Global Plan to STOP TB: Diagnostics WG - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Global Plan to STOP TB: Diagnostics WG

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Author: cunninghamj Last modified by: cunninghamj Created Date: 10/18/2005 6:40:50 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: cunn49
Learn more at: https://stoptb.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Global Plan to STOP TB: Diagnostics WG


1
Global Plan to STOP TB Diagnostics WG
  • Jane Cunningham
  • Medical Officer WHO/TDR/PDE
  • Secretariat STOP TB Diagnostics Working Group

2
The Global Plan Process.
  • Planning workshop in Montreux Switzerland
    attended by the WG chair, secretariat and the WG
    Chair appointed focal point, Heidi Albert, Biotec
    Labs.
  • The aim was to model the collective impact of
    proposed WG activities, assess whether the impact
    would be sufficient to meet the global TB targets
    for 2015, and estimate the costs involved

3
The Global Plan Process.
  • 1 --- Understand the MODEL !!!
  • 2--- Teach modelers about DIAGNOSTICS !!!
  • 3 -- Estimate costs for RD and
    implementation of diagnostics that don't exist
    !!!

4
MODEL INPUTS - CONSTANTS          
constants symbol        
  HIV neg values used HIV pos values used values used
time step (yr) dt 1      
infectious contacts/person/yr b 11.0 bh 11.0  
reactivation rate/person/yr v 0.000113 vh 0.2  
proportion infections leading to progessive primary disease f 0.15 fh 0.7  
proportion active cases sm s 0.45 sh 0.3  
proportion infected persons susceptible to reinfection x 0.35 xh 0.75  
natural recovery rate from TB/patient/yr rec 0.065 rech 0.00  
background death rate/person/yr u 0.015 uh 0.15  
TB (ss) death rate/patient/yr ui 0.15 uih 0.25  
TB (ss-) death rate/patient/yr uin 0.070 uinh 0.25  
TB death rate post treatment ut 0.00      
relapse F to I ret 0.000 reth 0.00  
relative infectiousness F rel 0.00      
hiv scale hivsc 1.00      
efficacy IPT for HIV (TST)     eipt 0.4  
efficacy ARTCPT     eart 0.4  
efficacy CPT     ecpt 0.6  
           
  eqm 0   2006-2015  
DOTS DOTS (-2005) 1 cases m 22.770  
Enhanced DOTS DOTS (2006-) 0 HIV cases m 12.030  
HIV epidemic hiv 1      
ICF icf 0 deaths m 7.6780  
ART or CPT artcpt 0 HIV TB deaths m 4.3242  
CPT only cpt only 0      
IPT ipt 0 cost bn 11.384  
Vaccine vac 0 cost TB-HIV bn 0.788  
mdr epidemic mdr 0      
DOTS mdrt 0      
           
5
Mechanisms
6
The Global Plan Process.
  • 1 --- Understand the MODEL !!!
  • 2--- Teach modelers about DIAGNOSTICS !!!
  • 3 -- Estimate costs for RD and
    implementation of diagnostics that don't exist
    !!!

7
Sensitivity (HIV, pulm, e-p) smcases averted
overtreatment averted
8
Targets for Test Introduction Leading to
Sustainable Adoption 2006-2015
9
(No Transcript)
10
Working Group and Secretariat Strategic Plans
  • In October 2004, the Coordinating Board asked
    each WG (plus the Partnership Secretariat) to
    provide by the end of April 2005 its draft
    strategic plan of activities and budgets
    necessary to contribute to achieving the 2015
    global TB control targets.
  • 1st draft circulated in April/May 2005
  • Final version September 2005

11
Highlights of the Strategic Plan
  • Vision to develop and introduce cost-effective
    and appropriate new diagnostic tools that are
    accessible to patients and will contribute
    towards improved control of the global TB
    epidemic and improve the quality of patient care.
  • Ideal toolbox would contain diagnostic
    technologies, all of which perform equally well
    in HIV-infected subjects, to
  • improve TB case detection both through high
    sensitivity/specificity and improved
    accessibility simple, accurate, inexpensive,
    same day, near-patient products are the ultimate
    goal
  • rapidly and inexpensively identify drug resistant
    TB disease, enabling timely effective patient
    treatment to reduce both individual morbidity and
    continuing transmission
  • reliably identify latent TB infection and define
    the risk of future progression to active disease,
    enabling rational use of preventive therapy in
    appropriate subjects

12
Objectives
  • OBJECTIVE 1 Address existing knowledge gaps
    obstructing development of new diagnostic tools
  • OBJECTIVE 2 Development and evaluation of a
    portfolio of new diagnostic tools and
    demonstration of impact
  • OBJECTIVE 3 Implementation of new diagnostic
    tools and ensuring access

13
TB Diagnostics Development Pipeline 2005
14
Objective 1 Targets Indicators
  • Discovery science to identify new markers (also
    in HIV-infected subjects) with improved
    discriminative power for active disease (may be
    antigenic, immunological, proteomic or other) and
    drug resistance
  • Indicators of grants publications
    targets/reagents, new technologies, sample
    requests from reference banks

15
Objective 2 Targets Indicators
  • Inclusion of related goals in research funding
    calls by major funding agencies
  • Public sector product development agreements with
    industry
  • Coordinated evaluation and demonstration projects
  • Indicators of - funding opportunities Product
    Development agreements with industrial partners
    successfully completed Development and Technical
    Evaluations according to Product Specifications
    clinical evaluation and demonstration sites
    developed and authorized peer-reviewed
    publications reporting results from evaluation
    projects

16
Targets for Test Introduction Leading to
Sustainable Adoption 2006-2015
17
Objective 3 Targets Indicators
  • Operational studies to demonstrate
    epidemiological and economic impact of new tools
    in high-burden settings
  • Accelerated registration of products with proven
    utility
  • National and international policy changes
    reflecting impact evidence on new diagnostics
  • Creation of demand through communication to
    stakeholders (NTPs, MOH, technical and funding
    agencies.)
  • Ensured access to proven technologies through
    inclusion in GDF or other procurement mechanisms
  • Key Indicators of NTPs with new diagnostics in
    policy recommendations and implemented at
    district, local and point of care
  • Modeling studies ---- FIND Symposium October
    21,2005

18
Key Risk Factors
  • Insufficient financial investment and timing of
    investment
  • Technologies Fail
  • Inadequate development of laboratory
    strengthening
  • Impaired access to new products
  • Interrupted product supply

19
Acknowledgements Heidi Albert David Moore
Mark Perkins Afranio Kritski Ruth
McNerney Arend Kolk Chris Dye Andrea Pantoja
Bernadette Bourdin
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com