Title: IV.4 Signal-to-Noise Ratios
1IV.4 Signal-to-Noise Ratios
2BackgroundMotivation
- Wouldnt it be Nice to Have a Single Performance
Measure that Simultaneously Identified Factor
Settings that - Optimally target the mean
- Reduce variation
- This is the Major Motivation Underlying
Taguchis Use of Signal-to-Noise Ratios.
3BackgroundSome Popular S/N Ratios
- Taguchi proposed OVER 80 signal-to-noise (S/N)
ratios. The following three are among his most
widely applicable. Our goal is to MAXIMIZE all
three. - SNs -10 log(Sy2/n)
- What are the optimal values for yi?
- Used when smaller is better
- SNL -10 log(S(1/y2)/n)
- What are the optimal values for yi?
- Used when larger is better
- SNT 10 log(y2/s2)
- Ostensibly used when target is better
- How does SNT measure proximity to target?
4BackgroundCriticisms of Taguchis S/N Ratios
- SNs and SNL
- y will almost always be a more sensitive measure
of the size of effects on the mean - SNT
- If y and s are independent, we can look at them
separately to make better decisions - y and s are frequently directly related, a
situation SNT will not detect
5Example 6Growing an Epitaxial Layer on Silicon
WafersFigure 12 - Wafers Mounted on Susceptor
- Kacker, R. N. and Shoemaker, A. C. (1986).
Robust Design A Cost-Effective Method for
Improving Manufacturing Processes ATT Technical
Journal 65, pp.311-342.
6Example 6Growing an Epitaxial Layer on Silicon
WafersFigure 13 - Initial and Test Settings
- The response variable is thickness of epitaxial
layer in mm with a target of 14.5 mm. Which
factors will affect - mean?
- variation?
7Example 6Growing an Epitaxial Layer on Silicon
WafersFigure 14 - The Experimental Design
- Each experimental run results in 70 observations
on the response!
8Example 6Growing an Epitaxial Layer on Silicon
WafersFigure 14 - The Experimental Design
- Note that the design here is non-standard
- Can you assign factors to columns A, B, C, and D
in the 16-run signs table? - Hint the original factors A, B, C and D cannot
be used to generate the design - Which columns would the other 4 factors be
assigned to in the 16-run signs table?
9Example 6 - Analysis Using Only SNTGrowing an
Epitaxial Layer on Silicon WafersFigure 16a -
Completed Response Table
10Example 6 - Analysis Using Only SNTGrowing an
Epitaxial Layer on Silicon WafersFigure 17 -
Effects Normal Probability Plot
11Example 6 - Analysis Using Only SNTGrowing an
Epitaxial Layer on Silicon WafersInterpretation
- What factors favorable affect SNT?
- A (susceptor rotation method) set at continuous
- H (nozzle position) set at 6.
12Example 6 Analysis Using Mean and Log(s)Growing
an Epitaxial Layer on Silicon WafersFigure 18a
- Response Table for Mean
13Example 6 Analysis Using Mean and Log(s)Growing
an Epitaxial Layer on Silicon WafersFigure 19a
- Response Table for Log(s)
14Example 6 Analysis Using Mean and Log(s)Growing
an Epitaxial Layer on Silicon WafersFigure 20 -
Effects Normal Probability Plot for Mean
15Example 6 Analysis Using Mean and Log(s)Growing
an Epitaxial Layer on Silicon WafersFigure 21 -
Effects Normal Probability Plot for Log(s)
16Example 6 Analysis Using Mean and Log(s)Growing
an Epitaxial Layer on Silicon WafersInterpretati
on
- What factors affect the mean?
- D (deposition time) set at high level increases
the mean. - What factor settings favorably affect
variability? - A (susceptor rotation method) set at continuous.
- H (nozzle position) set at 6.
- D (deposition time) set at low.
17Example 6 Analysis Using Mean and Log(s)Growing
an Epitaxial Layer on Silicon WafersInterpretati
on
- Conclusions
- Set nozzle position at 6
- Use continuous susceptor rotation method
- Use deposition time to adjust mean to target