Steve Onyeiwu - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Steve Onyeiwu

Description:

Determinants of Income Poverty in Rural Africa: A Comparative Study of Kenya and Nigeria Steve Onyeiwu Jialu Liu Department of Economics, Allegheny College, Meadville ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Chou151
Category:
Tags: farming | onyeiwu | steve | urban

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Steve Onyeiwu


1
Determinants of Income Poverty in Rural Africa A
Comparative Study of Kenya and Nigeria
  • Steve Onyeiwu
  • Jialu Liu
  • Department of Economics, Allegheny College,
    Meadville, Pennsylvania, USA

2
Motivation
  • Questions About Africa the Millennium
    Development Goals
  • The Debate Over Growth and Aid (Jeff Sachs Versus
    Bill Easterly)
  • Aid Fatigue Billions of in Aid Yet High
    Poverty Rates
  • Impressive Growth Rates,High Incidence of
    Poverty and Inequality
  • Poverty More Severe in Rural African Villages
    (Rural-Urban Migration Urban Congestion/Slums)
  • Beyond Growth and Aid Enhancing the
    Income-Earning Capacities of Rural Households
    Amartya Sen (1989)

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Goals and objectives
  • What Determines the Income-Earning Capabilities
    of African Rural Dwellers?
  • Analysis of Surveys in Kenya and Nigeria to Gain
    Insight into Socio-Economic Demographic
    Characteristics of Rural Households in Africa
  • Comparison of Rural Households in Kenya and
    Nigeria ---are Africans Really Heterogeneous?
  • Use of Panel and Cross-Sectional Regressions on
    Survey Data to identify the Determinants of
    Income
  • Explore Policy Implications for Poverty
    Alleviation

7
Literature review
  • Lack of Productive Assets as a Major Constraint
    but Controversy About Most Important Assets
  • Mehrotra and Delamonica (2007) Excess Labor
    Supply, then Land is an Important Asset that
    Determines Income Level. Rural poverty in East
    and Southern Africa attributable to concentration
    of landholdings. White Farmers in Zimbabwe
    Absentee Landowners
  • Krishna and Shariff (2011) Distinction between
    assets that prevent households from falling into
    poverty, and those that help them get out of
    poverty. Land ownership can help avoid falling
    into poverty, but cant extricate from poverty.
    Proximity to a city is key for alleviating
    poverty. Non-agricultural sources of income key
    to poverty alleviation

8
Literature review (cont.)
  • Khandker and Koolwall (2010) Proximity to an
    urban area is key to higher income and poverty
    alleviation
  • Alarya, et al. (2011) Irrigated agriculture and
    non-farm activities are more important than
    livestock ownership.
  • Income Diversification Salience of Non-Farm
    Sources of Income (Turner, et al. (2011),
    Haggblade and Reardon (2010)
  • Critics of Income Diversification----Rural
    Dependency Bryceson (2004), Eastwood (2006)
  • Our Contributions to Literature use of a
    theoretical model, surveys and econometrics to
    investigate the salience of farm and nonfarm
    sources of income for the rural poor
  • Offer Insights Regarding Why Growth Has Not Been
    Poverty-Alleviating in Rural Africa

9
Theoretical model
  • Each household spends an optimal amount of time u
    working on farm, and the rest on non-farm work.
  • y the household income
  • h human capital
  • l labor
  • z land
  • k productive capital and livestock

10
Theoretical model
  • For households with no productive capital (k0)
    and human capital (h0)
  • ? they choose u1 (100 time in the farm sector)
  • Their per capita income is

11
Theoretical model
  • For household with some productive and human
    capital (kgt0, hgt0)
  • They choose
  • Their per capita income becomes

12
Empirical model
  • log(yi/li) is the logarithm of per capita
    household income.
  • di is a vector including household size, the
    average age of adult family members, proportion
    of female family members, farm labour,
    non-working family members, disabled members, and
    students.
  • hi is a proxy for average education level of the
    household.
  • zi represents land holding and land value.
  • ki is a vector of livestock and production assets.

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Conclusions
  • Non-Farm Activities are More Important than
    Farming as Income Sources
  • Occupational Specialization Exacerbates Poverty
    diversification is good for households.
  • Sub-optimal investment in human capital by rural
    households explains the weak link between growth
    and poverty alleviation. It also explains rural
    inequality.

25
Conclusions (cont.)
  • Investment in Education Enhances Opportunities
    for Non-Farm Income
  • To Reduce Feminization of Poverty, Education
    Should be Targeted at Women
  • Intensify Efforts to Reduce Fertility Rates
  • Cultural Attitudes to Women Education and
    Fertility Need to Change
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com