Cognitive Computing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Cognitive Computing

Description:

Cognitive Computing Consciousness and Computation Advanced topics in Cognitive Computation Lent term assignments Mark Bishop – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:171
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: MarkBi152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cognitive Computing


1
Cognitive Computing
  • Consciousness and Computation
  • Advanced topics in Cognitive Computation
  • Lent term assignments
  • Mark Bishop

2
Consciousness and Computations
  • Formative (30)
  • Prove that the machine NORMA_STACK is no more
    powerful than the universal machine NORMA by
    designing two MACROs to implement
  • (a) XPOP which removes the top value from the
    STACK and places it into the X register(b) PUSH
    (X) which places the contents of the X register
    on to the top of the STACK
  • and submit a short (no more than 1-page) report
    detailing their operation.
  • Summative (70)
  • A 3000 word researched essay, An introduction to
    Wiedermann and Leeuwens Autopoietic Automata
    (AA) theory (submitted by 5pm, Friday 22nd
    March, 2013).
  • It is anticipated that at minimum - student
    essays will address
  • (a) the Turing model of computation
  • (b) the Interaction model of computation
  • (c) what is an AA?
  • (d) what is the relation of AAs to other models
    of computation (e.g. Turing machines, Interaction
    machines etc.)
  • (e) what is the computational power of an AA
  • (f) the implications if any of AA (and more
    generally the interactive model) for cognitive
    science.

3
References
  • Amongst other sources students are recommended to
    consult
  • Jan van Leeuwen Jiri Wiedermann (2001) Beyond
    the Turing Limit Evolving Interactive Systems.
    In Leszek Pacholski Peter Ruzicka, editors
    SOFSEM 2001 Theory and Practice of Informatics,
    28th Conference on Current Trends in Theory and
    Practice of Informatics Piestany, Slovak
    Republic, November 24 - December 1, 2001,
    Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science
    2234. Springer, pp. 90109. Available at
    http//link.springer.de/link/service/series/0558/b
    ibs/2234/22340090.htm.
  • Jan van Leeuwen Jiri Wiedermann (2001) The
    Turing machine paradigm in contemporary
    computing. In B. Enquist W. Schmidt, editors
    Mathematics Unlimited 2001 and Beyond.
    Springer-Verlag, p. 1139-1155.
  • Peter Verbaan, Jan van Leeuwen Jiri Wiedermann
    (2004) Complexity of Evolving Interactive
    Systems. In Juhani Karhumaki, Hermann A. Maurer,
    Gheorghe Paun Grzegorz Rozenberg, editors
    Theory Is Forever, Essays Dedicated to Arto
    Salomaa on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday,
    Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3113. Springer,
    pp. 268281. Available at http//springerlink.met
    apress.com/openurl.asp?genrearticleampissn0302
    -9743ampvolume3113ampspage268.
  • Jiri Wiedermann (2007) Autopoietic automata
    Complexity issues in offspring-producing evolving
    processes. Theor. Comput. Sci. 383(2-3), pp.
    260269.

4
Advanced topics in Cognitive Computation
  • Formative (30)
  • Two summary and two background seminars on
    chapter(s) from Aleksander, I. Morton, H.,
    (2012), Aristotles Laptop the discovery of our
    informational mind, World Scientific.
  • Summative (70)
  • (a) A mini (500) word review Aristotles
    Laptop the discovery of our informational mind,
    World Scientific (the best short review to be
    submitted for publication in AISBQ magazine).
  • (b) A more in-depth (2000 word) researched
    review of the work as a whole (the best in depth
    review to be submitted for publication in
    Cognitive Computation journal)
  • Both reviews to be submitted by 5pm, Friday 22nd
    March, 2013 at a minimum both reviews should
    discuss (a) what is the core thesis of the text
    and (b) is this thesis convincing. The second
    (extended) review should also (a) identify and
    outline the relationship of the text to other key
    works in the field and (b) offer at least some
    critical analysis of the ideas.

5
Seminar lists
  • C2/Week 2 Stephen summary Emily background
  • C3/Week 3 Asei summary Monica background
  • C4/Week 4 Monica summary Asei background
  • C5/Week 5 Emily summary Stephen background
  • READING WEEK
  • C6/Week 7 Anna summary Emily background
  • C7/Week 8 Monica summary Asei background
  • C8/Week 9 Emily summary Monica background
  • C9/Week 10 Asei Summary Stephen background
  • C10/Week 11 Stephen summary Anna REVIEW

6
Research project and Dissertation
  • The research project is a substantial software
    implementation in the broad area of Cognitive
    Computing.
  • The project aims to allow students to put into
    practice some of the newly acquired cognitive
    computing techniques on either a technical
    implementation - for example the use of AI or
    Neural Networks in a computer game - or an
    experimental investigation of some cognitive
    phenomena (e.g. change blindness).
  • Selection of an appropriate research project is
    one aspect of the assessment process.

7
Requirements
  • Students implement a Cognitive Computing project
    and dissertation, which should include a suitable
    literature search of the research area,
    emphasising the methodological aspects of the
    work.
  • Students should select their project during terms
    one and two, by liaising with potential research
    supervisors (check out faculty web pages for
    research interests) and submit a project form
    (indicating project supervisors) by the end of
    term two (the form is provided in the course
    handbook).
  • This is a formal requirement for progression if
    the project form has not been submitted, then the
    student will not be allowed to progress to
    dissertation.

8
Length etc.
  • During the third term students should make
    arrangements to meet with their project
    supervisor on at least four occasions twice at
    the start of the project (to introduce the
    project confirm key project questions and
    strategy etc) and twice towards the end of term
    three (to confirm the thesis outline demonstrate
    any project work and/or highlight key
    experimental findings review answers to research
    questions demonstrate an appropriate academic
    writing writing style etc).
  • The course is primarily assessed via a
    substantial 15-20,000 word dissertation together
    with an appropriate software implementation
    and/or series of experiments.
  • Research only projects can be considered in
    exceptional circumstances.
  • The dissertation must be completed by the end of
    the third term (20rd September 2013).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com