Harold Garfinkel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Harold Garfinkel

Description:

People aren't important (socially) unless they are part of that world ... 'Ethnomethodology' the methods people use to understand the world and thereby ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1064
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: eckb
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Harold Garfinkel


1
Harold Garfinkel
  • He wants you to question the reality of the
    social world

2
Background
  • Spencer, Durkheim, Comte
  • social world is real
  • Social facts are real
  • People arent important (socially) unless they
    are part of that world
  • People play roles in important institutions
    (organs?) but are mainly replaceable

3
Question How do we know what the social world is
really like?
  • The invisibility problem we dont directly
    see what the world is like
  • No two situations or examples we see (e.g.,
    families) are identical
  • We know the social world via our ideas about it
  • Alfred Schutz, the phenomenological philosopher
    (who liked Weber) called these typifications

4
Typifications
  • Apply to people
  • What is the person youre sitting next to like?
  • Information
  • Surface impressions (e.g., Goffman presentation
    of self)
  • Information from others
  • Information from documents and other artifacts
  • Five categories of knowing people
  • Myself (the one you know the best)
  • We relationships (you see him or her all the
    time)
  • Contemporaries (others who live at this time)
  • Predecessors (those who are gone)
  • Successors (those who arent here yet)

5
Typifications (cont)
  • Apply to social situations
  • Schutz calls situations the lifeworld the
    world as we know and experience it
  • We each have a stock of knowledge from our
    experiences
  • We use this to define situations (remember
    this?)
  • Things directly experienced are more real to us
    but rare
  • Every situation varies from every other one by
  • Time
  • Place
  • Specific events, etc.
  • We get by a lot on
  • recipes
  • Habits
  • Routine knowledge
  • We dont ( and couldnt) think through every
    detail of every situation

6
To sum (from Schutz)
  • We constantly must try to understand the people
    we meet
  • We constantly must try to understand the
    situations we are in
  • We draw on hunches, what weve heard, what weve
    seen, whats worked in the past recipes for
    understanding and action
  • We dont test these much were not like
    scientists testing theories

7
Harold Garfinkel
  • So how does the social world keep existing at
    all?
  • It doesnt unless we act like it does
  • We create and recreate it by acting as though it
    exists though it exists only as typifications
  • Dont believe me? Garfinkel shows, via
    experiments, that people can make a new social
    reality exist by acting as though it exists.
  • Ethnomethodology the methods people use to
    understand the world and thereby to create it
    anew in every situation

8
Harold Garfinkel
  • The things he says people do to make a situation
    fall into a routine category
  • Look at the counselor experiment Pp. 187-195
  • Documentary method looking for and counting
    up reasons to accept that the situation is what
    you already think it is.
  • Etc. clause assuming that info you dont have
    would support your belief, and that you know
    enough for the moment.

9
Implications?
  • For everything
  • Tomorrow Labeling theory
  • Categorizing everything and issues of
    false-positives and false-negatives.
  • Example

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com