Comparison of Conventional, Roundup Ready, and Liberty-Link Cotton Weed Management Programs in Two Tillage Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Comparison of Conventional, Roundup Ready, and Liberty-Link Cotton Weed Management Programs in Two Tillage Systems

Description:

Comparison of Conventional, Roundup Ready, and Liberty-Link Cotton Weed ... Headland (Dothan sandy loam) Materials and Methods. Experimental Particulars ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:162
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: johnka89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparison of Conventional, Roundup Ready, and Liberty-Link Cotton Weed Management Programs in Two Tillage Systems


1
Comparison of Conventional, Roundup Ready, and
Liberty-Link Cotton Weed Management Programs in
Two Tillage Systems
Michael Patterson, Bob Goodman and Dale
Monks Auburn University Wilson Faircloth
USDA-ARS, Dawson Ga.
2
Alabama Cotton
  • In Alabama and most of the southeast, Roundup
    Ready Cotton comprises 90 to 95 of the acreage.
  • The remainder of cotton acreage is planted in
    conventional (non-transgenic) or Liberty-Link
    varieties.
  • Over 75 of Alabama cotton is grown in some form
    of reduced tillage.

3
Research Objectives
  1. Evaluate cotton production in tilled and reduced
    till systems using Roundup Ready, Liberty Link,
    and conventional weed management programs.
  2. Evaluate the economic viability of each
    tillage/weed management system.
  3. Philosophize on the implications of the data.

4
Materials and MethodsLocations
Tennessee Valley Research and Extension Center
Belle Mina (Decatur clay loam)
Wiregrass Research and Extension
Center Headland (Dothan sandy loam)
5
Materials and MethodsExperimental Particulars
  • Time frame 2005, 2006
  • Varieties FM 966, FM 960 RR, FM 966 LL
  • Conventional and reduced tillage.
  • Six Treatments
  • Replicated four times
  • Plot Dimensions both north and south AL four
    rows by 40 long, each plot separated by four
    border rows

6
Materials and MethodsExperimental Particulars
  • Tractor mounted sprayer used 15 GPA.
  • Conventional tillage north AL disk 2X,
    roterra. south AL subsoil, disk, roterra.
  • Reduced tillage north AL notill into wheat,
    south AL strip till into wheat.
  • Soil types north AL clay loam. south AL
    sandy loam

7
Tillage/Herbicide Treatments
8
Costs of Tillage/Weed Systems( per acre)
9
Effect of Herbicide System Fiber Strength and
Percent Lint (north Alabama)
Herbicide System Strength of Fiber g/tex Percent Lint 2006
RR variety 29.7 44.4
LL variety 31.7 43.1
CV variety 31.7 44.6
LSD (.05) 0.7 0.8
10
Effect of Tillage on Broadleaf Weed Control
(north Alabama)
Tillage System Control 2005 Control 2006
Reduced till 98 93
Conv till 98 84
LSD (.05) NS 5
11
Effect of Tillage on Cotton Yield and Economic
Return (south Alabama)
Tillage System Lint Lb/A /System
Reduced till 1576 700
Conv till 1425 625
LSD (.05) 105 ----
12
Effect of Herbicide System on Weed Control and
Cotton Yield (south Alabama)
Variable RR LL CV LSD .05
Grass 95 94 89 3
Brdlf 94 89 85 6
Lint /A 1564 1461 1326 125
Lint 41.6 39.4 40.8 0.9
/System 686 649 578 ----
13
SUMMARY (north Alabama)
  • No yield differences due to herbicide/tillage
    system in.
  • Decrease in late season broadleaf weed control
    for Conventional till in 2006.
  • Slight and inconsequential differences in
    strength and turnout between varieties.

14
Summary (south Alabama)
  • Greater yield in strip till than in conventional
    till in both years.
  • Greater yield in RR and LL systems than in
    conventional herbicide systems in both years.
  • Strip till returned 75.00 per acre more than
    conventional on average.
  • RR and LL returned 108.00 and 71.00 more per
    acre respectively than conventional herbicide
    system.

15
Implications of data
  • Probable reduction in economic return if south AL
    cotton growers return to conventional tillage and
    conventional herbicide technology.
  • New post-emergent herbicide technology with
    activity on pigweed is needed in light of the
    recent discovery of glyphosate and ALS resistant
    pigweed biotypes.

16
Support
  • Researchers gratefully acknowledge the financial
    assistance of Cotton Incorporated and Alabama
    cotton growers in conduction of this research.
  • Reseachers also gratefully acknowledge the
    support of Alabama Agricultural Experiment
    Station personnel at the Tennessee Valley and
    Wiregrass Research and Extension Centers.

17
Questions?
Q
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com