Title: Orange Earth
1 Primary Monitoring Focus (20 USC 616(a)(2)) is
Improving educational results and functional
outcomes for all children with disabilities
versus ensuring that States meet IDEA program
procedural requirements.
RDA
All components of an accountability system will
be aligned in a manner that best support States
in improving results for infants, toddlers,
children and youth with disabilities, and their
families.
2OSEP RDA
Strands of Action
3Support provided to select sites. Services are a
negotiated set of activities designed to reach a
valued outcome.
Support provided to multiple sites based on
common needs in a few specific areas.
Services include the distribution of resources
with or without a direct request for the info.
Results-Driven Accountability
4OSEP RDA
5 State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)
New OSEP Proposed Indicator
FFY 2013 to FFY 2018
Will be used in determinations
SSIP
Comprehensive, ambitious yet achievable plan
A significant piece of work
- A comprehensive, multi-year plan, moving from
individual indicator improvement activities to
broad strategies focused on improving results for
students with an IEP.
6 SSIP Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)
Data Analysis
Identification of the Focus for Improvement
Infrastructure to Support Improvement Build
Capacity
Theory of Action (IF-THEN)
- To determine the areas for improvement
- Report analysis methodology, data quality issues,
additional data needs - Identify compliance issues that are barriers to
achieving improved student results
7 SSIP Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)
Data Analysis
Identification of the Focus for Improvement
Infrastructure to Support Improvement Build
Capacity
Theory of Action (IF-THEN)
- Identification of the Focus for Improvement
- Describe strategies that will lead to a
measureable student-based result - Demonstrate how strategies will build LEA
capacity to improve student results
8 SSIP Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)
Data Analysis
Identification of the Focus for Improvement
Infrastructure to Support Improvement Build
Capacity
Theory of Action (IF-THEN)
- Describe within the State System regarding
- Decision-making process
- Representatives that must be involved in planning
for systematic improvements
9 SSIP Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)
Data Analysis
Identification of the Focus for Improvement
Infrastructure to Support Improvement Build
Capacity
Theory of Action (IF-THEN)
- State analyzed capacity of its current system to
implement sustain evidence-based practices
(state district level) - Strengths, weaknesses, coordination of
governance, fiscal, quality standards, PD, data,
TA accountability - Analysis of any initiatives in the State which
may impact SWIs
10 SSIP Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015)
Data Analysis
Identification of the Focus for Improvement
Infrastructure to Support Improvement Build
Capacity
Theory of Action (IF-THEN)
- Based on the State-identified, measurable
improvement in results for SWI - Describe the strategies outcomes that will need
to be met to achieve the identified results - Describe the changes in the State System,
districts, schools and provider practices that
must occur to achieve the identified results
11 SSIP Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016)
Infrastructure Development
Support for LEA Implementation of Evidence-Based
Practices
Evaluation Plan
12 SSIP Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016)
Infrastructure Development
Support for LEA Implementation of Evidence-Based
Practices
Evaluation Plan
13 SSIP Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016)
Infrastructure Development
Support for LEA Implementation of Evidence-Based
Practices
Evaluation Plan
14 SSIP Phase 3 (submitted in Feb. 2017)
Results of Ongoing Evaluation
Revisions to SPP
15 SSIP Phase 3 (submitted in Feb. 2017)
Results of Ongoing Evaluation
Revisions to SPP
16 How does it affect me?
Today Suggest Areas for Analysis
Future Provide Input During All Phases
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24 A Responsive, Durable System
25Draft Action Timelines