Title: Hierarchies
1Hierarchies
2Critique of Individual theories
- In the last section, theorists focused on how
people come to share common understandings of a
situation - In other words, how people come to know the rules
of the game - Peoples behavior will reflect this understanding
- Once they know the rules, they will follow them
- But this approach ignores the possibility of
self-interest - Even people who know the rules might be tempted
to cheat
3Critique of Individual theories, contd
- Common language and concepts may be necessary to
produce cooperation, but they are insufficient - Cohen and Vandellos South
- Intrafamily conflict
4Critique, contd
- How then do we get people to follow the rules?
How do we get people to cooperate even when doing
so is counter to their self-interest?
5Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679)
6Hobbes question
- How is social order possible?
7Hobbes assumptions
- People have the capacity to reason
- They weigh the costs and benefits
- They consider the consequences of their actions
8Hobbes assumptions, contd
- People are self-interested
- They seek to attain what they desire
- Security (avoid death and injury)
- Reputation (status)
- Gain (possessions)
9Assumptions, contd
- Their ability to attain what they desire depends
on their power - Because men want a happy life, they seek
sufficient power to ensure that life - All men have a restless desire for power
10Assumptions, contd
- But men are equal in body and mind
- Everyone is pulled into a constant competitive
conflict for a struggle for power - Or at least to resist his powers being commanded
by others
11Assumptions, contd
- Without a power that is able to enforce rules,
people dont enjoy their interactions with each
other
12Implications
- The natural state of man is a war of all against
all (the state of nature) - People who want the same things will be enemies
- They will use all means (including force and
fraud) to attain their ends
13 Characteristics of the state of nature
- People are insecure, and live in a constant fear
of injury and death - There is no place for industry, because the fruit
of it is uncertain - Hence, no agriculture, navigation, building,
culture, science - Life is short and unpleasant
14Characteristics of the state of nature
- Nothing can be unjust
- The notions of right and wrong, justice and
injustice have no place
15 Hobbes defense of his assumptions
- The fact that people lock their doors at night
(even in the 16th century!) provides support for
Hobbes view that people are naturally inclined
to use force and fraud
16Hobbes
- People dont like the state of nature
- They therefore have a desire for social order
17 Summary of the problem of social order
- Man is a rational egoist who fears death
- His egoism ?competition and war with all others
- He is engaged in a zero-sum game
- His fear of death and desire for commodious
living ? demand for social order
18Hobbes solution
- Under these conditions, how can social order be
attained? - In the state of nature, people have liberty
- Since man is rational, he will never use his
power to harm himself - Man will try to attain peace only if he is
convinced that everyone else will do the same
19 How to make sure that everyone would seek peace?
- No use for everyone to merely agree to give up
their individual sovereignty - because men would still be rational egoists and
would renege whenever it was to their advantage - They would have to transfer them to some person
or body who could make the agreement stick - By having the authority to use the combined force
of all the contractors to hold everyone to it - Agreements alone dont have any force without
some coercive power to back them up
20 The solution surrender of sovereignty
- The only way to provide social order is for
everyone to acknowledge a perpetual sovereign
power (the state, or Leviathan) against which
each of them would be powerless - This represents a coercive solution to the
problem of social order. Due to rational egoism,
the only means of providing order is by
establishing a state that would punish would-be
miscreants.
21Hobbes Summary of causal relations and mechanisms
- Macro-level cause war of all against all
- Situational mechanism people want security
- Individual internal state desire order
- Behavioral mechanism rational egoists decide to
give up sovereignty to the state - Individual action People give up sovereignty to
the state - Transformational mechanism Aggregation
- Macro-level outcome/cause state
- Situational mechanism Individuals evaluate new
costs of deviance - Individual internal state Recognize that
deviance is costly - Behavioral mechanism Individuals want to avoid
costs - Individual action Obedience
- Transformational mechanism Aggregation
- Macro-level outcome Social order
22Hobbes Draw the theory
Social order
War of all against all
Formation of the state
Unhappy life
Individuals give up rights
Individual compliance
Costs of disobedience
23Hobbes
- How do we know if the theory has merit?
- Look at the empirical world
- For example, do societies without government have
more violence than societies with governments?
(Cooney 1997)
24Friedrich Engels
25 Engels on the state
- Like Hobbes, Engels views the state as necessary
for social order - However, the origin of the state is different
- Hobbes a world of equal individuals
- Engels a world of unequal classes
26Classes
- Defined by their relation to the means of
production - Owners
- Non-owners
- Are important because production determines
consciousness (Marx)
27Classes
- The interests of the dominant and subordinate
classes conflict - Their behavior reflects their conflicting
interests - So, societies are prone to conflict
28Classes
- The class with the most economic power becomes
the political power
29Engels How the state encourages compliance
- It represents the interests of the ruling class
as against the class made up of non-owners - Mechanism coercion, supplemented by
ideology/religion - Coercion
- Fines
- Prison
- Ideology/religion
- Makes dominance by the ruling class seem natural
30Engels How the state encourages compliance,
contd
- Example 1984
- Coercion via
- Monitoring (telescreens)
- Sanctioning
- Ideology/persuasion
- Control over information
- Ministry of truth
31Engels Draw the theory
Dominance by Powerful State
Social Order
Class Conflict
Costs of deviance, view of whats appropriate
Compliance
32Engels
- How do we know if the theory has merit?
- Look at the empirical world
- E.g. Do governments protect the interests of the
wealthy? - Do religion, education, and so forth benefit the
wealthy?
33Education (Bowles and Gintis)
- Education perpetuates inequality
- Those with wealthy, educated parents have more
years of school and are more likely to attend
college - Parental socio-economic status is a better
predictor of college attendance than the
students IQ - Children of highly educated parents do better on
standardized test scores - Less money is spent on schools that poor children
attend
34Education, contd
- Education perpetuates existing status structures
- The structure of schools corresponds to the
structure of the economic world - Role relationships replicate the hierarchical
division of labor - Students dont control curriculum content
- Rewards are external (grades) rather than
internal/intrinsic
35Education, contd
- There is a hierarchical division of types of
schools like there is for types of jobs - At work lower levels emphasize rule-following
middle levels emphasize dependability and ability
to act without supervision higher levels stress
internalization of norms - At school lower levels (junior and senior high)
limit and channel activities of students.
Community colleges have more independent
activity. Elite four year colleges even more so. - As students master each level, they either
progress to the next or are channeled into the
corresponding level in the hierarchy of
production.
36Critique of coercive theories of social order
- Hobbes cannot explain social order
- Why should rational egoists in the state of
nature ever be willing to lay down their arms and
surrender their liberty to a coercive ruler?
37Critique of coercive solutions
- Hobbes solution to the problem of order
stretches the conception of rationality beyond
its scope in the rest of the theory, to a point
where the actors come to be concerned about the
social interest rather than their individual
interests (Parsons 1937) - In the absence of normative limits on the use of
force and fraud there will be an unlimited
struggle for power - But there are no normative elements in Hobbes
(nor are these central in Marx-Engels)
38Critique of coercive solutions
- Very high levels of coercion would be required to
produce social order. But, - Coercion is expensive
- Need a cop on every corner
- A telescreen in every room (1984)
- Coercion is ethically unappealing
- Proudhons list of the domestic inconveniences
of the state
39Max Webers contributions
- 1. The concept of legitimacy
- 2. Three types of social order
40Legitimacy
- In every social order, commands will be obeyed by
a given group of individuals - To ensure this, there must be some voluntary
compliance - people must have an interest in obeying the
rules/laws - Thus, every type of social order cultivates the
belief in its legitimacy
41Legitimacy implicitly recognized in Marxism
- To forestall class conflict, the ruling class
attains intellectual hegemony by supporting - (State) churches religion the opiate of the
people - Schools
- The mass media
- In capitalism, political, military, religious,
media institutions are dependent on the ruling
class - Serve the interests of the ruling class
- Justify exploitation of the working class
- The Orwellian conclusion
- In 1984, the ruling class molds thinking, through
its control over media, language, etc.
42Legitimate orders
- Requires administrative staff to rule large
numbers of people - Staff a specialized group normally trusted to
execute policy - Every system of order
- Has a way to bind the staff to the ruler
- Has a way to bind the ruled to the ruler
43Three ideal types of social order
- Abstract models of social conditions
- Patrimonial (Traditional order)
- Rests on the belief in the sanctity of
traditions, and the legitimacy of the rulers
selected thereby - Bureaucratic (Legal order)
- Rests on the belief in the legality of enacted
rules, and the right of those elevated in
authority under such rules to issue commands - Charismatic
- Rests on devotion to the exceptional sanctity,
heroism, or exemplary character of an individual
person
44How are these types arrived at?
- By assuming what instrumental, self-interested
actors would do, if they found themselves in the
given social conditions - Weber imagines how rational egoists would behave
in these conditions
45Charismatic order
- There are no fixed rules
- Leaders make their own rules (said to come from a
higher power) - Gandhi
- Order does not depend on a continuous source of
income - Wealth not pursued in a methodical manner
- Regards as undignified all rational economic
conduct - Master and disciples must be free of ordinary
worldly attachments
46Charismatic order, contd
- Followers are not materially compensated
- They often share in the goods the leader receives
as donations - Ability of leader to provide goods sets a limit
on charismatic authority - Leaders mission must prove itself by fulfilling
the values of faithful followers (and providing
some subsistence to them)
47Patrimonial order
- Rests on the sanctity of age-old rules and powers
- Masters chosen according to these rules, obeyed
because of their traditional status - Motivational basis
- Personal loyalty
- When exercising power, the master must consider
how far he can go without inciting resistance - When resistance occurs, directed against the
master personally, not against the system as such
48Recruitment to staff
- People are recruited to a patrimonial staff
either via - Traditional ties of loyalty
- Kinsmen, slaves, dependents, clients, etc.
- Example Saddam Hussein recruits from Tikrit
- Voluntarily
- People who willingly enter into a relation of
loyalty to the leader - (Tom Hagen, the consigliere to the Corleone
family)
49Factors absent from patrimonial orders
- Clearly defined spheres of competence subject to
impersonal rules - Rationally established hierarchies
- An orderly promotion system
- Technical training as a requirement
- Fixed monetary salaries
50How are patrimonial staff compensated?
- By living from the lords table
- By allowances in kind
- By rights of land use in exchange for services
- By the appropriation of property income, fees, or
taxes - By fiefs
51A contemporary example
- Francis Ford Coppola, The Godfather, Part I
52The bureaucratic order
- Based on the rule of law
- Abstract rules established intentionally
- Law applies these general rules to specific
cases, so as to rationally pursue the
organizations interests - Office holders themselves subject to an
impersonal order - Members owe obedience to superiors not as
individuals, but only to the impersonal order - Incumbents obliged to obey only within the scope
of their job description - Members owe obedience to superiors not as
individuals, but only to the impersonal order.
53Fundamental characteristics of bureaucracy
- Official business conducted according to formal
rules - Hierarchy
- Each lower office is under the control and
supervision of a higher one - Each office has a distinct sphere of competence
- Candidates for office selected according to
technical qualifications - tested by exams, guaranteed by diplomas
- Incumbents cannot buy their offices
- Instead, staff are paid by fixed money salaries,
usually with pensions
54Bureaucracy, contd
- The office regarded as the primary occupation of
the incumbent - It constitutes a career, with a system of
promotion based on seniority, merit or both - Officials accountable to superiors for their
conduct in office - Administrative acts, decisions and rules
formulated and recorded in writing - Meetings with minutes
55Bureaucracy, contd
- Rights of individuals are protected
- This prevents the arbitrary use of power by
superiors in the service of extra-organizational
goals - Procedural justice
- The right to appeal decisions and statements of
grievances
56 Types of bureaucratic organizations
- Governments
- Armies
- Profit-making firms
- Including professional sports teams
- Universities
- Charitable organizations
57The rationale of bureaucracy
- It is the most efficient form of administration
- It is the most stable and disciplined
- Its activities are the most predictable
- It can be used to accomplish a variety of tasks.
58 Bureaucracy the modern system of authority
- Modern organizations are types of bureaucracies
- Bureaucracy -- by far the most efficient means of
administration
59The advantages of bureaucracy
- Takes advantage of the division of labor
- Based on technical knowledge
- ?greater precision, speed and objectivity in
administrative organization - Ensures that the best people are selected for
each position - Recruitment according to expertise
- Provides a basis for individual accountability
- Superiors grade performance of their subordinates
- Promotion in the career contingent on good
performance
60Advantages, contd
- Contributes to social levelling
- Meritocratic rather than particularistic
recruitment - Affinities with democracy
- High stability
- Sometimes, too stable bureaucratic inertia
- Democratic decision-making can be inefficient
61 Some disadvantages of bureaucracy
- Concentrates power in the hands of a small number
of people - Those at the top of the various hierarchies
- Slow to adapt to environmental changes
- Akin to turning around a large oil tanker
- Discourages individualism, creativity, and
risk-taking - An iron cage
62A key question
- Bureaucracy is a modern invention dates from the
late 18th century, at the earliest - Yet if it is such an efficient system of
administration, then why isnt it found
everywhere in space and time? - Answer bureaucracy has certain preconditions
that were not able to be met until modern times
63Why patrimonialism?
- What does an instrumentally rational leader do in
the absence of modern technology of communication
and exchange? - The 3 essential tasks of administration
- Recruiting an effective staff
- Motivating the staff
- Monitoring its compliance
64Comparing the two orders
Patrimonialism Bureaucracy
Recruiting Dependents Experts
Motivating (Sanctioning) No Job Security Extreme vulnerability Job Security Advancement based on performance
Monitoring Difficult Hence reliance on sanctions alone Administrative Hierarchy
65Question
- If bureaucracy is the most efficient system of
administration, why isnt it found in the Mafia?
66Weber Draw the theory
Characteristics of the authority
Social order
Individuals view ruler as legitimate
Individuals obey ruler demands
67Weber
- How do we know if the theory has merit?
- Look at the empirical world
68Paul Willis
69Willis, Learning to Labour
- Consequence of the counter-school culture poor
achievement ? placement in working-class jobs - The emergence of a counter-school culture
- lads vs. ear oles
- Conflict over dress and personal attractiveness
about the legitimacy of the school as an
institution - having a laff
70Lessons from Willis
- Legitimacy needed for cooperation, but not
predictability - The order in the working-class school is not
legitimate, yet students behave in a predictable
way - They commit everyday acts of resistance
- Consequence reproduction of the existing class
structure