Title: Fuel Savings
1Fuel Savings
2FUEL SAVINGS
- Variable Fuel Consumption Costs
- Mixing Time
- Required Power
- Feed Mixers have different fuel consumption.
- Why?
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5CONSUMPTION TRACTOR SIZE
- John Deere 3100 41 kW/55 HP 11,8
l/h - Same Aster 60 VDT 44 kW/60 HP 12,4
l/h - Same Dorado 70 52kW/65 HP 14,9
l/h - Same Silver 80 VDT 59 kW/75 HP 17,9
l/h - Deutz-Fahr Agroton 90 MK3 65 kW/ 88 HP 19,9 l/h
- Massey Ferguson 4355 74 kW/100 HP 20,7
l/h - Same Antares 110 VDT 81kW/110 HP 22,9 l/h
- Fonte DLG Test
6SABRE VS VERTICAL MIXER
- 11 m³ SABRE 2 AUGERS
- 1 TMR 35 min
- Power need 60 HP
- 1 TMR 7.23 l
- 365 TMR/year x 7.23 2.638,95
- 11 m³ VERTICAL
- 1 TMR 40 min
- Power need 65 HP
- 1 TMR 9.93
- 365 TMR/year x 9.93 3.624,45
Fuel Savings ? 985,50 1 year ? 4.927,50 5
years
7KING VS VERTICAL MIXER
- 11 m³ KING 2 2 AUGERS
- 1 TMR 25 min
- Power need 55 HP
- 1 TMR 4.91 l
- 365 TMR/year x 4.91 1.792.15
- 11 m³ VERTICAL
- 1 TMR 40 min
- Power need 60 HP
- 1 TMR 9.93
- 365 TMR/year x 9.93 3.624,45
Fuel Savings ? 1.832,30 1 year ? 9.161,50 5
years
8KING VS SABRE
- 11 m³ KING 2 2 AUGERS
- 1 TMR 25 min
- Power need 55 HP
- 1 TMR 4.91 l
- 365 TMR/year x 4.91 1.792.15
- 11 m³ SABRE 2 AUGERS
- 1 TMR 35 min
- Power need 65 HP
- 1 TMR 7.23
- 365 TMR/year x 7.23 2.638,95
Fuel Savings ? 846,8 1 year ? 4.234,00 5
years
940/4530/3520/25
TIME FACTOR
1065 HP60 HP55 HP
POWER FACTOR
11WHAT IS THE T.M.R?
- The theoretical assumption on which this device
is based is that the animal, when eating a food
mixture prepared in the correct way, takes an
optimal sample of its rations in each mouthful,
containing all the dietiary ingredients in their
correct ratio. - The term unifeed identifies a preparation
technique for rations based on shredding and
mixing the different diet ingredients with the
help of a suitable device - THE FEED-MIXER
12VANTAGE OF T.M.R
- In comparison with the traditional type of
feeding, which does not allow for mixing forage
and concentrates, the use of the unifeed
shredder-mixer allows a series of advantages for
feeding and management - it reduces the animals ability to select the
more appetising foods in its diet, so that their
consumption is diluted over the entire day. - it stimulates an increase in the consumption of
drystuff - it guarantees more uniform and constant
conditions in the rumen, and so avoids - marked peaks in fermentation, with consequent
falls in pH - it reduces the risk of metabolic disorders
- it allows foods which are less appetising to be
used - it reduces the time needed, and simplifies the
operation, of distributing food. - In the last analysis, this means a state of
improved wellbeing for the animal, with a
consequent improvement in its production.
13ORGANISATION - Daily food distribution -
Flexibility in diary management - Reduced labour
costs - Better animal control - Lighter work
- BREEDING STRUCTURE
- - Better flexibility in partition of functional
areas - Easier structures
FEEDING TECHNIQUE - Perfect recipe preparation -
Broader range of products which can be used -
The animal cannot choose single components -
Waste reduced NUTRITION - Constant rumen pH -
Better dry matter intake - Better use of
nutritional principles
PRODUCTION - More constant lactation curve -
Higher milk production per head - Higher milk fat
content
HEALTH ASPECTS - Reduced mastits - Reduced feet
infections - Reduced bad metabolism
BEHAVIOUR - Reduced competition in the trough -
Quieter animals