Government of India Policy Reform in Family Welfare Program of India : Community Mobilization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Government of India Policy Reform in Family Welfare Program of India : Community Mobilization

Description:

Decentralized system of planning model is most viable and cost-effective. ... vast number of people, particularly in rural areas , can expect desired level of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1616
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: SuperC2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Government of India Policy Reform in Family Welfare Program of India : Community Mobilization


1
Government of IndiaPolicy Reform in Family
Welfare Program of India Community
Mobilization Community Participation under
Reproductive Child Health Program--------------
----------------------------------Prasanta
Kumar Saha, CStat (UK), Fellow of the Royal
Statistical Society, UK.
2
NEW PLAN MODELFOR FAMILY
WELFARE And RCH PROGRAMME
3
GENESISINDIGENIOUS IDEAS PLANG.
COMMISSION.INTERNATIONAL ICPD 94
4
PLAN MODEL DEFINITIONDecentralized
Participatory Planning being activated through
Community Needs Assessment Approach (CNAA) for
implementing FW / RCH Prog.
5
Characteristics of Community
Participation Model STANDARD
FLEXIBLESYSTEMATIC SIMPLISTIC GRASSROOT
Oriented
6
CHARACTERISTICSContd. BOTTOM-UP
PEOPLESPLANPEOPLES PARTICIPATION
7
PRINCIPAL OBJECTIVES 1.
IMPLEMENTATION OF FAMILY WELFARE AND RCH PROG.
2. TO PROVIDE TO PEOPLEBEST QUALITY SERVICES.
AND 3. ABOLITION OF
EXECUTIVES PRECONCEIVED FUNCTIONAL DESIGN.
8
Preparatory Actions Prior to Introduction
of New Model
  • Abolition of centrally determined method, that is
    abolition of specific targets for family planning
  • through
  • a) Pilot studies in States
  • b) intimating all the State Secretaries of Health
    FW..

9
Preparatory actions contd.
  • c) discussion in the conference of the State
    Secretaries of Health FW.
  • d) discussion in the Conferences of Central
    Council of Health FW who fully endorsed and
    appreciated the new approach.
  • e)Visiting of Central team to States .

10
Steps taken for Operationalisation of
New Approachcontd.
  • 1) A manual was distributed to all States in
    1996-97.
  • 2) Subsequently the same manual was simplified.
  • 3) Simplifying the relevant Formats.
  • 4) Revised manual prepared distributed to all
    the States.
  • 5) Discussion in State Secretaries conference
    every year.

11
Steps taken contd.
  • Secretary, Deptt. of FW, Govt. of India regularly
    writing to State Secretaries of Health/FW.
  • Workshops of District Chief Medical
    Officers/Officers of State Dte. of Health FW
    covering about 300 districts organized in many
    States.

12
Steps Continued
  • National Population Policy 2000 Emphasizing the
    role of the local body at village level called
    Panchayat for furthering decentralized planning.
  • Training to Auxiliary Nurse Midwives ANM and
    Medical Officers MO of PHCs.
    .

13
MECHANISM OF PREPARATION OF ACTION PLAN KEY
COMPONENT OF NEW APPROACH
  • Originated at SUB-CENTERSC level
  • Interactions of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives ANM
    with people.
  • Associating Anganwari Workers/ Womens Groups at
    village level called Mahila Swasth Sanghs MSS
    etc and Panchayat.
  • Checking Consistency of assessment of health care
    needs by ANMs of the citizens particularly at
    village level.
  • Making a meaningful action plan.
  • The Action plan is to be executed by ANM.
  • Action Plan Coverage No selection of clients- it
    is complete coverage of all clients in a
    particular village.

14

Key Issues of Community Participation being
activated through CNAA
  • MICROPLANNING
  • DECISION SUPPORT PLANNING
  • COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
  • CLIENTS PERSPECTIVE
  • QUALITY OF CARE.
  • MICROLEVEL DATABASE
  • MAINTAINING STANDARD RECORDS/FORMATS.
  • REGULAR SYSTEM OF M E OF PRFORMANCE

15
BARRIERS
  • The vertical programme structure inhibiting the
    setting of priorities according to plans.
  • Lack of inter-sectoral coordination reducing the
    effectiveness of plans in the health sector.
  • Infrastructure getting focussed more than the
    functions of District State authorities to meet
    the unmet felt need of health care of the
    community.
  • Apathy of all the implementing authorities.

16
BARRIERS contd.
  • Information system not getting due importance
    by the medical authorities.
  • Some States need more time
  • Some reservation on the part of some States

17
IMPROVED SITUATION
  • Some encouraging signs emerging
  • Process of Panchayati Raj system has started in
    some States.
  • Action plans are being done through
    house-to-house surveys in many districts
  • In some districts of some States Panchayat
    workers are maintaining Birth/ Death registers.
  • However, level of motivation and awareness of
    Panchayat members needs tremendous improvements.

18
Improved Situation contd.
  • Panchayat members are being called in PHC level
    meeting.
  • ANMs are attending meetings of Gram Panchayat.
  • Panchayat members are being trained in
    developmental programmes including health
    services.
  • Training on CNAA to ANMs/ MPW(M)s/Medical
    OfficersMOs is an on- going program.

19
SUMMARY
  • Quality assessment under CNAA is one of the
    principal objectives. This objective has been
    facing lack of sincerity commitment.
  • To establish system of direct interactions with
    the clients, other voluntary agencies
    participation has been considered.
  • Field Evaluation existing system of evaluation
    of quality and status of health care provided by
    the SCs and PHCs contacting the actual clients is
    inadequate.

20
SUMMARY Contd.
  • Decentralized system of planning model is most
    viable and cost-effective.
  • In a developing country like India vast number of
    people, particularly in rural areas , can expect
    desired level of services through this model.
  • Panchayat system, it is expected, will be
    functioning in this direction within a few years.

21
References References1.
Report of the International Conference on
Population and Development, Sept., 1994, Cairo,
Egypt.2. Annual Reports of the Ministry of
Health Family Welfare, Government of India, New
Delhi-1996-97, 1997-98, 1998-99. 3. UNFPA
Technical Report, November, 1999 Planning
Population and Development Projects with a Focus
on Decentralization and Quality of Care.

22
References contd.
  • 4. National Population Policy 2000, Department of
    Family Welfare, Ministry of Health FW, Govt. of
    India, New Delhi.
  • 5. Reproductive and Child Health Program
    Schemes for Implementation, October, 1997, Dept.
    of Family Welfare, Ministry of Health FW, Govt.
    of India.
  • 6. European Commission ECTA Situational
    Analysis, 2001/22, August, 2001 Community Needs
    Assessment Approach CNAA to District Planning.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com