Title: Strategy for
1Strategy for Interactive Calibration of
the Sacramento Model Using NWSRFS Interactive
Calibration Program (ICP)
2General Considerations when using ICP
- Change duration/scale depending on flow
- components/parameters being examined
- Remove large errors in parameter values
whenever - detected
- Periodically return to previous steps to
recheck results - Primary statistics to periodically examine
- annual bias
- seasonal bias
- flow interval bias
- Remain flexible
- Think! Ask questions before you view the
simulation - What do I expect to see?
- What secondary effects could I see?
- Why didnt I see what I expected?
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6Sacramento Model Calibration Strategy
- Start with a priori parameters
- 1. Remove large errors, especially volume
- 2. Adjust low flow parameters to get a
- reasonable baseflow simulation
- 3. Adjust tension water capacities
- 4. Adjust parameters that primarily affect storm
runoff - 5. Final adjustments to improve seasonal
- and flow interval bias patterns
7Snow-17 Calibration Strategy
- Remove large errors,
- timing of snowmelt runoff.
- form of precipitation
- Adjust major parameters
- MFMAX, MFMIN
- SCF
- UADJ
- SI
8Sacramento Model Calibration
- Each parameter is designed to represent a
specific portion of the hydrograph under certain
moisture conditions - Concentrate on having each parameter serve its
primary function rather than overall goodness of
fit.
9Sacramento Model Calibration Strategy
Step 1 Remove Large Errors
- Check water balance annual bias should be less
than 10-20 - Check for large timing errors, most common
- Storm runoff/baseflow ration in error (raise or
lower entire percolation curve) - Amount of surface runoff incorrect (adjust UZFWM)
- Improper channel response function for Sacramento
Model (remove interflow from channel response
unit hydrograph)
10Sacramento Model Calibration StrategyStep 2
Reasonable baseflow simulation
- Identify primary baseflow component
- Adjust key parameters
- LZPK, LZSK, LZFPM, LZFSM, PFREE
- May need to adjust ZPERC and REXP
- Determine if riparian evaporation exists and
determine general magnitude of RIVA (then set
RIVA back to zero)
11Sacramento Model Calibration StrategyStep 3
Tension water capacities
- Determine UZTWM and LZTWM based on periods when
maximum soil moisture deficits occur. - While examining UZTWM, check and adjust value of
PCTIM
12Sacramento Model Calibration StrategyStep 4
Storm runoff simulation
- Get proper division between surface runoff and
interflow by changing UZFWM - Adjust UZK to get correct timing of interflow.
- Refine percolation curve over large range of
LZDEFR values - Primarily adjust ZPERC and REXP
- Use ICP percolation analysis feature
- Determine if ADIMP is needed. If so, determine
proper value.
13Sacramento Model Calibration StrategyStep 5
Final Adjustments
- Determine value of RIVA if riparian evaporation
exists - Adjust ET-Demand values to improve seasonal bias
pattern (alter by changing monthly PE adjustment
curve). - Refine timing of peaks by modifying channel
response (unit hydrograph) - Raise or lower percolation curve to improve flow
interval bias pattern by changing LZFSM and LZFPM
by the same ratio.
14Parameter Relationships when Watershed Divided
into Sub-Areas
- Keep parameter values the same, except when the
hydrograph from one sub-area can be isolated
(then can modify parameters for the sub-area
influencing that response). - Relationships can be established between certain
values based on soils, vegetation, etc, (then
maintain that ration (ratio, diff) as parameter
values are adjusted.
15Calibration of HL-RDHM
16Calibration of SAC Parameters with Scalar
Multipliers
- Use of scalar multipliers (assumed to be uniform
over a basin) greatly reduces the number of
parameters to be calibrated. This assumes the
spatial distribution of a-priori parameters is
realistic. - Parameters from 1-hour, lumped model calibrations
can be a good starting point. Lumped model
parameters, if derived at the 1 hour time scale,
can be used to derive initial scalar multipliers,
i.e. - multiplier lumped model parameter/basin
average of gridded a-priori parameter values - Scalar multipliers are adjusted using similar
strategies and objectives to those for lumped
calibration - Both manual and a combination of automatic and
manual calibration on scalar multipliers have
proven effective
17Comparison Between Calibration Steps for
Distributed and Lumped Modeling
Distributed
Lumped
Distributed
Lumped
18Manual Headwater Calibration
- Follow similar strategies to those used for
lumped calibration except make changes to
multipliers, e.g. from Anderson (2002) - Remove large errors
- Obtain reasonable simulation of baseflow
- Adjust major snow model parameters, if snow is
included\ - Adjust tension water capacities
- Adjust parameters that primarily affect storm
runoff - Make final parameter adjustments
Can still use PLOT-TS and STAT-QME
- Stat-Q event statistics summarize how well you
do on bias, peaks, timing, and RMSE, etc over any
of selected events. - R scripts assist with routing parameter
adjustment. -
See HL-RDHM User Manual for a detailed example.
19HL-RDHM
P, T ET
SNOW -17
rain melt
Auto Calibration
SAC-SMA, SAC-HT
surface runoff
Execute these components in a loop to find the
set of scalar multipliers that minimize the
objective function
base flow
Hillslope routing
Channel routing
Flows and state variables
20Multi-Scale Objective Function (MSOF)
Emulates multi-scale nature of manual calibration
- Minimize errors over hourly, daily, weekly,
monthly intervals (k1,2,3,4n) - q flow averaged over time interval k
- n number of flow intervals for averaging
- mk number of ordinates for each interval
- X parameter set
-Assumes uncertainty in simulated streamflow is
proportional to the variability of the observed
flow -Inversely proportional to the errors at the
respective scales. Assume errors approximated by
std.
Weight
21Auto Calibration Case 2
Example of HL-RDHM Auto Calibration ELDO2 for
DMIP 2 Arithmetic Scale
After autocalibration
Before autocalibration of a priori parameters
Observed
22Possible Strategy
- Start with best a-priori or scaled lumped
parameters - Run automatic calibration
- Make manual adjustments (particularly for
routing parameters) to get the preferred storm
event shapes
23(No Transcript)