Title: Traditional Knowledge, Traditional Creativity and Cultural Expressions: What Role for IP
1Traditional Knowledge, Traditional Creativity
and Cultural Expressions What Role for IP?
- World Bank
- Distance Learning Course on Indigenous Knowledge
- March 31, 2005
Antony Taubman, Traditional Knowledge Division,
WIPO
2Overview
- What is the problem?
- protection vs. preservation
- Background to WIPOs activities
- Snapshot of the WIPO Intergovernmental Committee
- current issues and possible outcomes
3Overview
- What is the problem?
- protection vs. preservation
- Background to WIPOs activities
- Snapshot of the WIPO Intergovernmental Committee
- current issues and possible outcomes
4The Call for Protection the Deep Forest case
This is an illustrative example for educational
purposes only no views are expressed, and no
conclusions should be drawn, on any legal
question on the basis of this presentation
5Baegu Music Rorogwela Lullaby
sung by Afunakwa The rorogwela lullabies are
often sung not by the mother but by the childs
elder sister. The words refer to such a
situation the elder sister asks the baby not to
cry because its parents are dead and there is no
one else there to hear it.
6(No Transcript)
7The call for protection the deep forest case
- 1973 UNESCO recording Fateleka and Baegu Music
from Malaita - Baegu lullaby from Northern Malaita, Rorogwela
sung by Afunakwa - Some elements (substantial?) of (i) the melody
of the lullaby and (ii) the recording
(fixation) of the vocal performance used in
Sweet Lullaby by Deep Forest - Attributed to African cultures
- CD a huge commercial success, Sweet Lullaby
widely used in commercials - 1996, Norwegian saxophonist Jan Garbarek records
an adaptation of "Rorogwela, credited as "a
traditional African melody, arranged by Jan
Garbarek"
8The call for protection the deep forest case
- Immediate legal issues musical work,
performance, moral rights, economic rights - Broader issues preservation vs. protection
enforcement of legal rights recognition of
traditional works, communal ownership, customary
law - Policy choices what is needed here
- sui generis (stand alone) protection?
- adapted or extended use of existing intellectual
property system? - better, more equitable use of existing
intellectual property system?
9The call for protection the deep forest case
- Sui generis protection under existing treaties
- WIPO Performers and Phonograms Treaty protects
performances of expressions of folklore - Moral rights
- Economic rights even if recordings are not for
commercial gain - Berne Convention protects certain unpublished
works of unknown authorship - including traditional musical works
- fifty years after the work has been lawfully made
available to the public.
10Overview
- What is the problem?
- protection vs preservation
- Background to WIPOs activities
- Snapshot of the WIPO Intergovernmental Committee
- current issues and possible outcomes
11Overlapping areas of concern
- Definitions are needed to focus work, but need
not create firm boundaries - Cultural heritage - expressions of folklore or
traditional cultural expressions (TCEs) - Traditional knowledge (TK) - technical knowhow
- e.g. medical knowledge - Genetic resources
12Overlapping areas of activity
- Folklore - TCEs
- UNESCO (intangible cultural heritage)
- WIPO (folklore, Berne Convention, WPPT)
- WTO (folklore and TRIPS)
- ITC (capacity building on crafts)
- Traditional knowledge
- CBD (Article 8(j), 10(c), 17.2)
- FAO (Farmers rights)
- UNCTAD (TK in trade and development)
- WHO (Traditional medical knowledge)
- WTO (TRIPS)
- WIPO (TK and patent issues PCT, IPC)
13Overlapping areas of activity
- Genetic resources
- CBD conservation, sustainable use, equitable
benefit-sharing - FAO International Treaty on Plant Genetic
Resources for Food and Agriculture - WTO (TRIPS)
- WIPO (IGC)
- Indigenous rights
- ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention,
1989 (No. 169) - Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
(OHCHR)Working Group on Indigenous Populations
(WGIP) Draft Declaration on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples.
14Background to WIPOs work
- International cooperation on folklore since 1970s
- Berne Convention protection of folklore
- Article 15.4 In the case of certain unpublished
works of unknown authorship - (a) In the case of unpublished works where the
identity of the author is unknown, but where
there is every ground to presume that he is a
national of a country of the Union, it shall be a
matter for legislation in that country to
designate the competent authority which shall
represent the author and shall be entitled to
protect and enforce his rights in the countries
of the Union. - (b) Countries of the Union which make such
designation under the terms of this provision
shall notify the Director General by means of a
written declaration giving full information
concerning the authority thus designated. The
Director General shall at once communicate this
declaration to all other countries of the Union.
15Background to WIPOs work
- International cooperation on folklore since 1970s
- Berne Convention protection of folklore
- UNESCO-WIPO work in early 1980s
- UNESCO-WIPO Model Provisions for National Laws on
the Protection of Expressions of Folklore Against
Illicit Exploitation Other Prejudicial Actions - Expressions of folklore developed and maintained
in country shall be protected by this law
against illicit exploitation and other
prejudicial actions as defined in this law. - "expressions of folklore" productions consisting
of characteristic elements of the traditional
artistic heritage developed and maintained by a
community of country or by individuals
reflecting the traditional artistic expectations
of such a community ...
16Background to WIPOs work
- International cooperation on folklore since 1970s
- Berne Convention protection of folklore
- UNESCO-WIPO work in early 1980s
- UNESCO-WIPO Model Provisions
- 1985 treaty premature
- 1996 WIPO Performances Phonograms Treaty
- protection of expressions of folklore
- performers include those who perform
expressions of folklore - rights include moral rights, rights of fixation,
rights over communication and dissemination,
economic rights - even if recording was not made for commercial gain
17Background to WIPOs work
- International cooperation on folklore since 1970s
- Berne Convention protection of folklore
- UNESCO-WIPO work in early 1980s
- UNESCO-WIPO Model Provisions
- 1985 treaty premature
- 1996 WIPO Performances Phonograms Treaty
- protection of expressions of folklore
- 1997 Phuket plan of action
- 1998-99 Fact-finding missions on TK
- 2001- Intergovernmental Committee on GR, TK, F
18Overview
- What is the problem?
- protection vs preservation
- Background to WIPOs activities
- Snapshot of the WIPO Intergovernmental Committee
(IGC) - current issues and possible outcomes
19Traditional Values and IP at Odds?
- What does WIPO have to do with traditional
knowledge and cultural expressions? - Disquiet on the part of proponents and opponents
of the received IP system concerns raised about - imposing an IP straitjacket on traditional
cultures, overriding collective values of
indigenous and other traditional communities - IP concerns mainstream technology
commercialises commodifies knowledge culture
facilitates misappropriation of TK and cultural
expressions - IP rights are atomistic, private, individual - at
odds with values of traditional communities - IP concerns creativity and innovation, not
tradition -
20Where did the IGC come from, where is it going?
- From 1998-99, WIPO visited some 60 locations for
dialogue with around 3,000 representatives of TK
holder communities - idea was to base the new program on direct
learning of the needs expectations of TK
holders themselves - these insights still central to WIPOs work
- IGC established in 2001 - building on practical
experience worldwide - clarifies that this is an existing area of IP law
and practice many laws and practical cases
worldwide, within and beyond the conventional IP
system - but what is the international dimension?
21Towards resolution back to basics
- The IP system criticized for misappropriating
TK/TCEs, neglecting the interests of Indigenous
local communities. - But these very concerns often expressed in terms
that echo core principles of the IP system - promoting equity and balance,
- reconciling private and collective interests,
- recognizing distinctive origins and the
legitimate source of innovation and creativity, - suppressing free-riding and unjust enrichment,
- defending distinctive reputations from
illegitimate exploitation, - providing for rights of attribution and integrity
- This observation is the essence of an emerging
consensus
22What kind of challenge to the IP system?
- Indigenous and local communities continue to
innovate and create within their traditions - seek recognition for their past continuing
contribution to humanitys cultural
intellectual heritage - and appropriate respect for customary laws
- IGC a process of reviewing the core principles of
IP law, assessing how to apply those principles
for equitable protection of TK and TCEs - analysing validity, equity, effectiveness of IP
system from the distinct vantage point of
indigenous and local communities - Responding to critical concerns about the
relevance and legitimacy of IP system, the IGC
has seen deep reflection on the nature of IP, its
objectives, its assumptions, its limitations and
its boundaries.
23Some key substantive issues
- misappropriation - what is it to misappropriate
TK/TCEs, what is the cause of action and the
nature of the damage? - retroactivity - is the existing public domain
legitimate inviolable? - localisation - how to recognize and defer to a
communitys customary law? - collectivity - what legal status or legal
personality for traditional communities? - ownership - what is the nature of custodianship?
Who benefits? - subject matter - what makes knowledge and
cultural expressions traditional ?
24Some key process issues
- coordination - already an active area of national
and regional legislation - what is the
international layer? - interface with IP law - what is the sui generis
element of protection of TK and TCEs? - interface with other law - access regimes for
genetic resources, cultural policy, etc. what
is the (adapted, expanded or sui generis) IP
element?
25New IGC mandate for 2004-05
- continue work on questions included in previous
mandate - new work to focus on consideration of
international dimension, without prejudice to
work in other fora, - no outcome is excluded, including possible
development of an international instrument(s) - the ICG urged to accelerate its work and to
present a progress report - International Bureau to continue to assist by
providing necessary expertise and documentation.
26Folklore/Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs)
- IGC agrees in March 2004 to focus and accelerate
substantive work on TCEs, including preparing - an overview of policy objectives and core
principles for protection of TCEs (draft
provisions) - document WIPO/GRTKF/IC/7/3
- If Member States so choose, this could form the
basis of a new international instrument to
protect TCEs - the draft provisions could provide the substance
or content of an international instrument - political decision remains as to what legal
status and future process is needed to carry this
forward
27Traditional Knowledge (TK)
- IGC agrees in March 2004 to focus and accelerate
substantive work on TK, including preparing - an overview of policy objectives and core
principles for protection of TK (draft
provisions) - document WIPO/GRTKF/IC/7/5
- If Member States so choose, this could form the
basis of a new international instrument to
protect TK - the draft provisions could provide the substance
or content of an international instrument - political decision remains as to what legal
status and future process is needed to carry this
forward
28(No Transcript)
29What principles for TCEs/folklore?
- Responsiveness to aspirations and expectations of
relevant communities - Balance and proportionality
- Respect for and cooperation with other
international and regional instruments and
processes - Flexibility and comprehensiveness
- Recognition of the specific nature,
characteristics and traditional forms of cultural
expression - Respect for customary use and transmission of
TCEs/EoF - Effectiveness and accessibility of protection
30Specific substantive principles for TCEs/folklore
- Term of protection
- Formalities
- Sanctions, remedies and enforcement
- Application in time
- Relationship with intellectual property
protection - International and regional protection
- Scope of subject matter
- Criteria for protection
- Beneficiaries
- Management of rights
- Scope of protection
- Exceptions and limitations
31What forms of protection?
- culturally significant/sacred TCEs/EOF
- prevent reproduction, adaptation, public
communication and other such forms of
exploitation of any distortion, mutilation or
other modification of, or other derogatory action
in relation to and the acquisition by third
parties of IP rights - secret TCEs/EoF
- prevent unauthorized disclosure and subsequent
use of and acquisition by third parties of IP
rights - performances of TCEs/EoF
- protect moral and economic rights as per WPPT
- other TCEs/EoF
- identify source prevent offensive use, prevent
misleading indications, and equitable
remuneration
32What forms of protection?
- culturally significant/sacred TCEs/EOF
- prevent reproduction, adaptation, public
communication and other such forms of
exploitation of any distortion, mutilation or
other modification of, or other derogatory action
in relation to and the acquisition by third
parties of IP rights - secret TCEs/EoF
- prevent unauthorized disclosure and subsequent
use of and acquisition by third parties of IP
rights - performances of TCEs/EoF
- protect moral and economic rights as per WPPT
- other TCEs/EoF
- identify source prevent offensive use, prevent
misleading indications, and equitable
remuneration
33What forms of protection?
- culturally significant/sacred TCEs/EOF
- prevent reproduction, adaptation, public
communication and other such forms of
exploitation of any distortion, mutilation or
other modification of, or other derogatory action
in relation to and the acquisition by third
parties of IP rights - secret TCEs/EoF
- prevent unauthorized disclosure and subsequent
use of and acquisition by third parties of IP
rights - performances of TCEs/EoF
- protect moral and economic rights as per WPPT
- other TCEs/EoF
- identify source prevent offensive use, prevent
misleading indications, and equitable
remuneration
34What forms of protection?
- culturally significant/sacred TCEs/EOF
- prevent reproduction, adaptation, public
communication and other such forms of
exploitation of any distortion, mutilation or
other modification of, or other derogatory action
in relation to and the acquisition by third
parties of IP rights - secret TCEs/EoF
- prevent unauthorized disclosure and subsequent
use of and acquisition by third parties of IP
rights - performances of TCEs/EoF
- protect moral and economic rights as per WPPT
- other TCEs/EoF
- identify source prevent offensive use, prevent
misleading indications, and equitable
remuneration
35What objectives for protection of TK?
- Recognise value
- Promote respect
- Meet the actual needs of holders of traditional
knowledge - Empower holders of TK
- Support traditional knowledge systems
- Contribute to safeguarding traditional knowledge
- Repress unfair and inequitable uses
- Concord with relevant international agreements
and processes
- Promote innovation and creativity
- Promote intellectual and technological exchange
- Promote equitable benefit sharing
- Promote community development and legitimate
trading activities - Preclude the grant of invalid IP rights
- Enhance transparency and mutual confidence
- Complement protection of traditional cultural
expressions
36What guiding principles for TK protection?
- Responsiveness to the needs and expectations of
TK holders - Recognition of rights
- Effectiveness and accessibility
- Flexibility comprehensiveness
- Equity and benefit-sharing
- Consistency with existing legal systems
- Respect for and cooperation with other
international and regional instruments and
processes - Respect for customary use and transmission of TK
- Recognition of the specific characteristics of TK
37What substantive principles for TK protection?
- Protection against misappropriation-
suppression of misappropriation- general nature
of misappropriation- acts of misappropriation-
unfair competition - Recognition of the customary context
- Legal form of protection
- General scope of subject matter
- Eligibility for protection
- Beneficiaries of protection
- Equitable compensation and recognition of
knowledge holders
- Prior informed consent
- Exceptions and limitations
- Duration of protection
- Application in time
- Administration and enforcement of protection
- International and Regional Protection
38What form of protection?
39(No Transcript)
40(No Transcript)
41(No Transcript)
42Next steps
- Comment period on draft provisions for TK and TCE
protection - Revised draft provisions to be circulated approx.
end March - Further informal consultations in April - May
- IGC meets on June 6 to 10 to consider
- substance of provisions
- how to take the substance forward?
- what recommendations to the General Assembly?
43policy objectives core principles
options for recognizing TK/TCE protection in
foreign jurisdictions
An emerging framework
elements of folklore/ TCE protection at the
national level
measures on IP genetic resources
elements of TK protection at the national level
Link to detailed capacity building materials
44Genetic Resources and Intellectual Property
45Overview
- Linking equitable benefit-sharing from genetic
resources and the patent system - Issues and processes in WIPO fora
- Some working materials
- Cooperation with the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD) - Some substantive questions
46Overview
- Linking equitable benefit-sharing from genetic
resources and the patent system - Issues and processes in WIPO fora
- Some working materials
- Cooperation with the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD) - Some substantive questions
47Access equitable benefit-sharing what links
to the patent system?
- Access and benefit-sharing in line with
objectives of CBD and FAO International Treaty - e.g. CBD objectives (i) conservation of
biological diversity (ii) sustainable use of its
components (iii) fair and equitable sharing of
the benefits arising out of the utilization of
genetic resources - Patent system - in particular treatment of
inventions that arise out of the utilization of
genetic resources (and associated TK)
48Access equitable benefit-sharing what links
to the patent system?
- Two essential scenarios put forward
- Direct patenting of source material
- a patent (or application) directly claims as an
invention genetic resources (or associated
traditional knowledge) obtained from a separate
source - Patenting inventions derived from source material
- a patent (or application) claims an invention
that is somehow derived from or somehow uses
genetic resources or TK - this link expressed in
several ways - Has the GR/TK been legitimately accessed?
- Is the patent consistent with equitable
benefit-sharing?
49Access equitable benefit-sharing what links
to the patent system?
- Opens up some fundamental questions
- Legal what obligations arise (or should arise)
from the circumstances of access and the nature
of use of genetic resources (and associated TK)? - How does (or should) this affect
- the entitlement to apply for and be granted a
patent (should the applicant receive a patent?) - the patentability of the invention as such (does
the invention - other interests and entitlements (e.g. equitable
or ownership interests, expectation to benefit) - other obligations (e.g. obligation to report on
patenting activity, obligation to disclose)
50Access equitable benefit-sharing what links
to the patent system?
- Disclosure requirements
- various existing mechanisms, national/regional
legislative initiatives,and international
proposals - create or confirm a legal linkage betweenGR or
TK used and the claimed invention - beyond disclosure per se (provision of
information), have variously been linked to - patentability of invention as such
- entitlement to apply or be granted a patent
- capacity to enforce a patent
51Access equitable benefit-sharing what links
to the patent system?
- Supplementing basic legal issues, some practical
questions - E.g. what kinds of practical arrangements would
- reduce the likelihood of illegitimate patents
being granted that claim GR/TK directly, or
non-inventive derivatives of GR/TK - continuing work on various defensive protection
and enhanced search and examination measures - facilitate equitable sharing of benefits from
legitimate patenting of derivative inventions
(what kinds of agreements and partnerships
promote monetary and non-monetary benefit sharing
- Bonn Guidelines) - information and capacity building work (database
of benefit sharing agreements, practical guide to
supplement general ABS capacity-building
projects) - UNEP-WIPO study on IP aspects of access and
benefit-sharing
52Overview
- Linking equitable benefit-sharing from genetic
resources and the patent system - Issues and processes in WIPO fora
- Some working materials
- Cooperation with the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD) - Some substantive questions
53WIPO fora and GR/patent issues
- Intergovernmental Committee on IP and Genetic
Resources, TK Folklore - considers legal issues (technical study)
- oversees capacity-building initiatives
- Standing Committee on Patent Law
- proposed text for Article 2 of draft Substantive
Patent Law Treaty - reference to issue of disclosure at last meeting
- Working Group on PCT Reform
- Swiss proposal for amendment of PCT Regulations
to allow for disclosure mechanisms
54Overview
- Linking equitable benefit-sharing from genetic
resources and the patent system - Issues and processes in WIPO fora
- Some working materials
- Cooperation with the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD) - Some substantive questions
55(No Transcript)
56Technical study on disclosure mechanisms
- Prepared initially under the supervision of the
IGC, responding to invitation from Sixth CBD
Conference of Parties - based on questionnaire responses from WIPO Member
States - successive drafts considered by IGC
- transmitted to CBD COP VII by the WIPO General
Assembly - triggers request for follow-up work from CBD COP,
and proposed further feedback from CBD to WIPO
57Technical study
- ...to contribute to international discussion and
analysis of this general issue, and to help
clarify some of the legal and policy matters it
raises... - ...technical input to facilitate policy
discussion and analysis in the CBD and in other
fora, and it should not be considered a formal
paper expressing a policy position on the part of
WIPO, its Secretariat or its Member States... - ...explored issues relevant to the interaction
between the patent system and GR/TK used in an
invention... not sought to resolve these issues
but rather to illustrate and elucidate them.
may wish to consider future work in this area
including additional exchange of national
experience, and the elaboration of case studies
and the analysis of some of the specific
disclosure scenarios described and discussed in
the draft study
58Technical study
- ...to contribute to international discussion and
analysis of this general issue, and to help
clarify some of the legal and policy matters it
raises... - ...technical input to facilitate policy
discussion and analysis in the CBD and in other
fora, and it should not be considered a formal
paper expressing a policy position on the part of
WIPO, its Secretariat or its Member States... - ...explored issues relevant to the interaction
between the patent system and GR/TK used in an
invention... not sought to resolve these issues
but rather to illustrate and elucidate them.
may wish to consider future work in this area
including additional exchange of national
experience, and the elaboration of case studies
and the analysis of some of the specific
disclosure scenarios described and discussed in
the draft study
59Technical study
- ...to contribute to international discussion and
analysis of this general issue, and to help
clarify some of the legal and policy matters it
raises... - ...technical input to facilitate policy
discussion and analysis in the CBD and in other
fora, and it should not be considered a formal
paper expressing a policy position on the part of
WIPO, its Secretariat or its Member States... - ...explored issues relevant to the interaction
between the patent system and GR/TK used in an
invention... not sought to resolve these issues
but rather to illustrate and elucidate them.
may wish to consider future work in this area
including additional exchange of national
experience, and the elaboration of case studies
and the analysis of some of the specific
disclosure scenarios described and discussed in
the draft study
60- Analyses options under five aspects (Section VI)
- relationship between the claimed invention and
the GR/TK or what would be a sufficient link
between the two to trigger a disclosure
requirement - legal principle forming basis of requirement
- nature of the obligation placed on the applicant
- consequences of failure to comply with the
requirement - how the requirement would be implemented,
verified or monitored - Sets out specific methods for disclosure (Section
VIII)
61- Possible disclosure scenarios (191-199)
- TK as relevant prior art
- TK holder as inventor
- Disclosure of origin of genetic
resources(enablement and best mode) - Disclosure of the actual genetic resources
- Evidence of entitlement to apply
- Registration of equitable/ownership interests
- Disclosure of information in compliance with
other legal obligations (e.g. access regimes) - Specific GR/TK disclosure mechanisms
- various specific mechanisms, various legal bases
for requirements
62(No Transcript)
63UNEP-WIPO study on ABS and IP
- Pre-launch version submitted to Ministerial
Conference, CBD COP VII - Joint UNEP-WIPO launch imminent
- (inspection copies available today)
- Professor AK Gupta (Honey Bee Network)
- explores three case studies of the role of
patents in access and benefit sharing - independent analysis of the practical and legal
issues that arise, limitations of current
approaches
64Overview
- Linking equitable benefit-sharing from genetic
resources and the patent system - Issues and processes in WIPO fora
- Some working materials
- Cooperation with the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD) - Some substantive questions
65CBD invitation to WIPO
- Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
Conference of Parties (COP) VI - Decision VII/19 - interrelation of access to
genetic resources and disclosure requirements in
IP rights applications
66- Invitation to WIPO to...
- examine, and where appropriate address, taking
into account the need to ensure that this work is
supportive of and does not run counter to the
objectives of the CBD, issues regarding the
interrelation of access to genetic resources and
disclosure requirements in IP rights
applications, including, inter alia
67- Invitation to WIPO to...
- examine, and where appropriate address, taking
into account the need to ensure that this work is
supportive of and does not run counter to the
objectives of the CBD, issues regarding the
interrelation of access to genetic resources and
disclosure requirements in IP rights
applications, including, inter alia - Options for model provisions on proposed
disclosure requirements - Practical options for IP rights application
procedures with regard to the triggers of
disclosure requirements - Options for incentive measures for applicants
- Identification of the implications for
functioning of disclosure requirements in various
WIPO-administered treaties - IP-related issues raised by proposed
international certificate of origin/source/legal
provenance
68Possible Reporting Procedure
- and regularly provide reports to the CBD on
its work, in particular on actions or steps
proposed to address the above issues, in order
for the CBD to provide additional information to
WIPO for its consideration in the spirit of
mutual supportiveness
69Possible future work proposed to IGC
- in the light of developments to consider
possible future work for the Committee on this
issue, including the proposals in para 12(ii) of
WIPO/GRTKF/IC/5/10 - including the continued exchange of national
experience and case studies, and the development
of guidelines and recommendations concerning the
interaction between access to genetic resources
and patent disclosure.
70Overview
- Linking equitable benefit-sharing from genetic
resources and the patent system - Issues and processes in WIPO fora
- Some working materials
- Cooperation with the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD) - Some substantive questions
71Some substantive questions
- Legal and policy issues concerning
- eligibility of inventions per se for protection
- eligibility of applicants to gain patents
- ownership, inventorship and equitable interests
- capacity to exploit and benefit from patents
- interplay between obligations incurred in one
jurisdiction arising from access to genetic
resources, and the operation of the patent system
in another jurisdiction - Incentives to use patent system to promote ABS
- Sanctions for failure to comply with ABS
regulations
72The various avenues proposed
- CBD invitation
- model provisions
- practical options for triggers of disclosure
requirements - options for incentive measures for applicants
- implications for various WIPO-administered
treaties - IP-related issues from proposed international
certificate - PCT system Swiss proposal to enable disclosure
requirements - Standing Committee on Patent Law reference to
genetic resources in draft, disclosure issue
raised - Intergovernmental Committee proposed guidelines
and recommendations, policy and legal development