Title: Adequacy%20of%20Saving%20for%20Old-Age%20in%20Europe
1Adequacy of Saving for Old-Age in Europe
- Discussion by Michael Hurd
2Topic most developed in U.S.
- Data
- But more interesting topic in U.S. because of
greater dependence on savings and private
pensions - If public pension is sole source of financing,
debate is whether pensions are large enough.
3Popular press and some research
- Baby-boomers headed for poverty in retirement!
- 60 not adequately prepared!
- Need 2M in retirement assets!
- Etc.
4Yet..
- Current retired doing fine
- Cohort studies show improvements (or at least not
getting worse) - Age 51-56 in 1992
- Age 51-56 in 2004 at least as well off as
measured by saving plus pension wealth - What is going on?
5How to think about problem?
- Two persons with different lifetime earnings
- Should have different levels of economic
resources in retirement...which one more
adequate - Comparison requires comparing economic resources
with lifetime earnings for each person
6Most common comparison
- Income replacement rate
- Income at retirement relative to income before
retirement - Simple case
- r 0
- annuitization so that consumption income after
retirement
7replacement rate A/E (70)
earnings
annuity
E
consumption
A
65
20
85
Age
8Slightly more complex case
- Increasing income with age
9replacement rate A/E (60)
earnings
annuity
E
consumption
A
10Better comparison
- Average lifetime earnings rather than final
earnings - Already more difficult...data requirements,
interest rate assumptions etc - But what about changes in household composition?
11replacement rate A/E (35)
Aunt Tilly visits
Ann born
12This household will want to allocate fewer
resources to retirement phase
- Will want lower replacement rate whether measured
with respect to final income or life-time income - Thus in relatively simple situation, no universal
replacement rate -
13Another situation
- No pensions
- Only savings
- Income in retirement is small...interest on
wealth - Clear income replacement rate makes no sense
14Actual situation
- Mix between pension and savings
- Varies across people and across countries
- Solution in literature annuitize savings
- But people dont annuitize
- Not an accurate description of saving adequacy
15Other issues
- the differing role of taxes for households at
different points in the income distribution - work-related expenses
- the time horizon or survival curve of the
household - returns to scale in consumption reduced
spending once one of the partners dies - the changing consumption profile with age
- Differential mortality
16Married. College graduate
Single. Less than high school education
Those with fewer resources need fewer resources
17One additional problem
- Different uncertainties after retirement
- Insurance incomplete and varies from person to
person and across countries
18All these problems remain when savings annuitized
and added to pensions
- And no solution to this problem
19replacement rate A/E (35)
Aunt Tilly visits
Ann born
20Inevitably drawn to an economic model to make
comparisons
- But what model?
- Life-cycle model says what an informed utility
maximizer would do. - Obvious starting point
- Does not lead to income replacement rate concept
21What do we see in U.S. when use life-cycle model?
- Compare actual wealth with optimal wealth
- Over-saving! (Schulz et al, 2006)
- But lifetime utility below optimum
- Compare consumption at retirement (and associated
with life-cycle path) with economic resources - Almost 80 adequately prepared (Hurd and
Rohwedder, 2008)
22How did households achieve this?
- We dont know
- All we can do is to assess outcome
23Relevance for Europe
- With reduction in state DB pensions larger mix of
savings and private pensions - U.S. experience may be relevant for future
24This paper
- Conceptualize situation
- Input into debate
- But to implement measures of economic preparation
need data - Is there something between income replacement and
full-scale life-cycle model? - Excellent start