EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS

Description:

And the Initial Power Flow Jacobian. And the Hand Calculation Details! ... sizes are quite large, this means the Ybus and Jacobian matrices are also large. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:591
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: ecep7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS


1
EE 369POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
  • Lecture 14Power Flow
  • Tom Overbye and Ross Baldick

2
Announcements
  • Read Chapter 12, concentrating on sections 12.4
    and 12.5.
  • Homework 12 is 6.43, 6.48, 6.59, 6.61, 12.19,
    12.22, 12.20, 12.24, 12.26, 12.28, 12.29 due
    Tuesday Nov. 25.

3
The N-R Power Flow 5-bus Example
Single-line diagram
4
The N-R Power Flow 5-bus Example
Bus Type V per unit ? degrees PG per unit QG per unit PL per unit QL per unit QGmax per unit QGmin per unit
1 Slack 1.0 0 ? ? 0 0 ? ?
2 Load ? ? 0 0 8.0 2.8 ? ?
3 Constant voltage 1.05 ? 5.2 ? 0.8 0.4 4.0 -2.8
4 Load ? ? 0 0 0 0 ? ?
5 Load ? ? 0 0 0 0 ? ?
Table 1. Bus input data
Bus-to-Bus R per unit X per unit G per unit B per unit Maximum MVA per unit
2-4 0.0090 0.100 0 1.72 12.0
2-5 0.0045 0.050 0 0.88 12.0
4-5 0.00225 0.025 0 0.44 12.0
Table 2. Line input data
5
The N-R Power Flow 5-bus Example
Bus-to-Bus R per unit X per unit Gc per unit Bm per unit Maximum MVA per unit Maximum TAP Setting per unit
1-5 0.00150 0.02 0 0 6.0
3-4 0.00075 0.01 0 0 10.0
Table 3. Transformer input data
Bus Input Data Unknowns
1 V1 1.0, ?1 0 P1, Q1
2 P2 PG2-PL2 -8 Q2 QG2-QL2 -2.8 V2, ?2
3 V3 1.05 P3 PG3-PL3 4.4 Q3, ?3
4 P4 0, Q4 0 V4, ?4
5 P5 0, Q5 0 V5, ?5
Table 4. Input data and unknowns
6
Let the Computer Do the Calculations! (Ybus Shown)
7
Ybus Details
8
Here are the Initial Bus Mismatches
9
And the Initial Power Flow Jacobian
10
Five Bus Power System Solved
11
37 Bus Example Design Case
12
Good Power System Operation
  • Good power system operation requires that there
    be no reliability violations (needing to shed
    load, have cascading outages, or other
    unacceptable conditions) for either the current
    condition or in the event of statistically likely
    contingencies
  • Reliability requires as a minimum that there be
    no transmission line/transformer limit violations
    and that bus voltages be within acceptable limits
    (perhaps 0.95 to 1.08)
  • Example contingencies are the loss of any single
    device. This is known as n-1 reliability.

13
Good Power System Operation
  • North American Electric Reliability Corporation
    now has legal authority to enforce reliability
    standards (and there are now lots of them).
  • See http//www.nerc.com for details (click on
    Standards)

14
Looking at the Impact of Line Outages
Opening one line (Tim69- Hannah69) causes
overloads. This would not be Allowed.
15
Contingency Analysis
Contingencyanalysis providesan automaticway of
lookingat all the statisticallylikely
contingencies. Inthis example thecontingency
set is all the single line/transformeroutages
16
Power Flow And Design
  • One common usage of the power flow is to
    determine how the system should be modified to
    remove contingencies problems or serve new load
  • In an operational context this requires working
    with the existing electric grid, typically
    involving re-dispatch of generation.
  • In a planning context additions to the grid can
    be considered as well as re-dispatch.
  • In the next example we look at how to remove the
    existing contingency violations while serving new
    load.

17
An Unreliable Solutionsome line outages result
in overloads
Case now has nine separate contingencies
having reliability violations (overloads in
post-contingency system).
18
A Reliable Solutionno line outages result in
overloads
Previous case was augmented with the addition
of a 138 kV Transmission Line
19
Generation Changes and The Slack Bus
  • The power flow is a steady-state analysis tool,
    so the assumption is total load plus losses is
    always equal to total generation
  • Generation mismatch is made up at the slack bus
  • When doing generation change power flow studies
    one always needs to be cognizant of where the
    generation is being made up
  • Common options include distributed slack, where
    the mismatch is distributed across multiple
    generators by participation factors or by
    economics.

20
Generation Change Example 1
Display shows Difference Flows between
original 37 bus case, and case with a BLT138
generation outage note all the power change
is picked up at the slack
Slack bus
21
Generation Change Example 2
Display repeats previous case except now the
change in generation is picked up by other
generators using a participation factor
(change is shared amongst generators) approach.
22
Voltage Regulation Example 37 Buses
Automatic voltage regulation system controls
voltages.
Display shows voltage contour of the power system
23
Real-sized Power Flow Cases
  • Real power flow studies are usually done with
    cases with many thousands of buses
  • Outside of ERCOT, buses are usually grouped into
    various balancing authority areas, with each area
    doing its own interchange control.
  • Cases also model a variety of different automatic
    control devices, such as generator reactive power
    limits, load tap changing transformers, phase
    shifting transformers, switched capacitors, HVDC
    transmission lines, and (potentially) FACTS
    devices.

24
Sparse Matrices and Large Systems
  • Since for realistic power systems the model sizes
    are quite large, this means the Ybus and Jacobian
    matrices are also large.
  • However, most elements in these matrices are
    zero, therefore special techniques, sparse
    matrix/vector methods, are used to store the
    values and solve the power flow
  • Without these techniques large systems would be
    essentially unsolvable.

25
Eastern Interconnect Example
Example, which models the Eastern
Interconnectcontains about 43,000 buses.
26
Solution Log for 1200 MW Outage
In this example thelosss of a 1200 MWgenerator
in NorthernIllinois was simulated. This caused
a generation imbalancein the associated
balancing authorityarea, which wascorrected by
a redispatch of localgeneration.
27
Interconnected Operation
  • Power systems are interconnected across large
    distances.
  • For example most of North America east of the
    Rockies is one system, most of North America west
    of the Rockies is another.
  • Most of Texas and Quebec are each interconnected
    systems.

28
Balancing Authority Areas
  • A balancing authority area (previously called a
    control area) has traditionally represented the
    portion of the interconnected electric grid
    operated by a single utility or transmission
    entity.
  • Transmission lines that join two areas are known
    as tie-lines.
  • The net power out of an area is the sum of the
    flow on its tie-lines.
  • The flow out of an area is equal to total gen -
    total load - total losses tie-line flow

29
Area Control Error (ACE)
  • The area control error is a combination of
  • the deviation of frequency from nominal, and
  • the difference between the actual flow out of an
    area and the scheduled (agreed) flow.
  • That is, the area control error (ACE) is the
    difference between the actual flow out of an area
    minus the scheduled flow, plus a frequency
    deviation component
  • ACE provides a measure of whether an area is
    producing more or less than it should to satisfy
    schedules and to contribute to controlling
    frequency.

30
Area Control Error (ACE)
  • The ideal is for ACE to be zero.
  • Because the load is constantly changing, each
    area must constantly change its generation to
    drive the ACE towards zero.
  • For ERCOT, the historical ten control areas were
    amalgamated into one in 2001, so the actual and
    scheduled interchange are essentially the same
    (both small compared to total demand in ERCOT).
  • In ERCOT, ACE is predominantly due to frequency
    deviations from nominal since there is very
    little scheduled flow to or from other areas.

31
Automatic Generation Control
  • Most systems use automatic generation control
    (AGC) to automatically change generation to keep
    their ACE close to zero.
  • Usually the control center (either ISO or
    utility) calculates ACE based upon tie-line flows
    and frequency then the AGC module sends control
    signals out to the generators every four seconds
    or so.

32
Power Transactions
  • Power transactions are contracts between
    generators and (representatives of) loads.
  • Contracts can be for any amount of time at any
    price for any amount of power.
  • Scheduled power transactions between balancing
    areas are called interchange and implemented by
    setting the value of Psched used in the ACE
    calculation
  • ACE Pactual tie-line flow Psched 10ß ?f
  • and then controlling the generation to bring ACE
    towards zero.

33
Physical power Transactions
  • For ERCOT, interchange is only relevant over
    asynchronous connections between ERCOT and
    Eastern Interconnection or Mexico.
  • In Eastern and Western Interconnection,
    interchange occurs between areas connected by AC
    lines.

34
Three Bus Case on AGCno interchange.
Generation is automatically changed to
match change in load
Net tie-line flow is close to zero
35
100 MW Transaction between areas in Eastern or
Western
Scheduled 100 MW Transaction from Left to Right
Net tie-line flow is now 100 MW
36
PTDFs
  • Power transfer distribution factors (PTDFs) show
    the linearized impact of a transfer of power.
  • PTDFs calculated using the fast decoupled power
    flow B matrix

37
Nine Bus PTDF Example
Figure shows initial flows for a nine bus power
system
38
Nine Bus PTDF Example, cont'd
Figure now shows percentage PTDF flows for a
change in transaction from A to I
39
Nine Bus PTDF Example, cont'd
Figure now shows percentage PTDF flows for a
change in transaction from G to F
40
WE to TVA PTDFs
41
Line Outage Distribution Factors (LODFs)
  • LODFs are used to approximate the change in the
    flow on one line caused by the outage of a second
    line
  • typically they are only used to determine the
    change in the MW flow compared to the
    pre-contingency flow if a contingency were to
    occur,
  • LODFs are used extensively in real-time
    operations,
  • LODFs are approximately independent of flows but
    do depend on the assumed network topology.

42
Line Outage Distribution Factors (LODFs)
43
Line Outage Distribution Factors (LODFs)
44
Flowgates
  • The real-time loading of the power grid can be
    assessed via flowgates.
  • A flowgate flow is the real power flow on one
    or more transmission elements for either base
    case conditions or a single contingency
  • Flows in the event of a contingency are
    approximated in terms of pre-contingency flows
    using LODFs.
  • Elements are chosen so that total flow has a
    relation to an underlying physical limit.

45
Flowgates
  • Limits due to voltage or stability limits are
    often represented by effective flowgate limits,
    which are acting as proxies for these other
    types of limits.
  • Flowgate limits are also often used to represent
    thermal constraints on corridors of multiple
    lines between zones or areas.
  • The inter-zonal constraints that were used in
    ERCOT until December 2010 are flowgates that
    represent inter-zonal corridors of lines.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com