Comparing the two representations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Comparing the two representations

Description:

Title: The Independent Domain Model for Hysteresis Last modified by: Jan Boll Created Date: 10/17/1996 8:08:46 PM Document presentation format: Custom – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: uid82
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparing the two representations


1
Comparing the two representations
2
1962 Poulovasilis Data-model
3
Did it graphically, now mathematically
  • Stated mathematically as integrating over the
    domain of filled pores.
  • Main wetting
  • Main Draining
  • Defining the
  • turning point as
  • Primary wetting

4
Notation for hysteretic process
  • Need to keep track of turning points
  • Subscripts denote the order of pressures, and
    relative position indicates whether the
    transition was wetting or drying. In the case
    shown, the media wetted from h0 to h1, dried to
    h2, and then re-wetted to the present pressure h.

5
dis-functional
  • Curly brackets ? is not a function of h but
    is a functional of h. There is not a one-to-one
    mapping between ? and h without consideration of
    the antecedent conditions.
  • Can relate ? and h from a known initial state and
    through a known sequence of either ? or h as
    stated in equation 2.66

6
How to obtain joint density function?
  • Carry out a terrific number of experiments where
    you map out the entire domain of possible filling
    and draining pressures to obtain f(he,hf) by
    brute force.
  • With computer control this is feasible using an
    automated pressure cell.

7
Similarity Theories
  • 1973 Mualem introduced a simplification of this
    model noted that the joint density function
    f(he,hf) could be well approximated by the
    product of two univariate density functions
  • f(he,hf) g(he)l(hf) 2.67
  • g() and l() are probability density functions
    that depend only on he and hf, respectively.
  • The filling pressure distributions are the same,
    up to a constant multiplier, along draining
    pressure lines
  • Using this, only need the main filling and
    emptying curves to obtain g() and l().

8
Graphical Representation
  • Similarity assumption of Mualem (1973)

9
Mualems similarity data-model
10
And to make life even easier...
  • Parlange (1976) similarity model based on data
    from the main draining curve alone is sufficient
    to reproduce the full family of scanning curves.

11
Parlanges model-data
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com