Small Changes, Big Rewards: Integrating the Disparate Threads of Undergraduate Education to Create a - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Small Changes, Big Rewards: Integrating the Disparate Threads of Undergraduate Education to Create a

Description:

Small Changes, Big Rewards: Integrating the Disparate Threads of ... CatWalk. Orientation. Writing Comp. First Year Seminar. Transition to College course ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: amc70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Small Changes, Big Rewards: Integrating the Disparate Threads of Undergraduate Education to Create a


1
Small Changes, Big Rewards Integrating the
Disparate Threads of Undergraduate Education to
Create a Learning-Centered InstitutionCarol
Burton, Assistant Vice Chancellor, Undergraduate
StudiesMelissa Canady Wargo, Director,
AssessmentWestern Carolina UniversityAASCUJul
y 24-27, 2008
2
Introduction
  • Our roles at WCU
  • Our roles in developing implementing integrated
    learning at WCU
  • Synthesis A pathway to intentional learning
    www.wcu.edu/sacs/qep

3
Overarching Goal
  • To empower students to integrate knowledge and
    skills from their academic and co-curricular
    experiences to become intentional participants in
    their own learning.

4
Objectives
  • Outline process used to develop and refine model
    for integrated learning
  • Describe organizational changes
  • Discuss assessment framework
  • Share lessons learned

5
Western Carolina University
  • 9,000 students
  • Rural, WNC
  • 480 full-time faculty
  • 130 degree programs
  • UNC System
  • Public, Regional
  • Boyer Model
  • Endowed Professors (25)
  • Honors College (1250)
  • Regional Stewardship
  • Civic Engagement

6
Integrated Learning at WCU
7
Learning Relationships Source Dr. L. Dee Fink
8
Process-Development of Theme
  • Early Stage Broad-based involvement iterative
    2-year data collection and data review
  • Mid Stage Narrow focus and further refinement 9
    month institutional conversation
  • Late Stage Development of plan and institutional
    buy-in 6 month drafting and revising

9
Process - Implementation
  • Pilot Phase 3 5 years
  • Program Assessment 5 6 years
  • Full Implementation 6 10 years

10
Organizational Structure
  • QEP Steering Committee
  • QEP Technology Committee
  • QEP Assessment Committee
  • Liberal Studies Committee
  • Council on Undergraduates Early Experiences
  • Strategic Planning Committee

11
Alignment with Natl Trends
  • AACU Integrative Learning Opportunities to
    connect (2007)
  • AACU/Carnegie Statement on Integrative Learning
    (2004)
  • Keeling Learning Reconsidered (2004)
  • AACU Greater Expectations A new vision for
    learning as a nation goes to college (2002)
  • Boyer Scholarship of Engagement (1995)

12
Office of Undergraduate Studies
  • QEP Oversight
  • Service Learning
  • Liberal Studies
  • American Democracy Project
  • Undergraduates Early Experiences

13
Implementation
  • Academic units
  • Chemistry
  • Recreation Therapy
  • History
  • Health Information Administration
  • Examples of non-academic units
  • Coulter Faculty Center
  • Residential Living
  • Mountain Heritage Center

14
Assessment Framework
  • Learning Domains
  • Understanding of self
  • Intellectual flexibility and versatility, and
  • Integrated learning

15
Assessment Framework
  • Learning Outcomes
  • Integrate information from a variety of contexts
  • Solve complex problems
  • Communicate effectively and responsibly
  • Practice civic engagement
  • Clarify and act on purpose and values

16
Assessment Framework
17
Assessment Framework
18
Assessment Framework
  • Dimensions of assessment
  • Process evaluation evaluation of institutional
    support and effort (Inputs)
  • Student Learning Outcomes assessment (Outputs)

19
Assessment Framework
  • Goals of assessment
  • Students ability to integrate information across
    content and context
  • Effectiveness of program/service
  • Impact of formative and analytic mechanisms to
    guide improvements

20
Lessons Learned
  • Incorporate student learning outcomes
  • Project a realistic budget and accompanying
    timeline for implementation
  • Include faculty rewards/development to support
    plan
  • Carefully define terms, e.g., engaged learning,
    for all constituents
  • Do homework build grassroots support
  • Connect plan to strategic, other key plans

21
Lessons Learnedcontd
  • Create an effective, realistic, assessment plan
    at outset
  • Learning goals should drive assessment
  • Use assessment to show successes
  • Include student voice in any plan
  • Student learning is not limited to the classroom

22
Questions
23
Contact Us
  • Carol Burton burton_at_email.wcu.edu
  • Melissa Canady Wargo wargo_at_email.wcu.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com