Title: Small Changes, Big Rewards: Integrating the Disparate Threads of Undergraduate Education to Create a
1Small Changes, Big Rewards Integrating the
Disparate Threads of Undergraduate Education to
Create a Learning-Centered InstitutionCarol
Burton, Assistant Vice Chancellor, Undergraduate
StudiesMelissa Canady Wargo, Director,
AssessmentWestern Carolina UniversityAASCUJul
y 24-27, 2008
2Introduction
- Our roles at WCU
- Our roles in developing implementing integrated
learning at WCU - Synthesis A pathway to intentional learning
www.wcu.edu/sacs/qep
3Overarching Goal
- To empower students to integrate knowledge and
skills from their academic and co-curricular
experiences to become intentional participants in
their own learning.
4Objectives
- Outline process used to develop and refine model
for integrated learning - Describe organizational changes
- Discuss assessment framework
- Share lessons learned
5Western Carolina University
- 9,000 students
- Rural, WNC
- 480 full-time faculty
- 130 degree programs
- UNC System
- Public, Regional
- Boyer Model
- Endowed Professors (25)
- Honors College (1250)
- Regional Stewardship
- Civic Engagement
6Integrated Learning at WCU
7Learning Relationships Source Dr. L. Dee Fink
8Process-Development of Theme
- Early Stage Broad-based involvement iterative
2-year data collection and data review - Mid Stage Narrow focus and further refinement 9
month institutional conversation - Late Stage Development of plan and institutional
buy-in 6 month drafting and revising
9Process - Implementation
- Pilot Phase 3 5 years
- Program Assessment 5 6 years
- Full Implementation 6 10 years
10Organizational Structure
- QEP Steering Committee
- QEP Technology Committee
- QEP Assessment Committee
- Liberal Studies Committee
- Council on Undergraduates Early Experiences
- Strategic Planning Committee
11Alignment with Natl Trends
- AACU Integrative Learning Opportunities to
connect (2007) - AACU/Carnegie Statement on Integrative Learning
(2004) - Keeling Learning Reconsidered (2004)
- AACU Greater Expectations A new vision for
learning as a nation goes to college (2002) - Boyer Scholarship of Engagement (1995)
12Office of Undergraduate Studies
- QEP Oversight
- Service Learning
- Liberal Studies
- American Democracy Project
- Undergraduates Early Experiences
13Implementation
- Academic units
- Chemistry
- Recreation Therapy
- History
- Health Information Administration
- Examples of non-academic units
- Coulter Faculty Center
- Residential Living
- Mountain Heritage Center
14Assessment Framework
- Learning Domains
- Understanding of self
- Intellectual flexibility and versatility, and
-
- Integrated learning
15Assessment Framework
- Learning Outcomes
- Integrate information from a variety of contexts
- Solve complex problems
- Communicate effectively and responsibly
- Practice civic engagement
- Clarify and act on purpose and values
16Assessment Framework
17Assessment Framework
18Assessment Framework
- Dimensions of assessment
- Process evaluation evaluation of institutional
support and effort (Inputs) - Student Learning Outcomes assessment (Outputs)
19Assessment Framework
- Goals of assessment
- Students ability to integrate information across
content and context - Effectiveness of program/service
- Impact of formative and analytic mechanisms to
guide improvements
20Lessons Learned
- Incorporate student learning outcomes
- Project a realistic budget and accompanying
timeline for implementation - Include faculty rewards/development to support
plan - Carefully define terms, e.g., engaged learning,
for all constituents - Do homework build grassroots support
- Connect plan to strategic, other key plans
21Lessons Learnedcontd
- Create an effective, realistic, assessment plan
at outset - Learning goals should drive assessment
- Use assessment to show successes
- Include student voice in any plan
- Student learning is not limited to the classroom
22Questions
23Contact Us
- Carol Burton burton_at_email.wcu.edu
- Melissa Canady Wargo wargo_at_email.wcu.edu