Title: HIV Among African Americans
1HIV Among African Americans
- Nina T. Harawa, MPH, PhD
- Assistant Professor
- Charles Drew University/UCLA
2Objectives
- To review the epidemiology of HIV among Black
people in the US - Discuss the role of sexual networks in HIV
epidemics - To discuss possible reasons for the
disproportionate impact of HIV among African
Americans
3Epidemiology of HIV/AIDS among Black People in
the US
4AIDS Data
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11HIV/AIDS Data
12(No Transcript)
137 times
20 times
14Gender distribution by Race/ethnicity new
HIV/AIDS Diagnoses in 2007
34
21
16
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17NHANES Survey
18Summary National Data for African Americans
- Make up 1 in 2 new cases but just 12 or 1 in 8
of the US population. - Males are more affected than females
- 2 out of every 3 new cases are male, 1 out of 3
is female - Greater racial disparities for females than
males. - MSM are the largest portion of male cases.
- Heterosexual risk is the largest portion of
female cases. - High prevalence in Northeast and Southeast
19Objectives
- To understand why sexual networks may place a key
role in the Af Am HIV epidemic - To understand key terms for aspects of sexual
networks - To understand how contextual factors might
influence the shape of Af Am sexual networks
20The Problem
- Black people experience higher HIV/AIDS rates
across gender, age, and behavioral risk groups.
21The Conundrum
- Not all of these disparities explained by
- higher risk behaviors
- lower individual income/educational levels
- key papers
- Millett et al. 2006 and 2007, Malebranche 2008,
Harawa, et al. 2004, Halfors, et al. 2007 - Although other minority groups experience
disparities, this is not true across the board or
across behavioral risk groups.
22Percentage of Persons Aged 22--44 Years at
Increased Risk for Human Immunodeficiency Virus
(HIV) Infection, by Race/Ethnicity and Education
--- National Survey of Family Growth, United
States, 2002
23Solving the Conundrum
- Looking beyond the individual level
- Couple
- Family
- Network social and sexual
- Neighborhood, zip, city, county, state, etc.
- Economic, STD prevalence, broken windows,
criminal justice, drug, political, . .
.environment
24Sexual Networks
- Groups of persons who are connected to one
another sexually. The number of persons in a
network, how central high-risk persons are within
it, the percentage in monogamous relationships
and the number of links each has to others all
determine how quickly HIV/STDs can spread through
a network. - Distinct from but often overlap with social
networks. - Who has sex with whom.
- How many and how tightly are members connected.
25Chlamydia network from Qikiqtarjuaq,
NunavutCanada, 2003
Data courtesy of Andrea Cuschieri
26Transmission Dynamics Model
R0 ß x c x D R0 Case reproduction
rate ß Efficiency of transmission C
Mean rate of partner change D Duration of
infectiousness Higher the value of R0, greater
spread of infection
Pamina M. Gorbach, DrPH Lecture UCLA 5/10/01
27Aspects of Sexual Networks
- Core groups
- Mixing patterns
- Concurrency
- Size
- Connectedness
- Rates of partner change
28Core Groups
- Critical to maintaining high transmission rates.
- Core transmitters have high levels of risky
behaviors, contribute a disproportionate share of
HIV/STDs cases, and can fuel sustained
transmission in a network. - Sex workers
- Repeatedly infected with STDs
- High numbers of sexual partners
- From core neighborhoods/networks
- Men who have sex with men
- IDUs (?crack users)
29Chlamydia network from Qikiqtarjuaq,
NunavutCanada, 2003
Data courtesy of Andrea Cuschieri
30Core Transmitters
31Chlamydia network from Qikiqtarjuaq,
NunavutCanada, 2003
Data courtesy of Andrea Cuschieri
32Partner Mixing Patterns
- Assortative
- Tendency toward partnering with similar partners
(e.g., ISO) - Similar race (especially Black women)
- Disassortative
- Tendency toward partnering with dissimilar
partners. - Dissimilar risk groups (partnering between high-
and low-risk partners). - Mixed
33Disassortative Mixing
- Random spread broadens transmission. An infection
spreads quickest when partnering is
random.(Laumann 1994) When partners select one
another within groups such as age, ethnicity,
class, religion or other characteristics,
diseases may not spread to all subgroups. When
partnering is anonymous or random, a disease can
spread more quickly through all groups.
34Examples of factors encouraging disassortative
mixing
- Gender norms
- Public sex venues
- Sex-ratio imbalances
- Secrecy/lack of dialogue regarding sexual
histories
35Concurrency
- Overlapping sexual partnerships
- Sexual partnerships in which a new sexual
partnership is initiated prior to the termination
of another. - Bacterial STDs are known to travel faster in
populations with greater concurrency, but with
equal rates of new partnerships.
36Concurrency
- Increases the probability for transmission,
because earlier partners can be infected by both
earlier and later partners. Further, they can
serve as nodes, connecting all persons in a
dense cluster, creating highly connected networks
that facilitate transmission. - Concurrent partners can connect each of their
respective clusters and networks as well. - Concurrency alone can fuel an epidemic even if
the average number of partners is relatively
low.(Morris, 1997)
37Centrality/Connectedness
- The degree to which an individual is near all
other individuals in a network (directly or
indirectly). - How central an HIV person is to a network deeply
influences transmission rates in a community. - In Colorado Springs, CO, network analysts found
that HIV persons had high levels of risk
behavior but were located in peripheral areas of
risk networks.(Rothenburg et al. 98). This
network configuration may have explained the
relatively low HIV transmission levels. - HIV persons in New York City, NY occupied
central positions within their needle-sharing and
sexual risk networks, which helped explain the
high observed levels of infection.(Friedman et
al. 97)
38Network Density
Two Examples 5 actors 10 possible ties
39Summary Sexual Networks
- Networks integrate core transmitters into the
larger population. - Dense networks help maintain STD endemicity.
- Core transmitters are key to population-based STD
control.
40Sexual network structure of African American
Communities
- Factors which influence these patterns
- Male-to-female sex ratios
- Social and residential segregation
- Incarceration
- Gender and cultural norms
- Racial oppression that diminishes opportunities
for advancement, especially for Black men
41CONTEXT-NETWORK PATHWAYS P O V E R T
Y/SEGREGATION Pool of
Relationship marriageable
men Instability CONCURRENCY SEX RATIO
42Male-to-female sex ratios
- Higher numbers of men than women across age
groups. - Caused by differential
- Mortality
- Incarceration
- Military service
- Compounded by differential
- Rates of interracial relationships
- Unemployment
43Current Marital Status
- Black women are less likely to marry, marry
later, and more frequently divorce than white
women.Tucker and Mitchell-Kernan, 1995. - Black women ages 15, are nearly half as likely
as white women to be married and living with
their spouse (29 vs. 54) Table A1. Marital
Status of People 15 Years and Over, by Age, Sex,
Personal Earnings, Race, and Hispanic Origin,
2003 - US Census
44Social and residential segregation
- Black people are the most racially segregated
group in the US. - Black/white segregation indices are still quite
high 69. - Blacks tend to be concentrated in metropolitan
areas (58). - Lower and middle-class African Ams more likely to
live in low-income urban areas than poor and
middle-class Whites.
45Incarceration of Black Men
- Nearly 5 of men are incarcerated at any given
time. - Among men ages 20-29 years, nearly 1 in 3 are
under criminal justice supervision. - Projection Nearly 1 in 3 men will be imprisoned
in lifetime. - Nearly 60 of low-income men who did not graduate
HS will be imprisoned.
46Dual Epidemics
47Impact of incarceration
- Imbalanced gender ratios
- Disrupted relationships - correctional
concurrency - Spread of STIs within prison
- Normalization of incarceration and effects on
normative community values of sex, violence and
drug use - Diversion of human/economic resources
N.T. Harawa and A. Adimora. Incarceration,
African Americans, and HIV advancing a research
agenda. J Natl Med Assoc 100 (2008) 57-62.
48Gender and cultural norms
- Economic/historical circumstances have altered
some gender norms but strengthened others. - Women historically have been employed.
- Women often play crucial decision-making roles
within institutions. - Masculine roles within families strongly
upheld/defended given threats/assaults in other
areas.
49Racial oppression
- Diminishes opportunities for economic
advancement, especially for Black men. - CONTEXT - NETWORK RELATIONSHIPS
- residential segregation by race
- concentration of adverse social and economic
influences (poverty, drugs, violence) - selection of partners
- from neighborhood
50Proximal/Distal Determinants
- A determinate is an element that identifies or
determines the nature of something or that fixes
or conditions an outcome - PROXIMAL DETERMINATES directly affect disease
risk. - DISTAL DETERMINANTS help shape behavior and the
risks associated with given behaviors.
51Determinants of Heightened STD Risks in African
American Communities
- MAJOR PROXIMAL DETERMINATES
- ??High prevalence of STDs
- ??Sexual network patterns concurrency and mixing
among different subpopulations - ??Risk behaviors
- DISTAL DETERMINANTS
- ??Poverty, inequality, discrimination,
segregation - ??Healthcare access and utilization
52NHANES Survey
53African American MSM
- Higher HIV rates despite
- Similar to lower risk behaviors
- Number partners
- Unprotected sex
- Risky drug use
- . . . Compared with other MSM
54Associations of Race/Ethnicity with HIV
Prevalence and HIV-related Behaviors among Young
MSM in Seven US Urban Centers
- Nina T. Harawa, MPH, PhD
- Los Angeles County
- HIV Epidemiology Program
55Hypothesis
- Young Black and Latino MSM are more likely to
report factors that are associated with high-risk
partners and behaviors. - These contribute to increased infection risk.
Risk level of Partner pool
Social and sexual networks
RACE
INFECTION RISK
56Objectives
- Use the Young Mens Survey (YMS) Phase One data
to - examine racial/ethnic differences in SES, risk
behaviors, and partnership types - examine associations of these factors with HIV
infection and - evaluate whether differences in these factors
explain racial/ethnic disparities in HIV - . . . among young MSM ages 15 22 years.
57Methods Sample Frame
- Study conducted in SF, LA, Seattle, Dallas, NYC,
Baltimore, and Miami - Venues identified via formative research
- Coffee house, clubs, events, parks, gyms, etc.
- Sampling frame constructed
- On-site enumeration (4-hr periods with yield 7
men ages 15-22 years) - Each month, 12 venues randomly selected
58Methods - Recruitment
- During sampling events
- Potentially eligible young men sequentially
selected and recruited - Consent obtained, survey administered, and HIV
CT performed in a mobile unit - Compensation 40-50
- Eligibility
- Ages 15-22 years
- Current resident
- Spoke Spanish or English
59Results - associations with race/ethnicity and age
60(No Transcript)
61Results - multivariate
- Following factors associated with infection
- Race/ethnicity
- Increasing age
- Lacking a parent who completed grad/professional
ed. - Being out of school/work
- Certain partner types (? with exchange, steady,
IDU partners) - Sharing needles
- Sex while high on crack (and poppers)
- Having any anal sex in past 6 months
62Results - multivariate associations with
race/ethnicity
63Discussion
- Reason for higher levels of infection among
blacks and Latinos still unclear - Findings provided little direct support for the
hypothesis
Risk level of Partner pool
Social and sexual networks
RACE
INFECTION RISK
64Other Key Issues
- Enhanced HIV testing a critical component
- 91 of HIV blacks unaware of infection in YMS
(ages 15-24 years) - Outness and homophobia may play key roles, but
not always in the expected directions. - A number of studies have shown higher levels of
risky behavior among out and gay-identified men
than other MSM
65Out to health provider by race/ethnicity and
known HIV status
Source L.A. Mens Survey 2008, National HIV
Behavioral Surveillance
66Potential alternative explanations for high HIV
rates in Black MSM
- Other indicators of partner type may better
indicate risk (e.g., age, race, SES, etc.) - Greater levels of concurrency
- Differential misreporting of risk behaviors
- Differences in frequency of anal sex
- Missed and delayed diagnosis of HIV infection
among MSM of color and their partners - Biological differences (e.g., CCR5 mutation and
circumcision prevalence)
67(No Transcript)