STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS

Description:

... initiated rather than worker initiated work stoppage during a bargaining impasse. ... party investigates a bargaining impasse and issues non-binding ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:5359
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: McGrawHill216
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS


1
STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS
  • Strikes
  • Occur when employees refuse to work until an
    employer changes its position on one or more
    issues.
  • Also intended to pressure the employerby
    withholding their labor, strikers seek to
    increase the employers cost of disagreement by
    depriving the employer of profits (private
    sector) or the ability to satisfy the demands of
    taxpayers and voters (public sector).
  • If such actions are costly enough, the employer
    will accept the employees demands and settle the
    strike.

2
STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS
  • When employees strike to win better wages,
    benefits, and work rules the strike is considered
    an economic strike.
  • Economic strikes are the most common frequent of
    strike in U.S. labor relations.
  • Closely related to an economic strike is a
    lockoutan employer initiated rather than worker
    initiated work stoppage during a bargaining
    impasse.
  • It is important to differentiate between types of
    strikes because U.S. legal doctrine in the
    private sector is different for each one.

3
TYPES OF STRIKES
4
PICKET LINES
  • Workers, their leaders, and their supporters
    march outside the struck employers location(s)
    to publicize their dispute, convince the public
    not to patronize the business and workers not to
    cross the picket line, create solidarity among
    the strikers, and otherwise build support for
    their cause.
  • In economic and unfair labor practice strikes,
    picketing is legal but is not without legal
    limitations.
  • Picketing raises several important issuessuch as
    what about employees who want to work instead of
    strike and therefore cross their own unions
    picket line.

5
PUBLIC SECTOR STRIKES
  • All types of strikes are more likely to be
    illegal when conducted by government employees.
  • Prohibiting public sector strikes is rooted in
    several traditional beliefs
  • That striking against the government is an
    unacceptable threat to the supreme authority of
    the government
  • That public sector employee bargaining power is
    too high because there are no market-based checks
    on their demands
  • That government services are too critical to be
    interrupted.
  • Strikes by federal government workers are
    prohibited and only 25 of states grant even a
    limited right to strike.

6
NATIONAL EMERGENCY STRIKES
  • Like in the public sector, there is a concern in
    the private sector law with strikes that
    seriously harm the public interest.
  • Because of the critical importance of railroads
    in the early 20th century economy, the Railway
    Labor Act empowers the president of the United
    States to create a Presidential Emergency Board
    if a strike would threaten substantially to
    interrupt interstate commerce.

7
MAJOR U.S. STRIKES, 1950-2002
8
STRIKE REPLACEMENTS
  • Employees used or hired to do the work of
    individuals on strike are called strike
    replacements or replacement workers (or in the
    most derogatory language, scabs).
  • Strikers that have been replaced permanently
    replaced are not necessarily entitled to
    immediate reinstatement back to their old jobs
    once they end their strike.
  • A 1938 Supreme Court ruling (NLRB v. Mackay Radio
    and Telegraph Co.) established that absent
    discrimination based on union activity, both
    temporary and permanent strike replacements are
    legal.
  • Is the strike threat viable anymore?

9
BOYCOTTS
  • A boycott is a campaign to encourage a companys
    customers to stop doing business with it.
  • In a bargaining dispute in the U.S. private
    sector, a boycott is generally legal if it
    narrowly targets the company directly involved in
    the dispute.
  • Section 8(b)(4) of the NLRA prohibits secondary
    boycottsboycotts that target secondary rather
    than primary employers.

10
WORK SLOWDOWNS
  • Slowdowns try to pressure employers by imposing
    cost through lowered productivity, but without
    employees leaving their jobs.
  • The most creative type of slowdown is a
    work-to-rule campaign
  • Refusing to work overtime is a partial strike.
  • A series of repeated quickie strikes amounts to
    an intermittent strike.
  • The basic goal of these job actions is to disrupt
    the employers operations, and at the same time
    make it difficult for employers to hire
    replacements.

11
THIRD-PARTY DISPUTE RESOLUTION
  • Third-party dispute resolution mechanisms use a
    neutral third party to settle bargaining impasses
    with the goal of avoiding costly strikes.
  • In the private sector, property rights and the
    freedom to enter into contracts means that
    third-party dispute resolution is generally
    voluntary.
  • In the public sector, the primacy of serving the
    public interest means that third-party dispute
    resolution is often compulsory.
  • Third-party dispute resolution mechanisms are
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Fact-finding

12
INTEREST ARBITRATON
  • Interest arbitration is designed to resolve
    interest disputes that result in new contractual
    terms that govern wages and terms and conditions
    of employment.
  • Two primary forms of interest arbitration
  • Conventional arbitration
  • Final offer arbitration
  • total package
  • issue-by-issue
  • As with mediation, interest arbitration is
    voluntary in the private sector and often
    mandatory in the public sector.
  • Most interest arbitration takes place in the
    public sectormore than 20 states have some form
    of compulsory arbitration statute.

13
FACT-FINDING
  • A third party dispute resolution method in which
    a neutral third party investigates a bargaining
    impasse and issues non-binding recommendations
    for a settlement.
  • Is essentially non-binding arbitration.
  • Typically, hearings are held where each side
    presents its case, which is then followed by a
    report containing specific terms of a settlement.
  • Unlike arbitration, fact-finding does not
    guarantee a resolution.
  • Unlike mediation, fact-finding does little to
    help the negotiating process in order to
    facilitate productive bargaining and a
    settlement.
  • In fact, fact-finding appears to increase labor
    conflict relative to public sector jurisdictions
    that settle disputes with strikes or arbitration.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com