Title: Aristotle
1Aristotles Aesthetics (382-322 BC)
-
- Welcome to Aristotle!
- Western thoughts
- first structural
- textual critic of
- the Fine Arts!
2Aristotles Aesthetics (382-322 BC)All men by
nature to desire to know.the human race lives
also by art and reasonings Metaphysics 11.
- Aristotle produced the first
- extended study of an art form.
- The Poetics is the primary
- resource for Aristotles view
- of art.
- Poetics is a reply to Platos
- condemnation of Poetry.
3Introduction
- In terms of literary analysis, in the
- Poetics, Aristotle moves back
- Forth between criticism and theory.
- He wrote Poetics in our after 334.
- We only have Book I Book II on
- comedy is lost.
4Introduction
- The Poetics can be somewhat perplexing.
Therefore, it is helpful to keeping in mind the
following guiding questions - What is poetry?
- What kind of poetry is tragedy?
- What are tragedys essential elements?
5 Discourse Outline of Aristotles Poetics
Unifying theme is Mimesis Imitation is
representation
- I. Introduction (Poetics 1-5)
- A. General Notion of Artistic imitation (1)
- B. Different Species of Artistic Imitation (2-3)
- C. The Development of Poetry (4-5)
- II. Tragedy (Poetics 6-22)
- A. Definition and description (6)
- B. Discussion of Plot (7-18)
- C. Discussion on thought (19)
- D. Discussion on diction (20-22)
- III. Epic (Poetics 23-24)
- A. Discussion of Merits of Tragedy Epic
(26).
6Introduction
- If you recall, Plato wanted to ban poetry for the
following reasons - No knowledge undergirds poetry for poets are
ignorant (Apology 22b-c on 543a) - Poetry relies on inspiration (Ion 534b-e
Phaedrus, 245a) rather than reason - Poetry propagates falsehoods (Republic 337-391)
7Introduction
- Poetry arouses irrational passions that displaces
reason it is intoxicating with its seductive
charms of rhythm, meter, and harmony (Book 10) - Poetry imitates appearance and not reality
it is a lower-level metaphysic (mimesis) (Book
10) - Poetry imitates the souls worst impulses from
its better ones (Republic 605) - Poetry should be banned if it cannot be justified
by reason (Republic 2-4 10)
8Pertinent Statement 1449b24-28
- The fundamental aspects of Aristotles argument
appears in his definition of tragedy - A tragedy, then, is the imitation of an action
that is serious and also, as having magnitude,
complete in itself in language with pleasurable
accessories, each kind brought in separately in
the parts of the work in a dramatic, not in a
narrative form with incidences arousing pity and
fear, wherewith to accomplish its catharsis of
such emotions. Here, by language with
pleasurable accessories I mean that with rhythm
and harmony and by the kinds separately I mean
that some portions are worked out with verse
only, and others in turn with song. Poetics,
1449b24-28.
9Important Words to Consider from 1449b24-28I am
indebted to Nickolas Pappas article, Aristotle
in The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, 15-26
for this discussion.
- We will now proceed to consider some of the more
weighty words of that statement which will be
used to present the thesis of this book - Catharsis
- Mimesis
- Action
- Seriousness.
- Lets proceed to consider all four words!
10First Word is Catharsis
- This word occurs twice in what we have of the
Poetics. - No definition is given of the word.
- Closing place for stating a purpose or goal is at
the end of a sentence that is where catharsis
is located in 1449b24-28 - wherewith to accomplish its catharsis of such
emotions.
11Catharsis
- Three possible definitions with the first two
being psychological and the last being literary - Catharsis refers to the purging the emotions
- Catharsis refers to the clarification or
calibration of the emotions - Catharsis refers to the incidents in the drama
(coherent and significant plot structures in the
goal of tragedy).
12Catharsis Three interpretations
- Word also occurs in Politics VIII where mentions
the catharsis that music and poetry deliver. - Interpreters of Catharsis have extensively
debated this word. - Before Aristotles use catharsis was used in a
number of ways including the following - Medical catharsis was a purgation (e.g, laxative
or enema cleaning out the digestive system) - Clean up or clarification.
13Catharsis Release of emotion
- Since 19th Century Aristotelian catharsis tended
to receive a medical reading. Nickolas Pappas
elaborates on this interpretation - Tragedy flushes out unruly and undesirable
passions by letting them flow freely until we
return to an unemotional state. The terror
aroused by a well-made tragedy lets us release
the thousand little terrors we normally swallow
back down (pg. 17).
14Catharsis Release of emotion
- A.E. Taylor states it this way
- Aristotle has a theory which is directly aimed
against this overstrained Puritanism referring
to Platos suppression of fine arts. He holds
that the very exciting and sensational art which
would be very bad as a daily food may be very
useful as an occasional medicine for the soul.
He would retain even the most sensational forms
of music on the account for what he calls their
purgative value. In the same spirit he asserts
that the function of tragedy, with its
sensational representations of the calamities of
its heroes, is by the vehicle of fear and pity
to purge our minds of those and similar
emotions. The explanation of the theory is to be
sought in the literal sense of the medical term
purgative (Taylor, Aristotle, 109).
15Catharsis release of emotion
- This idea of release of emotion has been the
traditional interpretation. Consider the
following translation - Some persons fall into a religious frenzy, and
we see them restored as a result of the sacred
melodies-when they used the melodies that excite
the soul to mystic frenzy-as though they had
found healing medical treatment and purgation
katharsis. Those who are influenced by pity or
fear, and every emotional nature, must have a
like experience, and others in so far as each is
susceptible to such emotions, and all are in a
manner purged and their souls lightened and
delighted. The melodies which purge the passion
likewise give an innocent pleasure to mankind.
Politics, Book VIII, 1342.6-15.
16Catharsis 3 Reasons Against Release of
emotion
-
- First, we know from Aristotles ethics that he
does not call for the celebration or the
suppression of emotions he argues for the
regular and well ordered expressions (pg.
18). In the Nicomachean Ethics (Book II 1103b18)
- Aristotle states
-
17Catharsis Reasons Against Release of emotion
- This, then, is the case with the excellences
also by doing the acts that we do in our
transactions with other men we become just or
just, and by doing the acts that we do in the
presence of danger, and being habituated to feel
fear or confidence, we become brave or cowardly.
The same is true of appetites and feelings of
anger some men become temperate and
good-tempered, others self-indulgent and
irascible, by behaving in one way or the other in
the appropriate circumstances. Thus, in one
word, states arise out of like activities. This
is why the activities we exhibit must be a
certain kind it is because the states correspond
to the differences between these. It makes no
small difference, then, whether we form habits of
one kind or of another from our very youth it
makes a very great difference, or rather all the
difference.
18Catharsis 3 reasons against Release of Emotion
- Second, music and poetry educates our emotions
because songs contain images of anger, courage
and other traits (Politics, Book VIII,
1340a-1921. Consider the following excerpt - Since then music is a pleasure, and excellence
consists in rejoicing and loving and hating
rightly, there is clearly nothing which we are so
much concerned to acquire and to cultivate as the
power of forming right judgments, and of taking
delight in good dispositions and noble actions.
Rhythm and melody supply imitations of anger and
gentleness, and also of courage and temperance,
and of all the qualities contrary to these, and
of the other qualities of character, which hardly
fall short of the actual affections, as we know
from our own experience, for in listening to such
strains our souls undergo a change. Politics,
Book VIII, 1340a14-22.
19Catharsis Another Interpretation
- Aristotle later states
- Enough has been said to show that music has a
power of forming the character, and should
therefore be introduced into the education of the
young. The study is suited to the stage of
youth, for young persons will not, if they can
help, endure anything which is not sweetened by
pleasure, and music has a natural sweetness.
There seems to be in us a sort of affinity to
musical modes and rhythms, which makes some
philosophers say that a soul is a harmony,
others, that is possesses harmony. - Politics, Book VIII, 1340b 11-19.
20Catharsis is clarification of emotions
- And third, delight over the whole experience
trains the soul to enjoy the sight of real-world
virtue. Politics, Book VIII 1340a22-27. - Therefore, on this view Pappas notes that
catharsis is a clarification of emotion. This is
the view held by L. Golden, R. Janko, and M.C.
Nussbaum. - Pappas states
21Catharsis is clarification of emotions
- Training emotions has nothing to do with
releasing them. Training presupposes that the
emotions are here to stay, and need to be
calibrated to fit the real-world situations that
call them forthBy rousing powerful emotions with
a simpler train of events than life provides,
tragedy teaches how fear and pity feel and where
they are appropriate. That understanding forms
part of the groundwork for ethical behavior,
since Aristotle connect ethical behavior to
well-trained emotions. Thus the clarification
view helps harmonize Aristotles aesthetic with
his ethics (pg. 18).
22Catharsis is clarification of emotions
- Nevertheless, this view has a glaring
difficulty. While this view offers contextual
support to Aristotles argument against Platos
view of art, music, and poetry, in Politics Book
VIII, 1342a7-15, Aristotle refers to catharsis as
a relief, something that makes the soul settle
down (pg. 18).
23Catharsis is incidents in the drama.
- According to Pappas, others still (e.g., Gerald
Else) contend that catharsis does not mean
purging of emotions or clarification of
emotions. Rather, than being a psychological
word, this word is a literary, narratological
term since coherent and significant plot
structure is the goal of tragedy (pg. 19). - This is a minority view.
- It has the advantage of looking in the Poetics
for an argument about what literature knows and
how it says it.
24Catharsis is incidents in the drama.
- According to Beardsley, Professor Else, on the
other hand, translates the passage as follows
carrying to completion, through a course of
events in involving pity and fear, the
purification of those painful or fatal acts which
have that quality. The purgation, in his
reading, is a purification, and it is not
something that takes place in the spectator at
all, but something that takes place in the play.
It is carried out by the plot itself, in virtue
of the fact that the plot consists of events of a
certain sort (Professor Else takes pathematon as
tragic events, because pathos in later chapters
means this) (pg. 65).
25Second Word Mimesis Image-Making.
- 1. Mimesis is natural to people from childhood
(Poetics 1448b6) as opposed to Plato who saw
image-making as a lower-level metaphysical
perversion. Plato thought of mimesis two fold
as (a) impersonating and the (b) mock up or
production of a likeness of something. - 2. Mimesis is a natural propensity and pleasant
because it is a way of learning (Poetics 1448b13
cf. 1448b8) as opposed to Plato who wants
knowledge to come in the form of universal
statements, the highest sort of learning.
26Second Word Mimesis Image-Making.
- 3. Humans love to learn (Metaphysics I.1) and
mimesis brings determination and simplification
to learning as opposed to Plato who finds it to
be denigrating to a virtuous education.
Aristotle saw mimesis can involve representation,
it is not mimicry nor counterfeiting. - 4. Aristotle argues that mimesis takes action as
its object thus, tragedy communicates
authentically philosophical knowledge as opposed
to Plato who argued that mimesis is passive since
it either involves putting on the mask (drama)
and impersonating or the production of a likeness
of something (poetry).
27Second Word Mimesis Image-Making of Reality.
- 5. Aristotle takes mimesis as imitating nature
because of its orderly and purposeful forms fine
arts take on these are productive purposes which
are rational, consciously perceive by the mind of
its maker (Metaphysics 7.7) as opposed to Plato
who thought it displaced or even corrupted reason
by arousing the non-rational part of the soul. - 6. Only the mimetic arts have as their specific
purpose to produce representations or fictional
depictions of the world or reality. This is
contrary to Plato because he saw mimesis as being
an imitation of appearance, not reality.
28Second Word Mimesis Image-Making of Reality.
- Regarding the relationship between reality and
the artwork, it is important to observe the
following quote from Poetics 9 - Poetry is more philosophical and more serious
than history, for it deals with universals, while
history speaks of particulars. - In other words, poetry is offering larger
conceptions which structure human experience and
understanding, bringing unity, wholeness, or
completeness. -
29Third Word Action.
- 1. Thus, mimesis is active mimesis communicates
knowledge, it is not passive, inherently weak,
corrupt, or based in ignorance. - 2. Just as some consider photography as not being
art because it is passive (Plato Republic 596d),
Aristotle considers mimesis to be an active
process of selective presentation because of
being a composer of plots, a drawer of lines, etc.
30Third Word Action.
- 3. Tragedy in poetry represents events and not
passions just as painting is more a matter of
line than of color (Poetics, 1450b2-3) - 4. A good plot clearly represents an action it
restricts itself to a unified action, even if
that involves differing characters and their
development. In fact a tragedy imitates a
complete action a beginning, middle and an end
(Poetics, 1450b26). The unity of ploy s derived
from the fact that it is a single action.
31Third Word Action.
- 5. The unity consists in the right connections
among the parts of a plot. Each even follows the
other either by necessity or probably (Poetics
1451a13, 38 1452a20). - 6. Tragedy that represents action contains a
general truth. - 7. Composing, plot making, play writing, are
constructions this is something musicians, story
tellers, poets, and story tellers do. Hence a
plot is an object that gets constructed.
32Third Word Action.
- Potential misreading of Plato
- A. Some have argued that Platos analogy of a
mirror meant to capture not passive automatism,
but superficiality. - B. Plato may think that the perversity is
misusing their talents to produce so little that
is virtuous. - C. Plato may have been concerned that
characterization, not plot, was the problem of
mimesis to duplicate an appearance is the issue
when you are strive for the universal form. -
-
33Third Word Action.
-
- - Even if this is the case, the Poetics assert
that plot supremacy over character establishes a
defense of the arts. The causal principle makes
the story plausible and contains the tragedys
general statement. Therefore, tragedy
communicated knowledge.
34Fourth Word Seriousness
- The tragic character be good, serious, superior
people (Poetics 1448a2 1454a17). These
characters dignity and standing ensure the
importance of what they undertake and undergo
(pg. 22). - Aristotle did not want tragedy to present
meaningless suffering tragic effect is
disgusting, Poetics 1452b36) where as
appearance of purpose or order is fine (Poetics
1452a6-10) (pg. 22-23).
35Fourth Word Seriousness
- Associates bad consequences to a characters
hamartia (Poetics 1453a10) which simply means a
mistake, error of judgment, foolishness, or
self-deception in classical Greek. (pg. 23). It
is not used as a defect of character but an
action the misfortune of heroes depends on what
they do. - Tragic plots have strong causal connects whereby
it instructs the audience on morality mimesis
imparts knowledge (pg. 23). - Luck is also involved things may not turn out
the way one necessarily hopes this is the plight
of the tragic hero does. - Therefore, for Aristotle, there is value in the
seriousness of tragedy (pg. 23).
36Aristotles View of Beauty
- Aristotle uses beauty (kalos) 19 times in
Poetics as compliment for tragic plots, language,
and character. - Only once does Aristotle make beauty a defining
criterion for tragedies, when he says they must
be neither too long to surpass what the memory
can hold, not too short to count as serious
(Poetics 1451a4-15) (pg. 24). - Beauty is defined in terms of size or proportion
(Metaphysics 1078a31-b5) - Beauty is a real property of things (Metaphysics
1072b32-35). Aristotle writes
37Aristotles View of Beauty
- Beauty is defined in terms of size or proportion
(Metaphysics 1078a31-b5). Consider Aristotles
comment in Poetics 1450b35 - either a living creature of any structure made
of parts, must have not only an orderly
arrangement of these parts but a size which is
not accidental-for beauty lies in size and
arrangement
38Aristotles View of Beauty
- Beauty is a real property of things (Metaphysics
1072b32-35). Aristotle writes - Those who suppose, as the Pythagoreans and
Speusippus do, that supreme beauty and goodness
are not present in the beginning, because the
beginnings both of plants and of animals are
causes, but beauty and completeness are in the
effects of these, are wrong in their opinion.
For the seed comes from other individuals which
are prior and complete, and the first thing is
not seed but the complete being, e.g., we must
say that before the seed there is a man,-not the
man produced from the seed, but another from whom
the seed is produced.
39Aristotles View of Beauty
- Moreover, in Parts of Animals, 645a23-25,
Aristotle relates beauty to design - Absence of haphazard and conduciveness of
everything to an end are to be found in natures
works in the highest degree, and the end for
which those work are put together and produced is
a form of the beautiful. - So, while Aristotles view of beauty may be
vague, it is clear that he believed beauty to be
objective beauty is derived from the nature of
the beautiful object it is related to size and
proportion it is related to design.
40Final Thoughts on Aristotles Aesthetics
- While Aristotle doesnt provide offer a robust
account of philosophical aesthetics whereby he
deals with the problems of defending aesthetic
judgments, we are able to conclude the following - Aesthetics involves objective reality it is
cognitively perceived and can be imitated. - Aesthetics is pedagogically valuable and serious.
- Beauty is a real property He is an empiricist
who believed all knowledge begins in the senses.
41Final Thoughts on Aristotles Aesthetics
- Aesthetics involves aesthetic experiences he
doesnt deny its impact on people. In fact, we
take pleasure in imitation because it is a
special case of learning. In fact, the unity of
plot, etc. may be seen as an aesthetic predicate. - Mimesis or imitation involves a special kind of
representation it is a matter of representing
an object. It can be the art of imitating visual
appearances by means of color and drawing or the
art of imitating human actions by means of dance
and song.
42Final Thoughts on Aristotles Aesthetics
- Mimesis in poetry, in order to have its impact,
must involve a real understanding of human
nature for without this knowledge you cant have
a very good play (Beardsley, 63). Therefore,
psychological laws must be true one for dramatic
development - Aristotle is a structural and textual critic
because he analyzes aspects of structure, chiefly
concerned with plot. If catharsis is seen as a
structural concept rather than a psychological
one, then this description of Aristotle is
appropriate. One can also say he is textual
critic because he is concerned with analysis at
the verbal level Rhetoric.
43Final Thoughts on Aristotles Aesthetics
- Beardsley makes two comments that are most
interesting to consider. First - What Plato feared most as a bad example for
Athenian youth was the suggestion that good men
are unhappy and that bad men prosper.
Aristotles reply might be understood in this
way there is no need to have a moral censorship
of plays, but only an aesthetic one. For the
play about the good man who becomes unhappy or
the bad man who becomes happy will simply not be
a very good tragedy other things being equal,
morality and justice will coincide with aesthetic
excellence (Aesthetics, pg. 67).
44Final Thoughts on Aristotles Aesthetics
- And secondly, Monroe Beardsley observes
- When Aristotle inquires into the nature of
somethingHe asks what is the nature of the
poetic art? And the answer is both normative and
descriptive. For it involves a set of categories
that play a fundament role in all of his
thinking the four causes, or four types of
explanation (see Physics II, vii). These are not
mentioned in the Poetics itself, but it is
interesting that in the Metaphysics (V ? , ii)
when he distinguishes the four causes, his
example of the material cause is the bronze of
the statue the formal cause is the pattern,
or formula of the essence the efficient cause
is the productive agent (e.g., the sculptor and
his activity) the final cause is the end,
i.e., that for the sake of which a thing is
(trans. Ross) (pp. 55-56).
45Final Thoughts on Aristotles Aesthetics
Four causes for the statue of Athena
2 intrinsic causes Material
Cause Bronze out of which it was
made. Formal Cause Pattern, form,
essence of which it was made.
2 External causes Efficient Cause
Artist by which it was made Final Cause
The purpose that for which it was made.
46Postscript
- A.E. Taylor makes an interesting claim about the
Poetics - Poetics was meant to be a collection of rules
by obeying which the craftsman might make sure of
turning out a successful play. So far as
Aristotle has a Philosophy of Fine Art at all, it
forms part of his more general theory of
education and must be looked for in the general
discussion of the aims of education in his
Politics. Aristotle, 20-21.
47Bibliography
- Aristotle, The Complete Works of Aristotle, rev.
Oxford Translation, edited by Jonathan Barnes, 2
Vols. (Princeton Princeton University Press,
1984). - Monroe Beardsley, Aesthetics From Classical
Greek to the Present A Short History
(Tuscaloosa The University of Alabama Press,
1966). - A Companion to Aesthetics (Malden, M.A.
Blackwell, 1992, 1995). - Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, edited by
Berys Gaut and Dominic McIver Lopes (London
Routledge, 2001). - A.E. Taylor, Aristotle, 3rd edition (Toronto,
Ontario General Publishing 1955).