Title: Measure Tracks decay from heavy flavor mesons
1Measure Tracks decay from heavy flavor mesons
2Primary tracks
From D0 decays
3(No Transcript)
4- Semiconductor with moderate bandgap (1.12 eV)
- Thermal energy 1/40 ev
- Little cooling required
- Energy to create e/h pair (signal quanta) 3.6
eV c.f Argon gas 15 eV - Scintillator 100-200ev
- High carrier yield
- Good energy resolution
- Fano factor for Si, F 0.1
conduction band
forbidden gap
Valence band
5- Cost of Area covered
- Detector material could be cheap Standard Si
- Most cost in readout channels
- Material budget
- Radiation length can be significant
- Tracking due to multiple scattering
- Radiation damage
- Replace often or design very well
6- One of the crucial keys to solid state
electronics is the nature of the P-N junction.
When p-type and n-type materials are placed in
contact with each other, the junction behaves
very differently than either type of material
alone. Specifically, current will flow readily in
one direction (forward bias), creating the basic
diode. - Near the junction, electrons diffuse across to
combine with holes, creating a "depletion
region".
7Energy Loss in the Medium
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11Different kind of Silicon detectors
- Charge coupled devices (CCD)
- Silicon pixel, strip detector ( a few hundreds of
micros thick) - Silicon drift detector
- CMOS APS detector Complementary
metaloxidesemiconductor (CMOS) , active pixel
sensor
12CMOS APS
Epitaxy is a kind of interface between a thin
film and a substrate. The term epitaxy (Greek
epi "above" and taxis "in ordered manner")
describes an ordered crystalline growth on a
monocrystalline substrate.
Can use the standard Integrate Circuit production
process for the production. Rely on charge
diffusion instead of drifting.
13- From Equation 1.4 and 1.6, the depletion width is
about 2 µm under normal reset condition. - the bulk of the p-epi region is free of electric
field and the minority carriers diffuse rather
than drift in this region
14RHIC STAR Experiment
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17Input for the simulator
- For the charged particles The number of ionized
electrons/hole pairs. - Energy deposition in the detector volume.
- StMcTrack-gtdE().
- H. Matis for thin layer of material better use
the Bichsel distribution, - H. Bichsel, "Straggling in Thin Silicon
Detectors," Review in Modern Physics, vol. 60,
pp. 663, 1988 - GEANT has implement other models for the thin
layers energy fluctuations under different
limitation of applications - Urban model
- 1 PAI model
- 2 ASHO model for 1
- Will use the Bichsel distribution as input since
its tested with the experiment. - For neutral particles including photons, the
energy deposition in StMcTrack will be used to
generate the number of ionizing electron/hole
pairs unless we have other models for these
particles.
18- For charged track,
- the ionized electron/hole pairs originate
randomly alone the track. - Number of ionized electrons is E/3.6eV where E is
the energy deposition from the Bichsel
distribution. - For photons and neutral particles
- No good reference to my knowledge.
- Si detector should have very low efficiency for
high energy gamma-ray due to pair production. - Two possible ways to deal with it
- Will use the GEANT to get energy deposition from
the gamma-ray or neutral particles and assume all
ionized electrons are from the point where gamma
and silicon interact. (not quite reasonable) - Use Bischsel distribution if we the pair
production vertex for high energy photons and the
electron pair tracks (I think we should know). - For low energy gamma-rays, use the energy
deposition from GEANT.
19Boundary conditions questions fo hardware
experts.
- whats the gap between pWell and nWell?
- Are they fully depleted?
- If the gap is zero, what are the depletion
thickness? - Whats the thickness of p-epi layer? (14
microns?) - Whats the substrate thichness, i.e. 50um-p_epi?
- Whats the size of the p-well and n-well?
- Whats the shape? Is the cubic shape reasonable
approximation?
N Well
p Well
p Well
p-epi layer
p substrate
20- when the p substrate electron hit p-epi/p
substrate interface, the interface is totally
transparent.
- When the electron fall into the depletion region
between N-Well and P-Well or the N_well region,
it will be fully collected into the readout
electronics. - Electrons in the p-well region will be neglected.
p Well
- When electrons hit the n-well/p-epi depletion
region, has very little chance to be reflected
but pass through. Consequently, the n-well/p-epi
interface can be recognized as a boundary with
total absorption - When electron hits the p-epi and p-well
interface, the p-well/p-epi interface can be
recognized as a boundary with total reflection
for electrons in the epitaxial silicon because
pWell are more heavily doped and field in the
depletion region will reflect the electron away.
- when the p-epi electron hit p-epi/p substrate,
because p is more heavy doped, interface is
recognized as a - boundary with total reflection for electrons in
the epitaxial silicon
21Question on interface between pixels.
Will the boundary be total transparent to the
electrons going across the pixel boundaries?
22- electron will recombine with the lattice during
the diffusion and can not reach the electronics. - We used 10 µs as the electron lifetime in the
epitaxial silicon after going over a number of
references 37, 43, 45, 46 . Plugging it into
Equation 2.48, we obtain a recombination rate on
the order of 10-7. As the precise lifetime
depends on material properties that is only
available through experimental measurement, these
estimated values serves only as the starting
point for simulation and they need to be refined
by comparing the simulation with the measurements
(see page 40 of the Shengdongs thesis). - in the p-substrate region and p-well region,
much higher doping density than p-epi and the
quality is also lower, the electron lifetime in
p-substrate is much shorter. Similar to the
method in dealing with the epitaxial silicon, a
lifetime of 10 ns is estimated for electrons in
the bulk substrate and the corresponding
recombination rate is on the order of 10-4.
(see page 41 of shengdongs thesis).
p Well
23Other simulation details
- Diffusion simulation see page 17-page21 of
Shendongs thesis. - The time increment ?t used is on the order of
10-12 s, similar to those reported in references
22, 28, 42, 47, quite close to the average
collision time in Drude model48. Using an
electron diffusion coefficient (Dn) 35 cm2/s,
the step size s from Equation 2.47 is about 80
nm, once again close to the mean-free-path of
electrons in silicon estimated by Drude model
(page42) - The charge recombination simulation in page 46
- Total integration time is 200us.
- This is the end of diffusion?
- If therere still electron diffusion after this
time - We will keep it and add it to the simulation for
the next track hit the same pixel. This might
have an impact for pileup - But according to Shengdongs thesis, this effect
is very small. - A computationally convenient depth is usually
selected as a total absorption boundary where
electrons crossing it will not be counted anymore
due to recombination. This topic will be treated
systematically in Chapter 4 and Chapter 5.