Esprit Project N

1

• Esprit Project N 28953Interpretation of
  Symbolic Objects in 3D representation
• (ISO-3D)Kick-Off Meeting

2
Objective

• To develop a Human Centred Interface methodology
  and tools which offer a way to analyse and
  interpret business information from large
  collection of data.

3
Consortium organisation
MSI (F) Prime
4
Consortium detail

• Name
• Matra Systèmes Information (MSI)
• Country
• France
• Position in the consortium
• Prime (Coordinator)
• Part in the consortium
• Ergonomics and methodology

5
Consortium detail

• Name
• University of Namur (FUNDP)
• Country
• Belgium
• Position in the consortium
• Technical leader (Contractor)
• Part in the consortium
• 3D Visualisation and Sound

6
Consortium detail

• Name
• University of Naple (DMS)
• Country
• Italy
• Position in the consortium
• End User Technical Provider (Contractor)
• Part in the consortium
• DM design, 3D Visualisation and RAI requirements

7
Consortium detail

• Name
• ING Bank (ING)
• Country
• Netherlands
• Position in the consortium
• End User (Contractor)
• Part in the consortium
• Stock market requirements

8
Consortium detail

• Name
• TGS Europe (TGS)
• Country
• France
• Position in the consortium
• Dissemination leader (Contractor)
• Part in the consortium
• 3D library tool provider

9
Consortium detail

• Name
• University PARIS IX Dauphine (CEREMADE)
• Country
• France
• Position in the consortium
• Technical Provider (Subcontractor)
• Part in the consortium
• DM design, DM interpretation and 3D Visualisation
  

10
Consortium detail

• Name
• University of Ljubljana (IMPM)
• Country
• Slovenia
• Position in the consortium
• Technical Provider (Subcontractor)
• Part in the consortium
• 3D time series visualisation

11
Consortium detail

• Name
• (CISIA)
• Country
• France
• Position in the consortium
• Data Mining Tool Provider (Subcontractor)
• Part in the consortium
• DM data analysis expertise

12
Work packages

• WP1 Project management (MSI)
• WP2 ISO-3D specification (DMS)
• WP3 ISO-3D methodology tools (FUNDP)
• WP4 Project evaluation (ING)
• WP5 Exploitation dissemination (TGS)

13
WP1 Project Management (MSI)

• T1.1 Administrative management (MSI)
• Coordination between partners communication
  with Commission
• T1.2 Technical management (FUNDP)
• Coordination of technical work and software
  development and integration

14
WP2 ISO-3D specification (DMS)

• T2.1 End user requirements (ING)
• Definition of the scope of two pilot applications
• T2.2 State of the art (MSI)
• Analysis of technology and methodology background
• T2.3 Symbolic object generation (DMS)
• Generation of symbolic object, especially time
  representation in SO

15
WP3 ISO-3D methodology tools (FUNDP)

• T3.1 Symbolic object interpretation design
  (DMS)
• Definition of symbolic object interpretation
• T3.2 Source code specification (TGS)
• Definition of all development normalisation
  aspects (programmation rules, module interfaces,
  integration code design)
• T3.3 ISO-3D graphical library (FUNDP)
• Development of the graphic and sound library

16
WP3 ISO-3D methodology tools (FUNDP)

• T3.4 Methodology (MSI)
• Definition of a formal methodology based on
  ergonomics feature
• T3.5 Software methodology (MSI)
• Development of a tool supporting the methodology
• T3.6 Tool set integration (FUNDP)
• Integration of the graphic library, the analysis
  process, the methodology software the DM tool

17
WP4 Project evaluation (ING)

• T4.1 Pilot application (MSI)
• Development of two pilot applications (for ING
  and for RAI/DMS)
• T4.2 Benchmark method (ING)
• Criteria definition for the pilot applications
  evaluation
• T4.3 Project result evaluation (ING)
• Evaluation of the pilot applications

18
WP5 Exploitation Dissemination (TGS)

• Definition of the falling of the project in terms
  of market potential, potential other users
  outside the consortium, dissemination means
• Exploitation plan at Month 3

19
Planning (1/2)
20
Planning (2/2)
21
Effort
22
Budget (in Ecu)
Advance 220000 ltgt 27,16
23
Discussion
24
Lunch
25
Project Organisation

• Project management meeting each 3 months (or
  more if necessary) gt 8 meetings
• Technical management at the same time call
  meeting each two weeks

26
Project Organisation

• Pack Office Version office pro 97 (to discuss)
• Web site (to discuss)
• Documentation validation process (to discuss)
• Quality plan (to discuss)

27
Six Months Work
Project Plan (WP1) MSI T0 User Requirements
(WP2) ING T03 Exploitation
Plan (WP5) TGS T03 State of the
art (WP2) MSI T06 SO Generation (WP2) DMS
T06 Cost Statement All T06 Technical
Progress Report All T06
28
Actions
and
Conclusion
29
Good By I wish you a good back journey See you
next time