Continuous Improvement Performance Plan CIPP Carteret County Data Story

1
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan
(CIPP)Carteret County Data Story

• Debbie Sewell
• (date)

2
Indicator 1Graduation
Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high
school with a regular diploma.
State Target 50
61.70

• 61.83

3
Indicator 2Drop Out
Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out of high
school.
State Target 7

• (insert LEA 05-06 data)

Data not available
4
Indicator 3Assessment

• Participation and performance of children with
• disabilities on statewide assessment.
• State Target 25 of LEAs meeting AYP
• Carteret County did not meet AYP

5
Indicator 3Assessment Participation/Reading
State Target
Carteret Co. 05-06 data
Carteret Co. 06-07 data
6
Indicator 3Assessment Participation/Math
State Target
Carteret Co. 05-06 data
Carteret Co. 06-07 data
7
Indicator 3Assessment Performance/Reading
State Target
Carteret Co. 05-06 data
Carteret Co. 06-07 data
8
Indicator 3Assessment Performance/Math
State Target
Carteret Co. 05-06 data
Carteret Co. 06-07 data
9
Indicator 4Suspension/Expulsion

• Rates of suspension and expulsion of
• students with disabilities greater than 10
• days in a school year that is twice the
• state average or greater.
• State Target 9.1 of LEAs
• No LEA Data

10
Indicator 5Least Restrictive Environment

• Percent of children with IEPs aged 6
• through 21 served in regular, separate,
• or public, private, home or hospital
• settings.

11
Indicator 5Least Restrictive Environment
State Target
Carteret Co. 05-06 data
Carteret Co. 06-07 data
12
Indicator 7Preschool Outcomes

• Percent of preschool children with IEPs
• who demonstrate improvement in positive
• social-emotional skills, acquisition and
• use of knowledge and skills, and use of
• appropriate behaviors to meet their
• needs.
• State establishing baseline
• No LEA Data

13
Indicator 8Parent Involvement

• Percent of parents with a school age child
• receiving special education services who
• report that schools facilitated parent
• involvement as a means of improving
• service and results for children with
• disabilities.
• State establishing baseline.
• No LEA Data

14
Indicator 9Disproportionality Spec Ed

• Percent of districts with disproportionate
• representation of racial and ethnic groups
• in special education and related services
• that is the result of inappropriate
• identification.
• State Target 0
• State data indicated no LEA has significant
• disproportionate representation across all
• disability categories combined.

15
Indicator 10Disproportionality by Category

• Percent of districts with disproportionate
• representation of racial and ethnic groups
• in specific disability categories that is the
• result of inappropriate identification.
• State target 0
• In Carteret County, there is no disproportionate
  representation of racial and ethnic groups in
  specific disability categories that is the result
  of inappropriate identification.

16
Indicator 1190 Day Timeline

• Percent of children referred for whom a
• referral was received and placement
• determined within 90 days.

State Target 100
85 (05-06)
97.76 (06-07)
17
Indicator 12Part C to Part B

• Percent of children referred by Part C
• prior to age 3 and who are found eligible
• for Part B who receive special education
• and related services by their third
• birthday.

State Target 100
90.0 (06-07)
46.67 (05-06)
18
Indicator 13IEPs and Postsecondary Goals

• Percent of youth aged 16 and above with
• an IEP that includes coordinated,
• measurable, annual IEP goals and
• transition services that will reasonably
• enable the child to meet the
• postsecondary goals.

19
Indicator 13IEPs and Postsecondary Goals
State Target 100

• 95.7 (05-06)

71.0 (06-07)
20
Indicator 14Post-School Outcomes

• Percent of youth who had IEPs, are no
• longer in secondary school and who have
• been competitively employed, enrolled in
• some type of postsecondary school, or,
• both, within one year of leaving high
• school.
• State Baseline Data 75

Carteret County was not sampled for this school
year.
21
Indicator 15General Supervision Part 1

• Percent of noncompliance identified in the
• 2005-2006 school year corrected within
• one year.

State Target 100
Carteret County 100
22
Indicator 15General Supervision Part 2

• Percent of compliance rate of Internal
• Record Review.
• State Target 100

Carteret County 89
23
Questions?