CHAPTER%204%20 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

CHAPTER%204%20

Description:

CEE 698 Construction Health and Safety CHAPTER 4 ETHICS AND SAFETY * * An Ethical Dilemma - Example Southland Prestressed Concrete (SPC) company has been ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:162
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Sale105
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CHAPTER%204%20


1
CHAPTER 4 ETHICS AND SAFETY
2
An Ethical Dilemma - Example
  • Southland Prestressed Concrete (SPC) company has
    been awarded a contract to build an ultramodern
    multistory shopping mall.
  • The University Mall is the largest contract SPC
    has ever undertaken.
  • In order to win the contract SPCs Vice President
    had to a agree to a completion date, that if not
    reasonable, is at least going to be challenging.
  • In addition, all exposed concrete surfaces must
    be sprayed with a specified paint that is highly
    toxic and difficult to apply.

3
An Ethical Dilemma - Example
  • SPCs subcontractor has never used this
    particular type of paint before.
  • Personal protective equipment and other
    engineering controls can minimize the potential
    hazards, but all precautions must be stringently
    observed with absolutely no shortcuts.
  • The manufacturer of the paint recommends 3 full
    days of training for all employees who will work
    with the paint.
  • The recommended training cannot be provided soon
    enough to fit into SPCs expedited schedule for
    this job.

4
An Ethical Dilemma - Example
  • In a secret meeting, SPCs executive managers
    decide to purchase the necessary personal
    protective equipment, use the toxic paint as
    specified and forgo the recommended training.
  • In addition, the executives decide to withhold
    from employees all information about the toxicity
    of the paint.
  • Safety engineer was not invited to the secret
    meeting however the decision made during the
    meeting were slipped to him anonymously.

5
An Ethical Dilemma - Example
  • Safety engineer faces an ethical dilemma
  • If he chooses to do nothing, employees might be
    inappropriately exposed to a highly dangerous
    substance.
  • If he shares what he knows with the
    subcontractor, he might be called upon to testify
    about what he knows a step that could cost him
    his job and threaten his career.

6
Definitions
  • Ethics the study of morality within a context
    established by cultural and professional values,
    social norms, and accepted standards of behavior
  • Morality the values that are subscribed to and
    fostered by society in general.
  • Ethical behavior falls within the limits
    prescribed by morality.
  • Ethical questions are rarely black and white.
    They typically fall into a gray area between two
    extremes of right and wrong.
  • Personal experience, self-interest, point of
    view, and external pressure often cloud this gray
    area even further.

7
Guidelines for Determining Ethical Behavior
  • Guidelines are needed when trying to sort out
    matters that are not clearly right or wrong.
  • It is necessary to distinguish between the
    concepts of legal and ethical.
  • Just because an option is legal does not
    necessarily mean it is ethical.
  • Guidelines for determining ethical behavior
    assuming that the behavior in question is legal.
  • Morning After Test
  • How will you feel the morning after?
  • Front Page Test
  • Would it embarrass you if it were a story on the
    front page of the newspaper?

8
Guidelines for Determining Ethical Behavior
  • Mirror Test
  • How will you feel about yourself when you look in
    the mirror?
  • Role-Reversal Test
  • Trade places with the people affected by your
    decision and view the decision through their
    eyes.
  • Common-Sense Test
  • Listen to your instincts and common sense. If it
    feels wrong, it probably is.

9
Guidelines for Determining Ethical Behavior
  • Blanchard and Peale suggest their own testing for
    deciding ethical choice in a given situation
  • Is it legal?
  • If an action is not legal, it is also not
    ethical.
  • Is it balanced?
  • If an action is balanced, it is fair to all
    involved
  • How will it make me feel about myself?
  • If a course of action is in keeping with our own
    moral structure, it will make you feel good about
    yourself.

10
Five Ps of Ethical Power
  1. Purpose Individuals see themselves as ethical
    people who let their conscience be their guide
    and, in all cases, want to feel good about
    themselves.
  2. Pride Individuals apply internal guidelines and
    have sufficient self-esteem to make decisions
    that may not be popular with others.
  3. Patience Individual believe right will prevail
    in the long run, and they are willing to wait
    when necessary.
  4. Persistence Individuals are willing to stay with
    an ethical course of action once it has been
    chosen and to see it through to a positive
    conclusion.
  5. Perspective Individuals take the time to reflect
    and are guided by their own internal barometer
    when making ethical decisions.

11
Ethical Behavior in Organizations
  • Trevino suggest ethical behavior in organizations
    is influenced by individual factors and social
    factors.
  • Individual Factors
  • Ego Strength
  • Ability to undertake tasks and cope with tense
    situations
  • Machiavellianism
  • Attempt to deceive
  • Locus of control
  • Workers perspective on who controls their
    behavior (Internal or External)
  • Social Factors
  • Gender, age, work experience, influence of
    people, etc.
  • People learn appropriate behavior by observing
    the behavior of significant role models.

12
Construction Professionals and Ethics
  • Knowing what is ethical is easier than actually
    doing it.
  • Construction professionals should,
  • Set an example
  • Help employees facing ethical questions in
    decision making
  • Help employees undertake the chosen ethical
    option.
  • One of the following approaches can be adapted
  • Best-ratio approach
  • Black-and-white approach
  • Full potential approach

13
Best-Ratio Approach
  • Pragmatic option
  • Sometimes referred to as situational ethics.
  • People are basically good
  • Under certain conditions, people may be driven to
    unethical behavior.
  • Construction professionals should do everything
    possible to create conditions that promote
    ethical behavior and try to maintain the highest
    possible ratio of good choices to bad.
  • When hard decisions must be made, the appropriate
    choice is the one that does the most good for
    most people.

14
Black-and-White Approach
  • Right is right, wrong is wrong.
  • Circumstances are irrelevant
  • Construction professionals job is to make
    ethical decisions and carry them out and, in
    addition to help employees choose the ethical
    route.
  • When difficult decisions must be made,
    construction professionals should make fair and
    impartial choices regardless of outcomes.

15
Full-Potential Approach
  • Decisions are made based on how the outcomes
    affect the ability of individuals to achieve
    their full potential.
  • People are responsible for realizing their full
    potential within the confines of morality.
  • Choices that can achieve this goal without
    infringing on the rights of others are considered
    ethical.

16
Approaches
  • Decisions made may differ, depending on the
    approach selected.
  • In the case study of Southland Prestressed
    Concrete (SPC) company,
  • If the safety engineer applies the best-ratio
    approach, he may decide to keep quiet, encourage
    the proper usage of personal protective
    equipment, and hope for the best.
  • If he takes the black-and-white approach, he will
    be compelled to confront the SPCs management
    team with what he knows.

17
Companys Role in Ethics
  • Construction companies, have a critical role to
    play in promoting ethical behavior among their
    employees.
  • Construction professionals cannot set ethical
    examples alone or expect employees to behave
    ethically in a vacuum.
  • A companys role in ethics can be summarized as
  • Creating an internal environment that promotes,
    expects, and rewards ethical behavior.
  • Setting an example of ethical behavior in all
    external dealings.

18
Creating an Ethical Environment
  • Companies create an ethical environment by
    establishing policies and practices that ensure
    that all employees are treated ethically and then
    enforcing these policies.
  • Companies can create an ethics policy
  • J. R. Makin Construction Company will conduct
    its business in strict compliance with applicable
    laws, rules, regulations, corporate policies,
    procedures, and guidelines. We will conduct all
    business with honesty, integrity, and a strong
    commitment to the highest standards of ethics.
    We have a duty to conduct our business with both
    the letter and the spirit of the law.

19
Setting an Ethical Example
  • Companies that take the do as I say, not as I
    do approach to ethics do not succeed.
  • Employees must be able to trust their company
    leaders to conduct all external and internal
    dealings in an ethical manner.
  • Companies must support employees who make
    ethically correct decisions.
  • In the case study of Southland Prestressed
    Concrete (SPC) company, higher management must
    stand behind the safety manager if he decides to
    confront the management team.

20
Handling Ethical Dilemmas
  • Steps of handling ethical dilemmas
  • Apply the guidelines to determine what is
    ethical.
  • Use the simple tests
  • Goal is to identify the ethical choice.
  • Select the Approach
  • Consider the best ratio, black-and-white, and
    full potential approaches
  • Personal makeup, expectations of the company,
    degree of company support affect the decision.
  • Proceeding with the Decision
  • Proceed in strict accordance with the approach
    selected
  • Consistency is critical when handling ethical
    dilemmas.

21
Whistle-Blowing
  • Whistle-blowing the act of informing an outside
    authority or media organ of alleged illegal or
    unethical acts on the part of an organization or
    individual.
  • Problems with whistle-blowing
  • Retribution
  • Damaged relationships and hostility
  • Loss of focus
  • Scapegoating

22
OSHA and Whistle-Blowing
  • Employee protection provisions
  • Section 211 of the Energy Reorganization Act
    (ERA)
  • This statute makes it illegal for an employer
    covered by the act to discharge an employee or
    otherwise discriminate against an employee in
    terms of compensation, conditions, or privileges
    of the employment because the employee or any
    person acting at an employees request performs a
    protected activity.
  • Employers covered by the ERA include the
    following
  • Licensees of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or
    an agreement state (including applicants for a
    license)
  • A contractor or subcontractor of a licensee or
    applicant
  • A contractor or subcontractor of the Department
    of Energy

23
OSHA and Whistle-Blowing
  • Key provisions to the ERA
  • Every employee has the right to raise a safety
    concern
  • Unlawful acts by employers in the form of
    intimidation, threatening, restrain, coerce,
    blacklist, discharge, or discriminate any
    employees
  • Complaints by an employee or representative may
    be filed up to 180 days of the action.
  • Enforcement if the employers cannot provide
    clear evidence of no violation, OSHA performs an
    investigation.
  • Relief if found in violation, the employer must
    provide appropriate relief in the form of
    reinstatement, back wages, compensation for
    injuries, and attorneys fees and costs.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com