Strategy for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Strategy for

Description:

Strategy for Interactive Calibration of the Sacramento Model Using NWSRFS Interactive Calibration Program (ICP) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: More207
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strategy for


1
Strategy for Interactive Calibration of
the Sacramento Model Using NWSRFS Interactive
Calibration Program (ICP)
2
General Considerations when using ICP
  • Change duration/scale depending on flow
  • components/parameters being examined
  • Remove large errors in parameter values
    whenever
  • detected
  • Periodically return to previous steps to
    recheck results
  • Primary statistics to periodically examine
  • annual bias
  • seasonal bias
  • flow interval bias
  • Remain flexible
  • Think! Ask questions before you view the
    simulation
  • What do I expect to see?
  • What secondary effects could I see?
  • Why didnt I see what I expected?

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Sacramento Model Calibration Strategy
  • Start with a priori parameters
  • 1. Remove large errors, especially volume
  • 2. Adjust low flow parameters to get a
  • reasonable baseflow simulation
  • 3. Adjust tension water capacities
  • 4. Adjust parameters that primarily affect storm
    runoff
  • 5. Final adjustments to improve seasonal
  • and flow interval bias patterns

7
Snow-17 Calibration Strategy
  • Remove large errors,
  • timing of snowmelt runoff.
  • form of precipitation
  • Adjust major parameters
  • MFMAX, MFMIN
  • SCF
  • UADJ
  • SI

8
Sacramento Model Calibration
  • Each parameter is designed to represent a
    specific portion of the hydrograph under certain
    moisture conditions
  • Concentrate on having each parameter serve its
    primary function rather than overall goodness of
    fit.

9
Sacramento Model Calibration Strategy
Step 1 Remove Large Errors
  • Check water balance annual bias should be less
    than 10-20
  • Check for large timing errors, most common
  • Storm runoff/baseflow ration in error (raise or
    lower entire percolation curve)
  • Amount of surface runoff incorrect (adjust UZFWM)
  • Improper channel response function for Sacramento
    Model (remove interflow from channel response
    unit hydrograph)

10
Sacramento Model Calibration StrategyStep 2
Reasonable baseflow simulation
  • Identify primary baseflow component
  • Adjust key parameters
  • LZPK, LZSK, LZFPM, LZFSM, PFREE
  • May need to adjust ZPERC and REXP
  • Determine if riparian evaporation exists and
    determine general magnitude of RIVA (then set
    RIVA back to zero)

11
Sacramento Model Calibration StrategyStep 3
Tension water capacities
  • Determine UZTWM and LZTWM based on periods when
    maximum soil moisture deficits occur.
  • While examining UZTWM, check and adjust value of
    PCTIM

12
Sacramento Model Calibration StrategyStep 4
Storm runoff simulation
  • Get proper division between surface runoff and
    interflow by changing UZFWM
  • Adjust UZK to get correct timing of interflow.
  • Refine percolation curve over large range of
    LZDEFR values
  • Primarily adjust ZPERC and REXP
  • Use ICP percolation analysis feature
  • Determine if ADIMP is needed. If so, determine
    proper value.

13
Sacramento Model Calibration StrategyStep 5
Final Adjustments
  • Determine value of RIVA if riparian evaporation
    exists
  • Adjust ET-Demand values to improve seasonal bias
    pattern (alter by changing monthly PE adjustment
    curve).
  • Refine timing of peaks by modifying channel
    response (unit hydrograph)
  • Raise or lower percolation curve to improve flow
    interval bias pattern by changing LZFSM and LZFPM
    by the same ratio.

14
Parameter Relationships when Watershed Divided
into Sub-Areas
  • Keep parameter values the same, except when the
    hydrograph from one sub-area can be isolated
    (then can modify parameters for the sub-area
    influencing that response).
  • Relationships can be established between certain
    values based on soils, vegetation, etc, (then
    maintain that ration (ratio, diff) as parameter
    values are adjusted.

15
Calibration of HL-RDHM
16
Calibration of SAC Parameters with Scalar
Multipliers
  • Use of scalar multipliers (assumed to be uniform
    over a basin) greatly reduces the number of
    parameters to be calibrated. This assumes the
    spatial distribution of a-priori parameters is
    realistic.
  • Parameters from 1-hour, lumped model calibrations
    can be a good starting point. Lumped model
    parameters, if derived at the 1 hour time scale,
    can be used to derive initial scalar multipliers,
    i.e.
  • multiplier lumped model parameter/basin
    average of gridded a-priori parameter values
  • Scalar multipliers are adjusted using similar
    strategies and objectives to those for lumped
    calibration
  • Both manual and a combination of automatic and
    manual calibration on scalar multipliers have
    proven effective

17
Comparison Between Calibration Steps for
Distributed and Lumped Modeling
Distributed
Lumped
Distributed
Lumped
18
Manual Headwater Calibration
  • Follow similar strategies to those used for
    lumped calibration except make changes to
    multipliers, e.g. from Anderson (2002)
  • Remove large errors
  • Obtain reasonable simulation of baseflow
  • Adjust major snow model parameters, if snow is
    included\
  • Adjust tension water capacities
  • Adjust parameters that primarily affect storm
    runoff
  • Make final parameter adjustments

Can still use PLOT-TS and STAT-QME
  • Stat-Q event statistics summarize how well you
    do on bias, peaks, timing, and RMSE, etc over any
    of selected events.
  • R scripts assist with routing parameter
    adjustment.

See HL-RDHM User Manual for a detailed example.
19
HL-RDHM
P, T ET
SNOW -17
rain melt
Auto Calibration
SAC-SMA, SAC-HT
surface runoff
Execute these components in a loop to find the
set of scalar multipliers that minimize the
objective function
base flow
Hillslope routing
Channel routing
Flows and state variables
20
Multi-Scale Objective Function (MSOF)
Emulates multi-scale nature of manual calibration
  • Minimize errors over hourly, daily, weekly,
    monthly intervals (k1,2,3,4n)
  • q flow averaged over time interval k
  • n number of flow intervals for averaging
  • mk number of ordinates for each interval
  • X parameter set

-Assumes uncertainty in simulated streamflow is
proportional to the variability of the observed
flow -Inversely proportional to the errors at the
respective scales. Assume errors approximated by
std.
Weight
21
Auto Calibration Case 2
Example of HL-RDHM Auto Calibration ELDO2 for
DMIP 2 Arithmetic Scale
After autocalibration
Before autocalibration of a priori parameters
Observed
22
Possible Strategy
  • Start with best a-priori or scaled lumped
    parameters
  • Run automatic calibration
  • Make manual adjustments (particularly for
    routing parameters) to get the preferred storm
    event shapes

23
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com