Title: FRICTION AND LUBRICATION REGIMES
1FRICTION AND LUBRICATION REGIMES
Socrates 2004
E. Ciulli Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica,
Nucleare e della Produzione University of
Pisa Pisa - Italy
Porto, Portugal, May 2004
2SUMMARY
- 1 STRIBECK AND LAMBDA CURVES
- 2 EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION
- 3 FLUID FILM RESULTS
- 3.1 Nonconformal contacts
- 3.2 Conformal contacts
- 3.3 Comparison with theory
- MIXED AND BOUNDARY RESULTS
- 4.1 Experimental nonconformal data
- 4.2 Wear and other problems
- 4.3 Theoretical observations
- CONCLUSIONS
31 STRIBECK AND LAMBDA CURVES
4General considerations
1 STRIBECK AND LAMBDA CURVES
- Friction related problems are very important for
engineering systems, in particular for a good
design as regards elements life and energy
savings. - Friction losses can be measured directly on real
machines, but a preliminary tribological
research, experimental and/or theoretical, can be
very useful for time and costs reduction. - One of the most required data for design is the
friction coefficient, also employed in simulation
programmes useful to reduce the number of
experimental tests. - Unfortunately it is not always easy to find a
realistic friction coefficient because there is a
large number of variables (such as lubricant,
velocity, load, geometry, roughness and
materials) influencing its value.
5Lubrication regimes
1 STRIBECK AND LAMBDA CURVES
- The evolution of the friction coefficient is
especially influenced by the parts of load
supported by the lubricant and by the surface
asperities of the solids, essentially depending
on load, speed and lubricant viscosity values. - Three different lubrication regimes, ranging from
fluid-film to boundary, are usually considered - fluid-film (or full fluid) lubrication
- mixed lubrication
- boundary lubrication
- Useful ways to represent the evolutions of the
friction coefficient f, evidencing the transition
between the different lubrication regimes, are
the so-called Stribeck curves and lambda (L)
curves.
6Stribeck curve
1 STRIBECK AND LAMBDA CURVES
boundary lubrication
mixed lubrication
full fluid lubrication
fs friction coefficient in boundary
lubrication (Coulomb) fh friction coefficient
for full lubricated conditions F total
load Fs part of the total load carried by
the asperity contacts Fh part of the total load
carried by the full lubricated zones T
total friction force
Sommerfeld number
7Influence of some parameters under mixed
lubrication
1 STRIBECK AND LAMBDA CURVES
8Altezza adimensionale del meato
1 STRIBECK AND LAMBDA CURVES
- Per avere bassi attrito e usura è importante che
la coppia funzioni in regime di lubrificazione
completa. Questo si verifica per unaltezza del
meato sufficientemente grande rispetto alla
rugosità superficiale. - Ai fini dellefficacia della lubrificazione è
pertanto più significativa unaltezza
adimensionale del meato, indicata spesso con L,
funzione dello spessore del meato h e delle
rugosità quadratiche medie delle superfici dei
corpi a contatto, Rq1 e Rq2.
Il valore di L per cui si ha il cambio di
regime dipende dal tipo di accoppiamento
lubrificato. Valori indicativi sono comunque Llt
0.1 1 lubrificazione limite 1 L 2 5
lubrificazione mista L gt 5
lubrificazione completa
Lgt3 L1
Meati con stessa altezza nominale h ma diverse
rugosità e relativi valori di L (indicativi)
9Inclusion of the effects of different surface
roughness L curve
1 STRIBECK AND LAMBDA CURVES
s(Rq12 Rq22)0.5
102 EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION
11Experimental rig
2 EXPERIMENTAL WORKS
specimens
12discs
2 EXPERIMENTAL WORKS
133 FLUID FILM RESULTS
143.1 Nonconformal contacts
15Test conditions non conformal contacts
3 FLUID FILM RESULTS - 3.1 Nonconformal
contacts
lubricant bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
(pure diester) temperature T 30C
(10C) viscosity h0 0.042 Pa s
(0.138 Pa s) pressure-viscosity coefficient a
1.8? 10-8 Pa-1 load F 20
N rolling speed u (us ud)/2
0.01, 0.0125, 0.02, 0.025, 0.03, 0.04,
0.05, 0.06, 0.075, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4,
0.6, 0.8, 1 m/s slide-to-roll ratio S
(us - ud)/u 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1
16Friction coefficient for a spherical specimen
against a glass disc for two lubricant
temperatures
3 FLUID FILM RESULTS - 3.1 Nonconformal
contacts
L1
L3
L1
L3
(spherical specimens S4, with diameter F41.275
mm and roughness Rq0.03 mm)
17Friction coefficient for a spherical specimen
against steel discs for two lubricant temperatures
3 FLUID FILM RESULTS - 3.1 Nonconformal
contacts
L1
L1
L3
(spherical specimens S4, with diameter F41.275
mm and roughness Rq0.03 mm)
18Friction coefficient for a cylindrical specimen
against a glass disc
3 FLUID FILM RESULTS - 3.1 Nonconformal
contacts
L1
L3
(cylindrical specimens C4, with diameter F42 mm
and roughness Rq0.14 mm)
19Line contacts
3 FLUID FILM RESULTS - 3.1 Nonconformal
contacts
20Different specimens same test conditions
3 FLUID FILM RESULTS - 3.1 Nonconformal
contacts
Surface roughness of the cylindrical specimens
21Lambda diagram
3 FLUID FILM RESULTS - 3.1 Nonconformal
contacts
223.2 Conformal contacts
23Test conditions conformal contacts
3 FLUID FILM RESULTS - 3.2 Conformal contacts
lubricant bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
(pure diester) temperature T
20C viscosity h0 0.075 Pa s load
F 10, 20, 30 N speed
Du 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 m/s
24Friction coefficient for a tilting pad tested
against a glass disc
3 FLUID FILM RESULTS - 3.2 Conformal contacts
253.3 Comparison with theory
26Nonconformal contacts friction coefficient
formulas
3 FLUID FILM RESULTS - 3.3 Comparison with
theory
- isothermal conditions
- Newtonian behaviour of the lubricant
- mean viscosity calculated introducing the mean
Hertzian contact pressure in the Barus formula - mean velocity gradient Du/hc (with DuSu sliding
speed and hc central film thickness) - Hertzian contact area as a reference surface
By introducing one of the most used formulas for
hc
For Eyring fluids (Jacod-Venner-Lugt formula)
ASME Journal of Tribology, 123 (2001)
27Nonconformal contacts experimental friction
coefficient compared with numerical results
(Newtonian and Eyring behaviour of the lubricant)
3 FLUID FILM RESULTS - 3.3 Comparison with
theory
28Conformal contacts friction coefficient for a
tilting pad against glass and steel discs
compared with numerical results
3 FLUID FILM RESULTS - 3.3 Comparison with
theory
294 MIXED AND BOUNDARY RESULTS
304.1 Experimental nonconformal data
31Friction coefficient for the spherical specimen
S4 against a steel disc at 30C
4 MIXED AND BOUNDARY RESULTS - 4.1
Experimental nonconformal data
L1
32Comparison of friction trends for different
specimens (S0.5)
4 MIXED AND BOUNDARY RESULTS - 4.1
Experimental nonconformal data
334.2 Wear and other problems
34Evolutions of friction coefficient for two
cylindrical specimens under mixed conditions in
presence of wear
4 MIXED AND BOUNDARY RESULTS - 4.2 Wear and
other problems
355 CONCLUSIONS
36Considerations on the friction trends
5 CONCLUSIONS
Differences between values of f measured for the
different S decrease by decreasing u at low
speeds (when boundary lubrication
approaches)
and by increasing u at high speeds (when thermal
effects for the highest values of S become more
significant)
f increases by increasing S
Specimen S4 against disc A8 (Stribeck-like
curves)
37Generalized lambda (L) diagram with lubrication
regimes
5 CONCLUSIONS
destructive wear
predominant turbulence effects
conformal
predominant thermal effects
nonconformal
38Final remarks
5 CONCLUSIONS
- The evolutions of the friction coefficient, in
particular for nonconformal contacts, can be very
different from the one of the typical Stribeck or
L diagram. Many variables such as shape and
dimension of the lubricated contact, roughness,
materials, characteristics of the lubricant and
thermal effects influence the friction trends.
- Many lubricated pairs of the most common machines
do not work under steady-state but under
transient conditions. Stationary results can be
extended to real conditions only with a certain
degree of approximation.
- Investigation under transient conditions show the
presence of a loop on the Stribeck diagram.
39Friction coefficient in variable speed conditions
5 CONCLUSIONS
cylindrical specimen
Â
spherical specimen
f (multiplied by 10) as a function of time for
specimen C4 (top) and S4 (bottom) for three
values of the slide-to-roll ratio S (S0.25, 0.5,
1, left to right). Test frequency 0.1 Hz. The
trend of the rolling speed is also shown on each
diagram.
40Summary of results under variable speed conditions
5 CONCLUSIONS
cylindrical specimen
spherical specimen
Filtered values of the friction coefficient f as
a function of the rolling speed u for three
values of the slide-to-roll ratio S and three
values of the test frequency (0.1, 0.5 and 1 Hz,
from left to right).
41(No Transcript)
42Formulas for Lambda ratio and minimum film
thickness
To limit the influence of the differences of
roughness that, even low, can play an important
role at the very low speeds, f can be plotted as
a function of the dimensionless film thickness L
instead of the speed u
h minimum film thickness, Rq root mean square
roughness
line contacts
point contacts
Umu/(ER), GaE , WF/(tER), WF/(E'R2), R
specimens radius m lubricant viscosity - u
rolling speed, (usud)/2 with ud and us surface
speeds of disc and specimen
E2(1-ns2)/Es(1-nd2)/Ed-1 compound elastic
modulus (E and n respectively Young and Poisson
moduli of the materials) - a pressure-viscosity
coefficient - F applied normal load - t axial
width of the cylindrical specimen
43Numerical data
44Main characteristics of some specimens
Suppliers
data
45Main characteristics of some discs
46Stribeck curves for specimen C3 for different
loads and temperatures
2 EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
47Rotational speed of specimen and disc for S0 and
S1
48Some references
- R. Bassani, E. Ciulli, B. Piccigallo,
"Theoretical and experimental results on friction
for line contacts in mixed and elastohydrodynamics
lubrication regimes", in Lubrication at the
frontier The role of the interface and surface
layers in the thin film and boundary regime,
Proceedings of the 25th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on
Tribology, Lyon, F, 8th-11th September 1998,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.215-222, 1999. - R. Bassani, E. Ciulli, "Friction in boundary and
mixed lubricated line contacts with different
roughness", in Thinning films and tribological
interfaces, Proceedings of the 26th Leeds-Lyon
Symposium on Tribology, Leeds, UK, 14th-17th
September 1999, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.759-768,
2000. - E. Ciulli, Friction in lubricated contacts
from macro- to microscale effects, in
Fundamentals of Tribology and Bridging the Gap
Between the Macro-and Micro/Nanoscales, NATO
Sciences Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht, The Netherlands, ISBN 0-7923-6837-1,
2001, pp. 725-734. - R. Bassani, E. Ciulli, "Experimental evaluation
of shape effects on friction in lubricated
nonconformal contacts", in Tribology research
from model experiment to industrial problem,
Proceedings of the 27th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on
Tribology, Lyon, France, 5th-8th September 2000,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.403-414, 2001. - R. Bassani, E. Ciulli, Friction from fluid-film
to boundary lubricated conditions, Invited paper
al 29th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, in
Tribological research and design for engineering
systems, Proceedings of the 29th Leeds-Lyon
Symposium on Tribology, Leeds, UK, 3-6 September
2002, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.821-834, 2003, ISBN
0-444-51243-8.