Contingent Valuation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Contingent Valuation

Description:

... can bias responses by tapping values even more important than the environment Value Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Spill was ... Exxon Valdez Oil Spill ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Robert2525
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Contingent Valuation


1
Contingent Valuation
  • Bangkok 2013

2
Stated Preference
  • Attitudinal versus behavioral
  • What people say are their values rather than the
    implicit values consistent with their behavior
  • Attitudes and behavioral values are not always
    consistent
  • People tend to believe in loftier (more socially
    correct) values than they actually use

3
Attitudinal Questions
  • Excellent mechanism to gauge qualitative
    information
  • Peoples ranking of good A versus good B
  • Which is better program A or program B
  • Less perfect mechanism for quantitative values
  • Extra dollar value of a 1/10,000 risk versus a
    1/1,000 risk
  • Can people place a value on the environment?

4
Method
  • Ask people dollar value of the environment
  • What are you willing to pay in higher entrance
    fees to plant more trees in your local city
    park?
  • What are you willing to pay in higher taxes to
    double the size of the Mangrove forest in
    Bangladesh?
  • What are you willing to pay in higher prices for
    food to preserve the Bengal tiger in India?

5
Application- Valuation
  • Existing environmental site (park or forest)
  • Environmental investment (new forest)
  • Altered management (buses rather than cars in a
    park)
  • Environmental characteristic (preserve a species,
    protect ancient versus young trees, eliminate an
    invasive species)

6
Payment vehicle
  • The payment vehicle is the way the respondent
    is to pay for the good in question
  • Needed to make the question seem realistic
  • Can use taxes, prices, lost income
  • Note that the respondent may care which payment
    vehicle is used

7
Comparison with Revealed Preference
  • CV yields similar responses to markets for market
    goods (used to predict consumer response to new
    products)
  • CV yields similar response to travel cost of
    familiar sites (local fishing site, favorite
    park)
  • Not clear that CV yields reliable response to
    unfamiliar environmental goods (Antarctica)
  • Unreliable response to existence value

8
Limitations
  • People need to be familiar with good being valued
  • Cannot value a ton of greenhouse gas because
    people do not know what damage is caused by a ton
    of greenhouse gas
  • Cannot value your favorite park because not
    clear what park that is
  • Need to provide information to be clear what the
    good is that is being valued

9
Information tends not to be neutral
  • Some information is purely a fact (hectares of
    forest)
  • Much information is value laden
  • Unique natural landscape
  • Precious remaining forest
  • Threatened tigers
  • Provision of information can bias responses by
    tapping values even more important than the
    environment

10
Value Exxon Valdez Oil Spill
  • Spill was unfortunate accident in pursuit of
    energy independence
  • Spill was worsened because government containment
    boats were broken
  • Captain of ship was drunk
  • Exxon was most profitable company in the world
  • Spill damaged pristine waterways
  • There were no people where the spill occurred

11
WTP vs WTA
  • Cannot use willingness to accept (WTA) questions
    to value goods
  • Respondents instinctively bargain with WTA
  • Average WTA answer is seven times WTP answer
  • Consistently biased upwards

12
Protest votes
  • Some respondents reject the premise of the CV
    question and protest by answering zero
  • Reasons
  • Not responsible to pay (government or business
    responsibility)
  • Reject the payment vehicle
  • May not feel project will occur even if
    respondent pays

13
Remove protest votes
  • Need to distinguish between protest votes and
    real zero response
  • Ask attitudinal questions about who should pay to
    protect the environment, persons confidence
    project will be undertaken, feelings about taxes
  • Remove observations that are zero and answer
    attitude questions in hostile manner

14
Existence Value
  • What will people pay for a distant natural site
    to exist?
  • What will people pay for a specific species to
    exist?
  • Answer is rarely zero.
  • Yet there are hundreds of thousands of distant
    places and species. What would people pay for all
    of them? What share belongs to each site and
    species?

15
Exercise
  • Design a contingent valuation question of the
    most famous natural site in your country
  • Include information about the site
  • Administer the survey to 20 people in the room
    who are not from your country
  • Examine the responses
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com