A quick Guide to Regional Policy

1
A quick Guide to Regional Policy

• Its origins and purpose

2
What is regional policy?

• Article 158 of the Treaty states that
• "in order to strengthen its economic and social
  cohesion, the Community shall aim at reducing
  disparities between the levels of development of
  the various regions and the backwardness of the
  least favoured regions or islands, including
  rural areas"
• also called
• cohesion policy
• structural policy
• refers to the Structural Funds
• or "EU money"!

3
Origins

• Treaty of Rome set up
• CAP
• European Social Fund
• No specific provision for regional policy or
  regional fund
• Why?
• Common market thought to be enough
• Strong economic growth in 1950s and 1960s

4
Why change?

• Recession of 1970s highlighted development gaps
• Regional disparities increased with accession of
• 1973 UK, Ireland and Denmark
• 1981 Greece
• 1986 Spain and Portugal

5
Why is regional policy important?

• Socio-economic cohesion considered to be a
  priority for the European Union
• Second most heavily funded sector in the Union
  after the Common Agricultural Policy.
• From less than 5 of 1975 budget to 35 of 1999
  budget Now moving towards 40, especially if you
  add research
• 233 billion. (approximately 160 billion)
• Visible sign of the EU
• Promotes convergence (helping poorer regions
  develop)

6
Economic Rationale

• Effects of single market on regional disparities
• Migration to rich areas not poor
• Less mobility in Europe
• Social costs

7
Political rationale

• need to legitimise the new economic and political
  order
• fiscal and monetary policy seen as not being
  enough
• "sweetener" for Member State accession

8

• Greater differences between regions and Member
  States
• regional disparity levels are higher than
  national disparities but are also falling
• Over ¼ of EU-27 population lives in regions below
  75 of EU average GDP
• 13 Member States of EU-27 have GDP below 90 of
  average 21 of population

9
EU spending 2007 - 2013
10
Regional and Cohesion Policy

• Three new objectives
• Convergence (like old Objective 1 greater scope)
  81.9
• Competitiveness (old Objective 23, tie to
  Lisbon) 15.7
• Territorial co-operation (former Interreg
  programme and RFEC networks to test ideas) 2.4

11
EU Structural Funds

• The 2007-2013 Structural and Cohesion Funds
• The European Council of December 2005 agreed a
  total Structural Funds budget of 308 billion for
  2007-13. 
• As a result of the agreement, the UK will
  continue to receive substantial Structural Funds
  receipts, amounting to 9.4 billion (2004
  prices), for 2007-13.

12
The Neighbourhood Policy of the EU

• Partners
• Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova
• Mediterranean partners Algeria, Egypt, Israel,
  Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia,
  as well as the Palestinian Authority
• inclusion of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia
• National Action Plans (3-5 years)
• Alignement with EU standards
• Co-operation on EU polices
• - Dialogue on counter-terrorism
• Participation in EU Programmes
• - Co-operation on JHA

13
Regional Policy 2007-2013
Objective 'Regional Competitiveness and
Employment Red Convergence Criteria Blue
Competitive bring in regions already over
75 Pink Statistically affected regions
14
Where are the new industries?
15
Priorities of Regional and Cohesion Policies
2007-2013
16
R and D 2000-2006-2007-2013
17
Regional Disparities in EU27 GDP per head in in
PPP (2002)
50 - 75
75 - 90
90 - 100
100 - 125
? 125
Index, EUR-27 100
18
EU Regional Policy 2000-06
40 to 49,9 of EU population (155?224 Mio.) in
eligible areas (Obj. 1 2) 233 bn. Euro (one
third of the EU budget)
19
2007-2013 - New Budget Structure Regional Policy
gains 2006 vs. 2013 in

20
Convergence-Objective Regions below 75 of EU25
GDP Average 2000-2002 86 Regions 124 million
inhabitants 27.3of EU population
Allocation EUR 177.8 bn
21
Conclusions

• Does it work?
• across Member States yes
• within Member States less
• What will enlargement do (Poland 40 million,
  Spain 40 million)
• from 15 to 25 Member States
• new Member States are much poorer
• pressure on budget
• Causes friction between member-states
• Poor vs. rich
• South vs. North
• East vs. West