To shift or not to shift? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

To shift or not to shift?

Description:

To shift or not to shift? Towards an Urban Demand Response. AU Smart Cities Internal Symposium. Godsbanen, Remisen, Aarhus. Expansions: Comparison of cost ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: audk
Category:
Tags: sensors | shift | smart

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: To shift or not to shift?


1
To shift or not to shift?
Towards an Urban Demand Response
AU Smart Cities Internal Symposium Godsbanen,
Remisen, Aarhus
2
RES Integration
3
The SEMIAH motivation
  • Demand response potentials
  • Residential electricity consumption breakdown in
    the EU-27
  • The operation of wet appliances can be shifted in
    time without affecting user comfort.
  • Postponing the operation of a heat pump for a
    small amount of time (up to 30 min.) does not
    affect the comfort but creates a considerable
    amount of flexibility.
  • The operation of a micro CHP plant can be shifted
    in the same manner as the heat pump (shifting
    operation in time operate at partial output
    e.g., 70 or full power).
  • Hot water boilers represents an energy buffer,
    which provide flexibility to the overall power
    system.

Up to 40 of household electricity consumption
can be shifted
An aggregated demand response need many small
contributions of flexibility
(Source Eurostat)
4
The SEMIAH system
But most people confuse the concept of energy
shifting with energy reduction!
5
LOAD SCHEDULING OF THE DEMAND RESPONSE
SYSTEM (DRS)
LOAD SCHEDULING OF THE DEMAND RESPONSE
SYSTEM (DRS)
Household scenarios
Scheduler
Household scenarios
Scheduler
Input
Input
Output
Output
Demand peak flattening can be observed from the
aggregation and shifting of appliance loads in
100 residential households.
Demand peak flattening can be observed from the
aggregation and shifting of appliance loads in
100 residential households.
The DRS utilizes a centralized back-end service
to control electricity loads of home appliances.
The scheduling algorithm concerns the
shiftability and interruptability of loads. A
single-objective optimization technique is
employed by using a cost metric that combines
CO2 emission and the electricity cost. The
algorithm runs continuously in time. A Knapsack
approach is used to define the set of appliances
to run in the next time interval.
The DRS utilizes a centralized back-end service
to control electricity loads of home appliances.
The scheduling algorithm concerns the
shiftability and interruptability of loads. A
single-objective optimization technique is
employed by using a cost metric that combines
CO2 emission and the electricity cost. The
algorithm runs continuously in time. A Knapsack
approach is used to define the set of appliances
to run in the next time interval.
6
AN interdisciplinary research experiment
Grundfos Dormitory Living Lab
12 Floors 159 Apartments (40 m2)
7
Summary outlook
  • There is a need to adapt the electricity
    consumption side to cope with the fluctuations in
    generation from renewable energy sources (wind
    and PV).
  • ICT can be utilized as a cost-effective way to
    exploit flexibilities in consumption through
    Demand Response programs
  • The European research FP7 project SEMIAH
    investigates scalable demand response in
    residential households
  • The ForskEL project VPP4SGR looks at the
    integration of building automation using a
    combination of direct and in-direct electricity
    load control
  • Key challenges in demand response research user
    involvement, scalability, quality of a demand
    response, new business models trading
    flexibility.

8
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com