Title: A Doll
1A Dolls House
35
2Introduction
- A Dolls House premiered on December 21, 1879 in
Copenhagen, Denmark. - Two weeks before the production, A Dolls House
was printed in book form and sold 8,000 copies
within two weeks. - A Dolls House was a hit in Scandinavian
countries, but it would not be produced in other
parts of Europe until two years after its
premiere. - A Dolls House opened in London in 1889 after a
ban against its production had been lifted. It
opened in New York in 1894. - The play was adapted for film several times. The
two most famous were both released in 1972. One
directed by Joseph Losey, starring Jane Fonda,
David Warner, and Trevor Howard, and the other
directed by Patrick Garland, starring Claire
Bloom, Anthony Hopkins, and Ralph Richardson.
3Controversy
- When it was first staged, A Dolls House was
controversial, even scandalous, as it questioned
the conventional roles of the husband and wife in
the sacred institution of marriage, arguing, it
seemed, for the liberation of women. - Many saw Noras act of leaving her family as a
selfish abandonment of her duties as wife and
mother. - Others argued that her embarkation on a journey
of self-discovery would not only make her a more
independent and stronger individual but also a
better mother. - Ibsen said that he was arguing not for womens
rights but for justice for all humanity. - For the plays German debut, Ibsen was forced to
write an alternative ending, one in which Nora
looks at her children before she is about to
leave, collapses to the floor, and decides to
remain. Ibsen later called the ending a
barbaric outrage.
4The Author Henrik Ibsen
- Henrik Ibsen was born in Skien, Norway,
- a small town, in 1828.
- His childhood was not easy. The family became
- impoverished when he was six and the family
business - failed. His father became depressed and
alcoholic. - Eventually, his mother left his father.
- As a teenager, he worked as an apprentice to an
apothecary and considered studying medicine.
Instead, he decided to devote himself to writing
and working in the theater.
- By his early twenties, Ibsen earned a living by
writing and directing plays in various Norwegian
cities. He became the director of the Norwegian
Theatre in Bergen, Norways second largest city.
5Ibsen continued
- In 1858, he became the creative director at the
National Theater in Christiania (later, renamed
Oslo). He married a year later. - He once told a friend that to understand him one
needed to understand the severe northern
Norwegian landscape, in which the winters left
people isolated and inclined to introspection and
perhaps brooding. Many thought Ibsen cold and
aloof.
Henrik Ibsens home in Norway
- In 1864, Ibsen left Norway for virtually a
twenty-seven year exile. However, all his plays
would be set in Norway.
6Ibsen continued
- He once commented, Never have I seen my homeland
so fully, so clearly, and at such close range, as
I did in my absence when I was far away from it. - Ibsen returned permanently to Norway 1891, where
he was celebrated as a national treasure,
honored by theater-goers, scholars, and royalty.
He had been the first Norwegian author to gain
widespread acclaim outside his native country. - Ibsens health deteriorated after a series of
strokes in 1900. He died in 1906, leaving a
profound mark on the world theater.
7After Shakespeare, without hesitation, I put
Ibsen first. - Luigi Pirandello
(1867-1936), Italian dramatist and
novelist and the winner of the Nobel
Prize in Literature in 1934.
8Ibsens as Dramatist
- While his reputation might have waned over the
years, Ibsens achievement is still widely
acclaimed. His plays continue to be performed,
read, celebrated, and discussed. - Ibsen was a prolific playwright who wrote
histories (Emperor and Galilean, 1873, e.g.),
verse dramas (Peer Gynt, 1867), experimental
dramas (The Master Builder, 1892), philosophical
dramas (When We Dead Awaken, 1899), and more. - However, he is best known for his plays of social
commentary and psychological realism, like A
Dolls House, Ghosts (1881), An Enemy of the
People (1882), The Wild Duck (1894), and Hedda
Gabler (1890), among others. - Through these and other plays, his influence on
the development of the modern theater cannot be
underestimated. He has been referred to as the
Father of Modern Drama.
Title page in the manuscript of When We Dead
Awaken
Title page in the manuscript of Ghosts
Title page in the manuscript of Hedda Gabler
Title page in the manuscript of The Master
Builder
9Realism in the Theater
- The movement toward Realism in the theater began
in Europe in the second half of the nineteenth
century through playwrights like Ibsen, August
Strindberg, and George Bernard Shaw. A Dolls
House played a significant role in the movement.
Realism reached America later, finding its
fullest expression in Eugene ONeill. - Realism began as a reaction to the excessively
contrived, sentimental, and didactic melodramas
that dominated drama in nineteenth-century Europe
and America. - Realists take a mimetic approach to theater,
striving to create the illusion of everyday life
on stage, with the audiences eavesdropping on a
slice of life. - Realists tend to depict the middle, lower, and
lower-middle classes their work, family life,
language, dress, and problems.
10Realism in the Theater continued
- Realists prefer contemporary settings.
- In a direct response to melodrama, realists
strive to create complex characters, to make
internal conflict as dramatic as external
conflict. - They prefer the open ending, which does not
resolve all the plays questions and sometimes
leaves in doubt the future of the protagonist.
The resolution or denouement is generally short
in realistic dramas and virtually non-existent
sometimes. Do we know, for instance, what
happens to Nora once she leaves her home?
11Well-Made Play
- While Ibsens use of realist techniques and his
frank discussion of social issues were
innovative, he drew his form for A Dolls House
and other plays from the nineteenth-century
well-made play. - The well-made play is a carefully crafted work,
neat in structure and obviously contrived in its
numerous plot twists and turns. - The emphasis is on plot not character
development. The first act of a well-made play
introduces the problem the second act
complicates it, and the third resolves it.
12Well-Made Play continued
- The characters tend to be types, the overly
concerned parent, the straying child, the corrupt
businessman. Characters are uncomplicated and
easily identified as hero and villain, good guy
and bad guy. - The well-made play relies on standard devices
exposition conveyed through gossipy servants,
plot complications from lost or forged documents,
and resolutions from the entrance of an absent
family member or the recovery of letters and
documents. - The most famous author of well-made plays was
Eugène Scribe (1791-1861) who wrote hundreds of
plays, several of which Ibsen directed.
13 Ibsen as Individualist
- While his politics and radicalism were
indefinite, Ibsen was a staunch advocate for
individual freedoms and rights. I think that
all of us have nothing other or better to do than
in spirit and sincerity to realize ourselves.
That, to my mind, is the real liberalism. - He once said that the state is the curse of the
individual.
14Ibsen and Writing Plays
- Always I proceed from the individual the
stage-setting, the dramatic ensemble, all that
comes naturally and causes me no worry, once I
feel sure of the individual in every aspect of
his humanity. I must penetrate to the last
wrinkle of his soul. - Ibsen made at least three major drafts of his
plays. In the first, he said that he knew the
characters like people on a railway journey in
the second, he knew them as one knows someone
after four weeks at the same spa, and in the
third, as intimate friends.
Henrik Ibsen paa Verdens-Theatret 1898
Caricature by Alfred Schmidt in Hver 8. Dag.
15Marriage in A Dolls House
- A Dolls House raises many questions about the
institution of marriage, questions which many
nineteenth-century audiences found disturbing. - In the opening scene, Torvald treats his wife as
a child, addressing her with nauseating pet
names, forbidding her sweets, and educating her,
so he thinks, with moralistic platitudes No
debt, no borrowing. There can be no freedom or
beauty about a home life that depends on
borrowing and debt. -
- Soon afterwards, we see that Nora is not as
submissive as Helmer thinks or as we first
thought She lies to him about eating candy and
she keeps secrets. What does this suggest about
Nora? - What is your impression of the Helmer marriage
after Act One? - Does your impression change as the play proceeds?
Why or why not? - The play suggests that marriage should be
conceived as a partnership of equals.
16Nora Helmer
- At first, Nora appears to be a conventional,
nineteenth-century middle-class housewife. She
cares for her children and buys them gender
conventional Christmas presents, supervises the
running of the home, and accepts her husbands
authority. Willingly subservient to her husband,
she accepts his seemingly demeaning pet names for
her. - Soon, however, we realize that Nora holds
secrets, that she lies to her husband, and that
she is capable of manipulating him. Nora commits
minor acts of subversion that foreshadow her much
larger rebellion at the end of the play. - In Act One, we discover that Nora is capable of
great courage, sacrifice, responsibility, and
decisiveness. She saved her husbands life
through forgery, using the money for a necessary
trip to the warmer climates of Italy. She has
worked diligently to repay the loan. - Through the forgery, Ibsen raises a question with
social implication Why couldnt Nora or a woman
in her position secure a legal loan? - Similarly, why does Nora not have a key to the
familys mailbox?
17Nora continued
- After Torvalds response to her forgery, Nora
transforms. No longer a flighty, submissive
housewife or a panicky suicidal criminal, she
becomes coldly rational, perceptive, defiant,
and, perhaps most importantly, autonomous.
- Shaped by first her father and then her husband,
Nora has developed according to their image and
precepts, which follow social convention. Nora
has been more of a doll or a puppet than an
individual. - Nora realizes that she must venture on a journey
of self-discovery. To be a good mother, she must
first establish her own identity and
individuality. - Noras decision to leave represents a triumph of
the individual over social convention and a
personal past. - Do you consider Noras action at the end to be
brave? Necessary? Selfish? Cruel?
18Does Nora return to her family?
- Ibsen was asked several times. Once, he said,
Certainly, she does. - But, on another occasion, he responded, How do I
know? It is possible that she returns to her
husband and children, but also possible that she
becomes an artiste in a traveling circus. - The play, of course, keeps the ending open. We
cannot say with any certainty what the future
holds for Nora or her family.
19Torvald Helmer
- Torvald is not an attractive character. He is
domineering, egocentric, condescending, arrogant,
and thrifty. He may be successful at work, but
he is also moralistic, explosive, and
status-conscious. - Torvald does not change by the end of the play,
but he does seem capable of changing in the near
future. He understands that Nora has just left
him, a possibility he could not have imagined
until it occurred. - Noras leaving has jolted Torvald and could lead
to his transformation. Significantly, he repeats
her phrase (the most wonderful thing of all)
for his closing words, suggesting that he has not
ignored what she has said and that he will
consider her words seriously. This holds out the
possibility of change.
20Secondary Characters
- Most of the secondary characters are functional.
Krogstad, for instance, is the agent of the
necessary conflict between Nora and Torvald. He
has committed the same crime as Nora and has
lived the kind of humiliation exposure will bring
her. He becomes transformed by love, perhaps
suggesting a possibility for Torvalds and Noras
transformations if their love for one another is
genuine.
- Mrs. Lindes functions are also clear
- - She brings out exposition concerning Noras
efforts to save her husbands life. -
- - As an independent woman who has struggled to
survive, she serves as a foil and model for Nora. -
- - She is responsible for the climax of the play
and the surfacing of the truth as she stops
Krogstad from retrieving his letter. - - She points out the theme concerning the need
for honesty and openness in marriage they
must have a complete understanding between them,
which is impossible with all this concealment and
falsehood going on.
21Themes
- The two major themes of A Dolls House might be
stated as, -
- 1. The restraints imposed on individual
development and self-fulfillment by societys
conventions. -
- 2. The effects on individual development of our
pasts (including the influence of parents,
upbringing, and genetic inheritance).
22The Influence of the Past on the Present
- Ibsen works out different facets of this theme
through his characters. Dr. Rank, for instance,
has his life cut short as he pays for the sins of
his father. Rank inherited venereal disease from
his father yes, an impossibility, but in
Ibsens time many thought the disease could be
inherited. - Noras father encouraged her to remain a little
person, passing her from his home to her
husbands. More importantly perhaps, she has
inherited her fathers want of principle, as
Torvald calls it No religion, no morality, no
sense of duty. Of course, her and her fathers
want of principle might not be so corrupt. We
do not know her fathers motivation, but Noras
forgery saved Torvalds life. - The poor health of Mrs. Lindes mother forced the
daughter into an undesirable marriage that
redirected her life. In addition, because of
years spent caring for her mother, Mrs. Linde has
developed a desperate need to be needed, a need
to take care of others.
23The Past continued
- Krogstad is aware of how his reputation affects
his children My sons are growing up for their
sake I must try and win back as much respect as I
can in this town. Torvald takes an extreme view
of Krogstads effect on his children, believing
his moral breakdown is infectious Each breath
the children take in such a house is full of
germs of evil. - While we do not hear about his parents or his
upbringing, Torvald makes some strong statements
about the moral influence of parents on children
Almost everyone who has gone to the bad early
in life has had a deceitful mother. When he
learns of Noras forgery, Torvald works out a
plan for his wife to live in the house, but she
must not see the children I dare not trust them
to you. - Since Torvald is hardly an admirable character,
how should we interpret his comments? Do you
think Ibsen intends for us to consider them as
truths?
24Symbols
- Ibsen uses several symbols in A Dolls House to
reveal character, to foreshadow events, and to
create drama and suspense - Christmas tree the tree sets the time of year, a
time of happiness and birth, a birth of a new
Nora occurs at the end of the play. Like the
tree, Nora is little more than a decoration in
her own home. - Macaroons signifies a small rebellion that
foreshadows Noras larger rebellion at plays
end. Eating the macaroons and lying about them
give Nora a sense of power over Torvald the
macaroons are a small representation of her
larger secret. Note the following lines from
Nora Its perfectly glorious to think that we
have that Torvald has so much power over so
many people. Dr. Rank, what do you say to a
macaroon? - Mending/knitting Mrs. Linde does the mending of
Noras costume, but more significantly she mends
Noras life by allowing the truth about the loan
to surface. She also mends Krogstads life when
she declares her love for him.
25Symbols continued
- Black Crosses Rank uses two crosses to announce
his death. One, however, symbolizes the death of
an old Nora. The cross might also tie in with
the theme of human liberation, as individuals all
bear cultural, societal, and parental influences
or crosses that sometimes need to be lifted
before liberation into individuality. - Tarantella a frantic dance, which Nora dances
as if her life depended on it. It is a
parting gift for her husband, for whom she plans
on committing suicide, rather than let him assume
the blame for her criminal act. With its
ferocious energy, Noras tarantella reflects her
agitated state of mind. - Title The title suggests that all the
characters are puppets playing conventional roles
with little free will. They are more like dolls
or puppets than individuals.
26For Further Consideration
- Who is the villain in the play? (Torvald is too
simple a response.) Explain. - Does Nora make the right decision to leave her
family? Why or why not? - Discuss the significance of the title. How would
you, as a scenic designer, stage the play to take
maximum advantage of the symbolism implied by the
image? - Some critics have contended that the play is
outdated. That the womens liberation movement
of the twentieth century has provided more
options for women. Do you agree that the play is
outdated? Why or why not? - Interpret the events in the play from the point
of view of one of the Helmer children who is now
an adult looking back at this significant time in
his/her childhood. - Write a review of one of the film adaptations of
A Doll House. Consider the actress playing Nora.
Did she present a different Nora than you
expected? Consider other character portrayals
and issues. For instance, how effective were the
liberties that the film takes with Ibsens text?