Title: Germany
1A concept for better regulation in general
aviation
- Part-M Workshop Revised Part-M requirements for
aircraft not involved in commercial air
transport. - Juan Anton
2Contents of the presentation
- General presentation of the A-NPA
- Useful definitions in the context of the A-NPA
- Background
- Working method
3Contents of the presentation
- The concept state of play in general aviation
- The concept principles
- The concept description
- The concept discussion points
4Contents of the presentation
- The next steps
- Summary and conclusions
- Attachment 1
- EASA general
- Attachment 2
- The concept discussion points
5General presentation of the A-NPA
- An A-NPA is a tool to gather views before
starting actual rulemaking - A-NPA 14-2006
- Published on 16 August 2006
- Open for comments until 16 October 2006
- Structure of the A-NPA
- Main body describing the concept
- Appendix providing useful links relative to
industry standards - 5 attachments 4 Regulatory Impact Assessments
and one list of studies used.
6Useful definitions in the context of the A-NPA
- General aviation
- means all non-commercial activities of aircraft
other than complex-motor-powered aircraft - Commercial activities
- means a remunerated aeronautical activity covered
by a contract between an operator and a customer,
where the customer is not, directly or
indirectly, an owner of the aircraft used for the
purpose of this contract and the operator is not,
directly or indirectly, an employee of the
customer
7Useful definitions in the context of the A-NPA
- Complex-motor-powered aircraft means
- (i) an aeroplane
- with a maximum certificated take-off mass
exceeding 5,700kg or - with a maximum approved passenger seating
configuration of more than 9 or - certificated for operation with a minimum crew of
at least 2 pilots or - equipped with (a) turbojet engine (s) or
- (ii) a helicopter
- with a maximum certificated take-off mass
exceeding 3,175kg or - with a maximum approved passenger seating
configuration of more than 5 or - certificated for operation with a minimum crew of
at least 2 pilots or - (iii) a tilt rotor aircraft
8Useful definitions in the context of the A-NPA
- Assessment body
- means an approved body which may assess
conformity of legal or natural persons with the
rules established to ensure compliance with the
essential requirements laid down in this
Regulation and issue the related certificate. - Industry standard
- Standards established or published by an official
body whether having legal personality or not,
which are widely recognised (by consensus) by the
aviation community as constituting good practices
- Important Note
- These definitions are included into the
legislative proposal to extend the EASA scope and
were a given for the work.
9Background
- Legislative proposal to extend the EASA scope
(COM (2005) 579) - Propose the creation of a new pilot licence
- Propose general operating rules
- Contacts with general Aviation stakeholders and
National Authorities - Show that a full review of airworthiness
regulations was urgently needed.
10Working method
- A rulemaking group was set-up
- Composition Europe-Air-sport ECOGAS, IAOPA,
National Authorities and EASA - The approach taken by the group
- Brainstorming beyond the limits of conventional
approaches. - Elaborate a complete concept by proposing and
selecting options using regulatory impact
assessments and a review of relevant studies.
11The concept state of play in general aviation
- Outline of the General Aviation
- 80000 aircraft 300000 pilots excluding Annex II
- Only 25 of the USA
- Decline except micro-lights
- Stakeholders feels that there is a correlation
between heaviness of rules and level of activity - However safety regulation can not be blamed for
everything - Before embarking on relaxation of regulatory
framework, need to look at safety data
12The concept state of play in general aviation
- Safety data
- Major fatality risks are CFIT and loss of control
- Design related failures very low
- Human performance and weather are contributing
factors - Incapacitation marginal
- Third party risk not statistically
significant
13The concept state of play in general aviation
- Conventionally regulated sector versus less
regulated sector - Do not show significant difference
- CAA General Aviation regulatory review identify
some difference but recommend further study
14The concept state of play in general aviation
- Conclusion from the state of play supports a new
concept in the light of - The stagnating, difficult economic prospects of
General Aviation in Europe - The apparent growth of certain segments of
General Aviation - The nature and extent of the safety risks
- Desire of the stakeholders to ensure the
continued existence, and hopefully growth - The recognition that General Aviation forms an
important part of the lives of many European
citizens - The general drive in the European Community to
reduce the burden of regulation
15The concept principles
- Proportionality
- Level of regulation appropriate and proportionate
to risk - General aviation well informed of risk justify
lower level of regulation - Target regulation to bring greater safety
benefits - Participation
- Bringing regulation closer to stakeholders makes
them more responsible
16The concept description
- Initial Airworthiness
- No change proposed for aircraft above 2000Kg
- 3 options for aircraft below 2000Kg
- Relaxation of the current system
- Industry monitoring
- Industry monitoring with self declaration (below
750 kg)
17The concept description
- Initial Airworthiness below 2000kg
- Relaxation of the current system differences
with present system are - Design capability simplified requirements,
including the one-man organisation, to grant the
current designers privileges, - Basis for Type Certificate (TC) or Supplemental
Type Certificate (STC) approved by EASA on the
basis of a simplified Certification Specification
adopted by EASA - Approval of design changes and repairs TC or STC
holder independently of their nature (major or
minor) - Production capability simplified requirements
including the one-man organisation, to grant the
current manufacturers privileges, - Approval of Aircraft Flight Manual and
Instructions for Continuing Airworthiness TC or
STC holder - Activities relative to continuing airworthiness
of design TC or STC holder - Body issuing Airworthiness directives EASA in
consultation with TC holder
18The concept description
- Initial Airworthiness below 2000kg
- Industry monitoring it differs from the current
situation as follows - Design capability compliance with an Industry
Standard checked by an approved Assessment Body. - Basis for Type Certificate or Supplemental Type
Certificate defined by an approved designer
using an Industry Standard - Body issuing the TC approved Assessment Body
- Certification basis for changes and repairs TC
or STC holder based on Industry Standard. - Approval of design changes and repairs TC or STC
holder - Production capability compliance with an
Industry Standard checked by an approved
Assessment Body - Body issuing Airworthiness directives EASA or
EASA following recommendation of an approved
Assessment Body.
19The concept description
- Initial Airworthiness below 2000kg
- Industry monitoring with self declaration (below
750 kg) differences with the previous option
are - Body issuing the TC approved designer
- Body issuing Airworthiness directives EASA in
consultation with TC holder
20The concept description
- Continuing airworthiness and maintenance
- Adjusting Part-M to the need of aircraft other
than complex-motor-powered-aircraft - If appropriate for ease of use, such revision of
Part M could take the form of a specific stand
alone light Part M. - Creating a new level of licence for maintenance
engineers in charge with General Aviation - Establishing new privileges for approved
maintenance organisations.
21The concept description
- Continuing airworthiness and maintenance
- Adjusting Part-M?
- To extend pilot owner maintenance
- To allow the Airworthiness Review Certificate
(ARC) to be issued by organisation approved in
accordance with Part-M Subpart G (continuing
airworthiness management organisation) or by
Competent Authorities - To study the possibility of using assessment
bodies - To review the Competent Authority concept
- To review Part-M Subpart B (accountability)
- To consider the possibility to have proportionate
rules according to the mass and kind of aircraft - To develop standard modifications and repairs
(such as the Federal Aviation Administration
Advisory Circular AC 43-13) - To consider the use of industry standards
22The concept description
- Air operations
- Develop a set of light implementing rules and
acceptable means of compliance
23The concept description
- Pilot licensing
- Create a European private pilot licence issued by
Authorities or assessment bodies - covering the full scope of aircraft other founded
on a stepwise approach and on competence based
training. - This licence would be built around a basic common
licence to which ratings for different categories
of aircraft, operations and specific
authorisations would be attached, including
simplified instrument rating and instructor
rating. - No arbitrary restrictions on access to airspace
and airports built into the licensing rule. - Medical requirements based on risk assessment and
consideration to allowing general practitioners
to issue medical certificates based for example
on an assessment following a self-declaration
signed by the pilot. - Commercial flying schools should have the
possibility to train to RPPL. - Finally a bridge with the standard FCL-PPL should
be established.
24The concept discussion points
- 7 questions were asked to help defining the
follow-up of the concept. - They are detailed in Attachment 2
25The next steps
- Comment response document
- 3200 replies generating more than 7250 comments
- CRD to be published July 2007
26The next steps
- Initial Airworthiness
- MDM.032 group draft the NPA reflecting option 1
of the A-NPA Target date for NPA publication
July-August 2007 - Simplification of present Part 21 for aircraft
below 2000 Kg maximum take-off mass (MTOM) - Alternative procedures for DOA between 1000 and
2000kg - Combined design, production and maintenance
approval - European new light aircraft categories
simplified certification system for all aircraft
below 1000kg MTOM except Very Light Rotorcraft - Demonstration of capability done via
certification programme - Rely on Qualified Entities
- Simplified subpart-G for production
- Possibility to use Industry standards when found
acceptable.
27The next steps
- Continuing airworthiness
- Option 1 (adjusting Part-M and creating a new
level of licence for maintenance engineers in
charge of general aviation) seems supported - Tasks performed by another group (M.017) in close
coordination with MDM.032 - Comments received have been passed to them for
their consideration - No light Part-M but around 40 modifications to
Part-M are proposed - NPA for Part-M issued on 25 June. NPA also
include the work on pilot-owner maintenance
(M.005). - NPA for Part-66 scheduled for 3rd quarter 2007
28The next steps
- Licensing
- New private pilot licence
- Sub-group created to draft the elements for an
NPA for a New PPL aiming at initially below
2000kg (MTOM to be refined depending of aircraft
category) and addressing medical requirements in
a first phase. - In a second phase adjust requirements based on
weight criteria agreed by the legislator and
define how medical requirements are assessed. - Target date for the elements of an NPA July 2007
29The next steps
- Operations
- General operating rules
- Below 2000KG no implementing rule but direct
implementation of essential requirements except
for equipment and fuel reserves - Above 2000kg Implementing Rules (OPS-0)
- Target date for elements of an NPA July 2007
30The next steps
- Administrative actions
- Revised TOR and TOR for FCL and OPS to AGNA and
SSCC for information/ comments and ask for
nominations from AGNA and SSCC for the FCL
sub-group - TOR and composition of the groups are published
- EASA to inform the GA Community by putting a
message on the web-site - Done
31Summary and conclusions
- Comprehensive concept
- Important rulemaking activities
- Still significant amount of work to do!
- Thank you for your attention
- Questions are welcome
32Attachment 1
33EASA general
- EASA is an European Union Agency Based in Cologne
(Germany) - It is established by EU regulation 1592/2002 that
defines - Objectives principal objective is to establish
and maintain a high uniform level of civil
aviation safety in Europe - Basic principles for Aviation safety and
essential requirements to be complied by
aircraft, products and parts - A clear sharing of roles between the Agency, the
Member States and the Commission - Define the Agency and its tasks e.g. issues Type
Certificates for Aircraft.
34EASA remit
- Currently the Regulation 1592/2002 establishes
Community competency only for the regulation of
the airworthiness and environmental compatibility
of products - Work is being done to extend the scope of this
regulation to air operations and flight crew
licensing (Late 2007/early 2008 and implementing
rules end 2008/ early 2009) - Ultimately it could also cover the safety
regulation of airport operations (2011) and air
traffic control services (2012)
35EASA present regulations structure
Agency Opinion
Annex I Essential Requirements for
Airworthiness Annex II Excluded Aircraft
Basic Regulation Regulation (EC) 1592/2002 of 15
July 2002
Agency Opinion
Regulation (EC) 2042/2003 on Continuing
Airworthiness
Regulation (EC) 1702/2003 on Airworthiness and
Environmental Certification
Annex I (Part-M) Continuing Airworthiness
Requirements
Section A Technical Requirements
Section B Administrative Procedures
Section A Application Requirements
Annex II (Part-145) Maintenance Organisation
Approvals
Appendices EASA forms
Section B administrative Procedures
Annex (Part 21)
Appendices EASA forms
Annex III (Part-66) Certifying Staff
Annex IV (Part-147) Training Organisation
Requirements
Guidance Material Part 21
Certification Specifications
Agency CS , AMC GM
AMC Guidance Material Part M, 145,66,147
AMC 20 AMC 21 CS 25 CS 34 CS 36 CS E CS P CS APU
CS 22 CS 23 CS 27 CS 29 CS VLA CS VLR
CS AWO CS ETSO CS Definitions
Parliament and Council
European Commission
EASA
36Attachment 2
- The concept discussion points
37The concept discussion points
- General questions
- General balance of the concept
- Possibility to use assessment bodies
- Certificate they issue is the official
certificate - Need to be approved by EASA or Authority
- Examples already exist
- Liability issue
38The concept discussion points
- Initial airworthiness
- The Agency believe that the options called
Industry monitoring and Industry monitoring
with self declaration (below 750 kg) are more
promising - Comments welcome on which option to follow and on
in that context on weight limits
39The concept discussion points
- Continuing airworthiness and maintenance
- Additional orientations are needed on specific
points - Should assessment bodies be involved in the
oversight of continuing airworthiness, such as
ARCs renewal - What should be the role of NAAs in this field?
- Should continuing airworthiness requirements be
adapted to the size/type of aircraft? How should
this be done? - Is it worth developing standards modifications
and repairs that could be embodied without the
need for further approvals? Which bodies should
do so? - Is it possible to develop Industry Standards to
be used in continuing airworthiness processes?
Which bodies should be in charge?
40The concept discussion points
- Air operations
- Contents of light implementing rules are still
to be defined - Comments are requested on the contents of the
light implementing rules
41The concept discussion points
- Pilot Licensing
- Proposed contents and privileges are very
ambitious - Opinion of stakeholders is requested in
particular on - Type of aircraft and need for an upper limit
- Ratings that could be attached
- How to perform medical assessment and possible
role of general practitioners.
42The concept discussion points
- Scope of common rule
- In COM (2005) 579 the Commission expressed the
view - that consideration should be given to aircraft
with a low maximum take-off mass, with increased
performance might be better regulated at
Community level. - No proposals to change Annex II at this stage
- Comments are requested on the possibility to
remove certain aircraft from Annex II if the
proposed concepts were implemented.