performance Evaluation of Peer-to-Peer Video Streaming Systems


1
Performance Evaluation of Peer-to-Peer Video
Streaming Systems
  • Wilson, W.F. Poon
  • The Chinese University of Hong Kong

2
Content
  • Introduction
  • Related Works
  • System Model
  • Experimental Results
  • Conclusion

3
Introduction (1)
  • Providing video streaming services have long been
    a research topic
  • parallel server designs such as RAID
  • multicast/broadcast transmission schemes
  • distributed VoD systems
  • Tremendous growth in computer power of personal
    computers
  • peer-to-peer (p2p) systems
  • Peers contribute storage, content and bandwidth

4
Introduction (2)
  • Most of these p2p systems have been developed for
    file sharing/web caching services
  • Search mechanism
  • Storage management
  • Maximize file availability or system reliability
  • The work on p2p video streaming has not been
    thoroughly studied
  • Investigate whether such a p2p system is
    applicable to supporting video streaming
    applications
  • Distributed data storage and its impact on
    streaming performance
  • Analytical framework incorporated the effect of
    data replication and placement policies

5
P2P Streaming Systems (1)
  • One of major challenges of a p2p system
  • Peer machines may be turned on and off in an
    unpredictable manner
  • The system experiences very worse availability

6
P2P Streaming Systems (2)
  • A network has G peers in which I peers (serving
    peers) stores a set of J different videos
  • The other peers (free riders) just make requests
    but not contribute their resources
  • Assume
  • ? is the up probability of the peers
  • Tup is the mean up time duration
  • Tdown is the mean down time duration
  • Assume
  • Ni is the amount of shared storage in peer i
  • bj is the size of video j
  • qj is the request probability for video j
  • Cj is the bit rate for video j

7
P2P Streaming Systems (3)
  • nj is the number of replicas for video j, vj
  • Requests to a serving peer for vj is given by

8
System Availability
  • With full replication scheme
  • The video j is not available when all the peers
    storing vj are off-line simultaneously
  • System Availability

9
System Arrival (1)
Playback is unsuccessful if the request is blocked
rejected
peer
Availability
peer
requested video available
peer
10
System Arrival (2)
  • New requests to peer i

Vi Set of videos stored in peer i
11
System Arrival (3)
  • Assume
  • Service time (video length) follows an
    exponential distribution
  • up duration is exponentially distributed
  • Probability of requests redirected by the up
    peer

L mean video length Tup mean up time duration
12
System Arrival (4)
  • Total partially served traffic
  • Redirect requests to peer k

13
System Arrival (5)
  • where

14
System Arrival (6)
  • The equations can be represented
  • Redirect arrivals can be solved

15
System Blocking (1)
  • Unsuccessful playback
  • Proportion of requests that cannot completely
    playback the whole video
  • Assume
  • Poisson Arrival Process
  • Video length, up and down durations follow
    exponential distribution
  • States of peer i can be represented by a Markov
    Model

16
System Blocking (2)
OFF
ON/0
ON/1
ON/2
ON/K
Peers state diagram
17
System Blocking (3)
  • Since a peer will not receive any requests
    (new/redirect) in off state, the probability of
    requests blocked by a peer is equal to

18
System Blocking (4)
  • A new video request may be redirected by peers
    several times to finish the video playback
  • If either the new request or the redirected
    request is blocked, the playback is considered to
    be unsuccessful

19
Experimental Results
  • Simulation is built to verify the model
  • Randomly determine the number of replicas for
    each video (random replication)
  • Randomly store the replicas among peer (random
    placement)
  • Video popularity follows a Zipf distribution with
    parameters 0.271
  • Mean video length is 2 hours
  • Tup Tdown 10 hours
  • Measure the unsuccessful playback rate
  • Peers cannot complete the video playback

20
Results Arrival Rate
  • Number of peers1200
  • Number of videos200
  • Video length7200s

21
Results Serving Peers
  • Arrival rate0.04/s
  • Number of videos200
  • Video length7200s

22
Results Peer Availability
  • Arrival rate0.02/s
  • Number of peers1200
  • Number of videos200
  • Video length7200s

23
Replication Strategy - MinReq
  • For video streaming, a request that can be served
    requires
  • The requested video is available in the system
  • The serving peers have the available bandwidth
  • Determine the number of video replicas by
    minimizing the load of the serving peers

Minimize
Subject to
  • Optimal replication profile

24
Results Serving Peers (MinReq)
  • Arrival rate0.04/s
  • Number of videos200
  • Video length7200s
  • Peer Storage10

25
Error on Video Popularity
  • Considering an estimation error
  • Estimated popularity is used to generate the
    replication profile

26
Results Estimation Error
  • Arrival rate0.04/s
  • Number of videos200
  • Video length7200s

27
Conclusion
  • Consider the performance of a p2p system for
    video streaming services
  • Evaluate data storage and its impact on video
    streaming
  • Develop analytical framework to capture the
    properties of the system
  • Data replication
  • placement policy
  • Optimal replication scheme may not significantly
    improve the successful playback rate
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com