Current Issues in Biomedical Informatics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 120
About This Presentation
Title:

Current Issues in Biomedical Informatics

Description:

Current Issues in Biomedical Informatics – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 121
Provided by: cours7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Current Issues in Biomedical Informatics


1
MBL / NLM Biomedical Informatics Course
  • Current Issues in Bio-medical
    Informatics
  • September 24, 2009 Donald A. B. Lindberg, MD

2
Current Issues
  • Electronic health records
  • Prospective population studies
  • Truth and transparency in clinical trials
  • Interactive publications
  • NLMs International activities
  • Disaster management information

3
Electronic Health Records
4
Proposed Solution
  • Electronic health records for all, and a full
    copy for the patient

5
(No Transcript)
6
2
7
Reasons to Register Clinical Trials and Report
Results
  • Ethical Considerations
  • Provide information to potential participants
  • Assists ethical review boards and others to
    assess risks and benefits of studies being
    reviewed
  • Promote fulfillment of ethical responsibility to
    human volunteers research contributes to
    medical knowledge
  • Scientific Considerations
  • Mitigates publication and outcome reporting
    biases
  • Search engine enables users to conduct a fielded
    search to identify relevant studies, whether or
    not results have been published in a journal
  • Improves transparency in the design, conduct and
    analysis of clinical trials
  • Promotes more efficient allocation of research
    resources

8
New Registrations Continue to Increase
4
4
9
ClinicalTrials.gov Statistics (as of 08/10/09)
  • Number Percent
  • Total 77,096 100
  • Type of Trial
  • Observational 12,634
    16
  • Interventional 64,240
    83
  • Drug Biologic 47,156
  • Surgical Procedure 8,250
  • Behavioral, Gene
  • Transfer, Other
    12,446
  • Device 4,520
  • International Sites (169 countries)
  • US only 36,349 47
  • Non-US only 27,073 35
  • US Non-US 5,513 7
  • Missing 8,161 11

222 records missing Study Type information 222
device trials delayed posting
10
ClinicalTrials.gov Statistics (cont.)(as of
08/10/09)
Trials by Data Provider
Number Percent US Federal (including NIH)
19,006 25 Industry
24,127 31 University, Other
33,963 44 Total
77,096
User Statistics Page Views per month
40 Million Unique visitors per month
500,000
11
ClinicalTrials.gov Visitors by Role(N13,097)
Source American Customer Satisfaction Index
(ASCI) Online Consumer Survey Six-Month Period
in 2007
12
(No Transcript)
13
Why the legislation?
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Trans-Australia Journal of Orthopedics
18
Info Required to be Provided for NLM Records re
Clinical Trials
  • Registration of existence and design of trial
  • Results of trial within one year
  • No individual patient data
  • No recommendations

19
Demographic Baseline
  • A table of the demographic and baseline data
    collected overall and for each arm of the
    clinical trial
  • Sec. 282(j)(3)(C)(i)

20
Default Required Measures
User-Specified Measure
Categories
21
Participant Flow
  • A table ..., including the number of patients
    who dropped out of the clinical trial and the
    number of patients excluded from the analysis, if
    any.
  • Sec. 282(j)(3)(C)(i)

22
Arms
Milestone
Reasons Not Completed
23
Outcome Measures
  • a table of values for each of the primary and
    secondary outcome measures for each arm of the
    clinical trial
  • Sec. 282(j)(3)(C)(ii)

24
Categories
25
Statistical Analysis
  • a table of values for each of the primary and
    secondary outcome measures, including the
    results of scientifically appropriate tests of
    the statistical significance of such outcome
    measures.
  • Sec. 282(j)(3)(C)(ii)

26
Statistical Analysis
27
Certain Agreements
  • Whether there exists an agreement (other than an
    agreement solely to comply with applicable
    provisions of law protecting the privacy of
    participants) between the sponsor or its agent
    and the principal investigator (unless the
    sponsor is an employer of the principal
    investigator) that restricts in any manner the
    ability of the principal investigator, after the
    completion date of the trial, to discuss the
    results of the trial at a scientific meeting or
    any other public or private forum, or to publish
    in a scientific or academic journal information
    concerning the results of the trial.

Sec. 282(j)(3)(C)(iv)
28
Serious Adverse Events
  • A table of anticipated and unanticipated serious
    adverse events grouped by organ system, with
    number and frequency of such event in each arm of
    the clinical trial.
  • Sec. 282(j)(3)(I)(iii)(I)

29
Quality Assurance Challenges
  • Data tables will be the public representation of
    the studymust be clear and informative
  • NLM QA Focuses on
  • Apparent Validity (when possible)
  • Meaningful Entries
  • Internal consistency/logic
  • Format
  • Detailed Review of Results Submissionhttp//prsin
    fo.clinicaltrials.gov/DetailedReview.pdf

30
http//prsinfo.clinicaltrials.gov/fdaaa.html
39
31
ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database
  • Required by US law (FDAAA)
  • Summary results must be posted for certain
    clinical trials of drugs or devices
  • New frontier in disseminating results of clinical
    trials
  • No editorial/selection process
  • Tabular format requires that data speak for
    themselves
  • Structured database will permit very specific
    searches

32
Current Status Basic Results(as of 08/10/09)
  • Functional Web-based Data Entry System
  • Launched in September 2008
  • 1,310 Results records submitted
  • Industry 957 records from 150 data providers
  • Other 353 records from 225 data providers
  • Rate of submission continues to increase
  • 40 records per week now
  • Anticipate about 150 per week

33
Quality Assurance Challenges
  • Data tables will be the public representation of
    the studymust be clear and informative
  • Data must be entered by somebody familiar with
    the study design and data analysis
  • QA process designed to ensure that data could
    make sense to somebody not already familiar with
    the study

34
Quality Assurance Challenges
  • Data tables will be the public representation of
    the studymust be clear and informative
  • Data must be entered by somebody familiar with
    the study design and data analysis
  • QA process designed to ensure that data could
    make sense to somebody not already familiar with
    the study

35
Informative Entry
36
Problematic Entry
37
http//prsinfo.clinicaltrials.gov/fdaaa.html
38
Next Challenge Adverse Events
39
Then Another Even Bigger Challenge
  • Narrative summary of results
  • Understandable by scientists and the public

40
Narrative Summaries Concerns
  • Information about a single clinical trial is
    generally not relevant for the lay public (i.e.,
    should not influence clinical decision making)
  • Summary of an individual trial would include data
    without critical appraisal of methods, which
    violates basic principles of EBM, and could be
    misleading
  • Preferred approaches include links to systematic
    reviews and other authoritative assessments, as
    well as links to published articles

41
Interactive Publications
42
Interactive publications
  • Current publications with simulated interaction

43
elation of Intimal Hyperplasia Thickness to Stent
Size in Paclitaxel-Coated Stents
44
Influence of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on
Heart Rate Turbulence Parameters
45
After - Prevalence of Drug-Induced
Electrocardiographic Pattern of the Brugada
Syndrome in a Healthy Population
46
True Interactive publications
47
Laparoscopic Infracolic Necrosectomy Slide 1 PMID
14973724
48
Laproscopic Infracolic Necrosectomy Slide 2
49
49
50
Laparoscopic Ladds slide 2
51
(No Transcript)
52
NLM Study of Interactive Publications
  • 368 journal issues with 15,003 MEDLINE citations
  • 258 articles (2) included interactive content
    video, audio, animation, or table-building
  • PubMed Central already has 13,374 articles with
    supplementary data
  • No standardization of metadata yet

53
GOALS
  • To develop an interactive software and curated
    database infrastructure Interactive Science
    Publishing
  • To give authors the ability to submit their own
    databases and ISP-enabled figures in actual
    peer-reviewed journal articles
  • To give readers and editors the ability to view,
    analyze, and interact with source data published
    in conjunction with an article
  • To evaluate the educational value of ISP used
    within actual scholarly journal articles
  • To explore the problems of archiving this medium

54
Project Description
  • Publish special journal issues on biomedical
    research topics in OSA journals, especially
    Optics Express
  • PDF articles incorporate source data, videos, and
    other media objects which can be
  • Visualized using ISP interactive viewing software
  • Downloaded quickly and conveniently
  • Authors, reviewers and readers asked for feedback
    at every stage
  • Project includes a formal usability analysis and
    a user evaluation survey
  • Articles and datasets are open access and are
    fully citable and archived in OSAs InfoBase
    database
  • Databases including source data and metadata are
    searchable and accessible through a variety of
    search engines, not just OSAs
  • Reader software is free

55
Early Results
  • Software version 2.2 deployed
  • First issue, October 2008, 7 papers, 45
    datasets, Virtual Focus
  • Second issue, March 2009, 17 papers, 242
    datasets, Optical Coherence Tomography in
    Ophthalmology
  • Preliminary feedback from authors, editors and
    usability experts is positive

56
Next Steps
  • Issues 3 and 4 in process
  • Digital Holography, October 2009
  • Lung Cancer Imaging, January 2010
  • One year assessment now in progress
  • Monthly reports are generated through end of
    assessment period
  • Preliminary results are very encouraging

57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
NLM Info for the Public Interactive Too
60
(No Transcript)
61
(No Transcript)
62
(No Transcript)
63
(No Transcript)
64
(No Transcript)
65
(No Transcript)
66
(No Transcript)
67
(No Transcript)
68
(No Transcript)
69
(No Transcript)
70
(No Transcript)
71
NLMs International Activities
72
Who uses NLM on-line services?
73
2008 NLM Worldwide Page Views56.4 Million Page
Views Total
74
2008 MedlinePlus Worldwide Page Views754 Million
Page Views Total
75
MEDLINE Journals
76
Top 10 Countries with Titles in MEDLINE
  • 2009 2006
  • 1. United States 2177 2050
  • 2. England 1111 737
  • 3. Netherlands 287 229
  • 4. Germany 279 204
  • 5. Japan 161 141
  • 6. Switzerland 143 138
  • 7. France 105 96
  • 8. Italy 100 87
  • 9. China 91 60
  • 10. Canada 84 78

77
Countries with Journals in 2009 but None in 2002
  • Georgia
  • Indonesia
  • Iran
  • Lithuania
  • Macedonia
  • Malawi
  • Mali
  • Nepal
  • Philippines
  • Slovenia
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda
  • United Arab Emirates

78
MEDLINE Journal Titles By Continent
79
Electronic Full Text Access (8/14/2009)
About 80,000 NIH-funded articles are published
annually, 12 of articles indexed by NLM
80
MedlinePlus in Multiple Languages
  • Consumer health information
  • in over 40 languages
  • covers over 250 diseases, conditions, and
    procedures
  • Popular topics
  • Diabetes
  • High blood pressure
  • Tuberculosis
  • Breastfeeding
  • Pregnancy

81
MedlinePlus Multiple Languages Collection
  • Amharic (amarunya)
  • Arabic (??????? )
  • Armenian (???????)
  • ASL (American Sign Language)
  • Bengali (Bangla)
  • Bosnian (Bosanski)
  • Burmese (myanmasa)
  • Chamorro (chamoru)
  • Chinese - Simplified (????)
  • Chinese - Traditional (????)
  • Chuukese (Trukese)
  • Croatian (Hrvatski)
  • Farsi ( ????? )
  • French (français)
  • German (Deutsch)
  • Gujarathi (???????)
  • Haitian Creole (Kreyol)
  • Hindi (??????)
  • Hmong (Hmoob)

82
MedlinePlus Content
83
MedlinePlus Content
799 English 751 Spanish
1,000 monographs
173 tutorials
1,035 links
3500 articles gt2,000 images
42 topics
224 English 9 Spanish
15-20 stories added daily
Over 100 directories of doctors, hospitals,
clinics libraries
Weekly podcast
gt40 languages gt250 topics gt3,000 links
32 sites 44 of U.S. population
2 RSS feeds 13 daily weekly listservs
11 English issues 1 bilingual issue
84
NLM Outreach in Africa
African Malaria Researchers (Multilateral
Initiative on Malaria Communications Network)
NLM Medical Info
African Medical Journals (African Medical Journal
Partnership Project)
African Medical Students (Medline Plus Tutorial
on Malaria)
African Medical Librarians (NLM Associates
Program Network of African Medical Librarians
Deans)
85
(No Transcript)
86
Internet Access
  • 19 sites in 12 countries

87
First research network of its kind in Africa
88
(No Transcript)
89
Gabon
90
African Medical Journal Editors Partnership
Project
91
African Medical Journal Editors Partnership
Project
  • 6 African journals
  • 6 journals from US and UK
  • Objective
  • African journals get into Medline
  • Research carried out here available to
    international audience

92
(No Transcript)
93
Information Retrieval in Action in the Village
94
Malaria Tutorial
95
Tutorial History
  • Image creation by local artists in Uganda
  • Cultural considerations

96
Tutorial History
97
Tutorial Field Testing
  • As part of their curriculum, medical students
    take tutorials to the field for comments.

Medical student Ronnie Kiweewa
98
Disaster Management Information Research
  • Trans-NLM Project
  • Bethesda Group
  • Connections to National Efforts
  • Director, Dr Steve Phillips

99
pic of Steve Phillip
100
National Library of MedicineDisaster Information
Management Research Center
U.S. Government Portal to provide tools,
literature, research methods to assist with
disaster preparedness, response, and recovery
  • Steven J. Phillips, MD, Associate Director
  • Specialized Information Services, NLM
  • sphillip_at_mail.nih.gov

101
NLM Long History
KATRINA
1998
CYBER TERRORISM
102
NLM-supported Research Programs
automated bio-surveillance self-healing
wireless networks smart tags to track patients
during emergencies built the Influenza Virus
Resource with the NIAID OSIRIS a software
package to assist in identifying 9/11 victims
remains via DNA worked via NN/LM to
re-establish and maintain access to health
information in the Katrina-affected region
103
CENTER OBJECTIVES
  • Organize the disaster literature
  • Maintain library operations
  • Information tools
  • Scalable reproducible models
  • R D

104
Sources Users of Disaster Literature
105
  • Who will identify, organize, distribute this
  • varied, diverse, non-commercial literature?
  • Government reports
  • Homeland Security Presidential Directives
  • National Incidence Management Systems
  • National Response Plan Framework
  • Conference Proceedings
  • State publications
  • Red Cross
  • Commentaries
  • NGO publications
  • Official Reports
  • Non peer reviewed publications
  • Community resources
  • Training design technologies
  • Preparedness options
  • Response plans for different events
  • Sister Agency Publications
  • Catalogues

106
ANSWER THE DISASTER INFORMATION SPECALIST
107
Disaster Information Specialist
  • ASPR
  • NYU
  • USUHS
  • SMH
  • 160 on Listserv growing daily

Research ways to understand the settings
situations in users work, acquire, use
information
108
  • NLM Develops innovative products and services to
  • support emergency preparedness and response
    activities

TOXMAP
NLMREMM ASPR NCI CDC
PTSD/TBI screener
109
2004 Congressional Earmark
R D
22
110
.
  • Network back-up -laser and dark fiber
  • Army MARS radio communications back-up
  • Rx Hub/prescription access in disaster
  • RFID patient tracking
  • Digital triage forms data capture technologies
  • Virtual world disaster training
  • Lost person finder
  • Disaster Information Specialist

111
Virtual Environments for Training
Modeling and Simulation
  • Used in NLMs TOXTOWN
  • Virtual platform for drills and simulations
  • 3-D mapping of Bethesda area

112
Disaster Literature
Indexed for Pubmed
113
What is Go Local? What is the Difference with
MedlinePlus?
Example Breast Cancer
  • Health info MedlinePlus
  • Symptoms, treatment, coping
  • News
  • Tutorials
  • PubMed
  • ClinicalTrials.gov
  • Genetics Home Reference
  • Services Go Local
  • Health screening
  • Cancer care facilities
  • Support groups
  • Exercise, yoga classes
  • Providers of wigs and prostheses
  • Oncologists

114
Finding Go Local
115
Go Local In the Beginning
  • NC Health Info
  • 2000/01 feasibility study
  • 2002 system development and outreach
  • 2003 site released
  • 2004
  • NLM begins to develop a centralized system with
    controlled vocabulary
  • Request for proposals, 11 received and accepted
  • 2005
  • Beginning of more Go Local sites

116
MedlinePlus Go Local May 2005
117
Go Local Today
118
Go Local Tomorrow
119
Go Local Emergency Feature
120
END
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com