Lean Principles and Applications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Lean Principles and Applications

Description:

'Similar to major corporations, universities must remain competitive ... is like trying to pull a handcart up a steep hill -- there's always tremendous danger. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:243
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: yam47
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lean Principles and Applications


1
Lean Principles and Applications
  • Pawley Institute
  • 2005

2
Pawley Institute
  • Institute was created at the behest and financial
    contribution of Mr. Dennis Pawley to develop a
    lean curriculum and advance lean learning for OU
    students.
  • To date, there are three OU schools
    participating
  • SBA
  • SEHS
  • SECS
  • Kevin Yamada Executive Director

3
Pawley Institute
  • Similar to major corporations, universities must
    remain competitive to produce a better
    productfuture employees. Theres a great need
    to expand educational opportunities to students
    nationwide. As we look forward to the next
    century, America can only remain a leader in
    manufacturing through joint efforts between
    universities and corporations. Thats why
    developing specific curricula to meet those
    challenges are so important

Dennis Pawley 2002
4
Pawley Institute
  • Mission
  • Give Oakland University, its students and
    graduates, and the community a competitive
    advantage through education, research, and the
    application of lean principles and practices.

5
Firsts
  • First OU course offered specifically on the
    subject of Lean.
  • First time in OUs history that three schools are
    teaching and attending a common course.
  • First time an OU course has combined the
    disciplines of human resource development,
    business systems and engineering systems in a
    dynamic (lean) learning curriculum.
  • First time real life team projects are conducted
    with an interdisciplinary mix of students from
    each school.

6
Lean Fundamentals
  • History
  • Philosophy
  • Definitions
  • Myths

7
Tip of the tip of the Iceberg
  • Introduction to lean philosophy
  • Build awareness
  • Familiarity with some terms
  • Begin a change in thinking

8
Tip of the tip of the Iceberg
  • Introduction to lean philosophy
  • Build awareness
  • Familiarity with some terms
  • Begin a change in thinking
  • Beyond the surface
  • Internalization of concepts
  • Deep understanding of current reality
  • Create a change-receptive culture
  • Recognize and attack causes of waste
  • Never ending quest for perfection

9
A Brief History of Lean
  • Originally known as the Toyota Precepts, the
    development of the Toyota Production System (TPS)
    is often associated with five people
  • Sakichi Toyoda (family name)
  • Kiichiro Toyoda
  • Eiji Toyoda
  • Taiichi Ohno
  • Shigeo Shingo

10
A Brief History of Lean
  • Originally known as the Toyota Precepts, the
    development of the Toyota Production System (TPS)
    is often associated with five people
  • Sakichi Toyoda (family name)
  • Kiichiro Toyoda
  • Eiji Toyoda
  • Taiichi Ohno
  • Shigeo Shingo
  • In 1933, Kiichiro Toyoda (son of founder, Sakichi
    Toyoda) formed Toyota Motor Co. as a spin off
    from Toyoda Spinning and Weaving, a successful
    manufacturer of fabrics that introduced the
    concepts autonomation and JIT. In April 1936,
    production of the Toyota Model AA began.

11
A Brief History of Lean
  • Originally known as the Toyota Precepts, the
    development of the Toyota Production System (TPS)
    is often associated with five people
  • Sakichi Toyoda (family name)
  • Kiichiro Toyoda
  • Eiji Toyoda
  • Taiichi Ohno
  • Shigeo Shingo
  • In 1933, Kiichiro Toyoda (son of founder, Sakichi
    Toyoda) formed Toyota Motor Co. as a spin off
    from Toyoda Spinning and Weaving, a successful
    manufacturer of fabrics that introduced the
    concepts autonomation and JIT. In April 1936,
    production of the Toyota Model AA began.
  • However, prior to the official launch of Toyota
    Motor Company, the historic pilgrimage by
    Kiichiro was made to the Ford Rouge complex in
    Dearborn, MI.

12
A Brief History of Lean
  • In 1943, Ohno joined Toyota Motor Co. after
    working at the Toyoda Spinning and Weaving. He
    led the refinement of TPS for the next 40 years.
    He too visited US auto plants and noted then that
    American autoworkers were nine (9) times more
    productive than their Japanese automotive counter
    parts.
  • Based on the high productivity of Japanese
    textile workers, Toyota concluded that the
    disparity was not in the people but in the system
    of production.

13
A Brief History of Lean
  • At that time, sharp contrasts existed between
    Ford and Toyota
  • At Ford
  • Each assembly plant specialized in its own
    product family.
  • Rouge alone produced 7000 similar vehicles/day.
  • Product oriented (pre-lean) layouts were
    abandoned for mass production based on process
    villages, each with their own large stockpiles
    or batches of materials.
  • At Toyota
  • Based on limited post-war resources Toyota Motor
    plant produced a variety of vehicles, primarily
    trucks, in small volumes of 40/day.
  • By 1950, after 13 years, only a total of 2700
    vehicles were produced.
  • Again, due to their post- war economy, it was not
    feasible to carry large stockpiles and it was
    absolutely essential to convert invested capital
    to revenue as quickly as possible.

14
A Brief History of Lean
  • Due primarily to these external forces, Toyota
    executives came up with a completely different
    way of thinking about manufacturing.
  • From 1950 to 1970 Toyota began to lead the way by
    developing their own alternative to the Ford
    (mass) production system.
  • TOYOTA PRODUCTION SYSTEM
  • (TPS)

15
A Brief History of Lean
  • The term lean was introduced in a landmark
    Sloan Management Review (1988) article about the
    future of the automobile by John Krafcik and was
    based upon a 5 year/5 million MIT study of 90
    automotive plants in 17 countries.
  • The (inevitable) book published in 1991
    summarizing this study, The Machine that Changed
    the World, by Womack, Jones, Roos, coined the
    term lean production to describe the Toyota
    Production System (TPS).

16
Todays Missions
  • Ford Motor Company
  • Mission
  • Ford is a worldwide leader in automotive and
    automotive related products and services as well
    as in newer industries such as aerospace,
    communications and financial services.
  • Our mission is to improve continuously our
    products and services to meet our customers
    needs, allowing us to prosper as a business and
    to provide a reasonable return to our
    stockholders, the owners of our business.
  • Toyota Motor Manufacturing
  • Mission
  • Add value to customers and society.
  • As an American company, contribute to the
    economic growth of the community and the US.
  • As an independent company, contribute to the
    stability and well being of team members and
    partners.
  • As a Toyota group company, contribute to the
    overall growth of Toyota.

17
Lean Philosophy
  • Never ending quest for perfection and a
    continuous, systematic elimination of waste
    (muda) and its root causes.
  • Constantly shortening the (lead or cycle) time
    required by streamlining the flow of production
    throughout the value stream.
  • from customer order to delivery of
    product/service
  • from design concept to customer satisfaction
  • Seek to maximize operational efficiency,
    throughput, flexibility, quality, costs and
    responsiveness by increasing the effectiveness of
    people, equipment and systems.
  • An overriding respect for people and appreciation
    of human creativity.

18
Definition of Lean
  • The systematic approach in identifying and
    eliminating waste, or non-value added-activities
    through continuous improvement by moving the
    product at the pull of the customer in pursuit of
    perfection NIST/MEP (28)
  • An operating philosophy in which the best
    quality, cost and delivery of a product or
    service is achieved through shortening the
    production flow by eliminating waste Toyota
    (26)
  • Give the customer what they want when they want
    it, and don't waste anything Anonymous (14)
  • A strategy for remaining competitive through the
    endless pursuit of waste elimination Gemba
    Research (12)
  • Standardized thinking Flinchbaugh (2)
  • Steak Yamada (1)

19
Paradox of Lean
  • Stop production when necessary so that production
    never has to stop.
  • Standards change all the time.
  • One (unit) at a time is more effective than
    batch.
  • Maximizing unit efficiencies does not maximize
    overall efficiency.
  • Dont make something unless a customer has
    ordered it.
  • Team members, not industrial engineers, develop
    standardized work.
  • Continually seek perfection, even though we know
    we will never achieve it.

20
Myths and Misconceptions
  • Lean
  • is a Japanese philosophy.
  • concepts and principles apply only to the
    automotive industry or manufacturing.
  • means busting unions and getting rid of people.
  • is the magic pill cure for all business and
    industry problems.
  • is just a flavor of the month, passing fad.
  • is a grass roots program.

21
DefinitionValue Add vs. Non Value Add
  • Value Add Anything that changes or further
    transforms a product, sub-assembly, information
    or service into something that the customer is
    willing to pay for.
  • Non Value Add Any activity that absorbs or
    consumes resources (e.g.- material, time,
    equipment, people, paper, space) without creating
    value. Typically, two (2) types.
  • Type 1 can be eliminated immediately
  • Type 2 due to current state, cannot yet be
    eliminated

22
Non Value Add Waste muda
  • Waste exists in hundreds of forms in virtually
    every workplace causing slower production,
    decreasing efficiency, blocking growth and
    consuming resources, and is traditionally broken
    into 7 components
  • Waste is often difficult to see because
  • people appear to be busy
  • sub-optimization of process villages vs.
    optimizing entire value streams
  • comfort in legacy systems and old habits
  • more is better

23
Value Add vs. Non Value Add
1. ______ Delivery of supplies Just In Time (JIT)
from the supplier to the plant. 2. ______
Locating the proper tools and equipment needed to
changeover for the next operational run. 3.
______ Having operators collect SPC data and
fill out quality forms. 4. ______ Performing
open heart surgery on a patient 5. ______
Inspecting product for defects so they dont
reach the customer 6. ______ Moving a patient
from the operating room to cardiac rehab. 7.
______ Final assembly of gears to be located in
differential case. 8. ______ Billing the cell
phone customer for services rendered.
NVA
NVA
NVA
VA
NVA
NVA
VA
NVA
24
Value Add vs. Non Value Add
VA 5
NVA 95
25
  • True cost is the size of a plum seed
  • Taiichi Ohno
  • The father and chief architect
  • of the Toyota Production System

26
Definition of 7 Wastes 1
  • Over productionahead of demand
  • Waitingfor information, materials, people,
    equipment, etc., causing inefficient use of time
  • Transportationconveyance of materials, product,
    paperwork, etc., more than is necessary
  • Over-processing...often associated with
    overkill, includes any form of inspection
  • Inventorieshaving more than absolute minimum.
  • Motionof people more than necessary to complete
    task
  • Defects or Rework
  • Knowledgedisconnection which inhibits flow of
    knowledge, ideas and creativity

27
Non Lean vs. Lean Culture
  • Non Lean
  • Production is based on anticipated need
  • Infinite capacity is assumed
  • Bottlenecks are hidden and lead times expanded
  • More and faster is better
  • Overproduction is good
  • If it aint broken, dont fix it
  • Dont stop production
  • Fire fight, but dont stop to fix the root
    cause of the problem
  • Front line workers are responsible for output

28
Non Lean vs. Lean Culture
  • Non Lean
  • Production is based on anticipated need
  • Infinite capacity is assumed
  • Bottlenecks are hidden and lead times expanded
  • More and faster is better
  • Overproduction is good
  • If it aint broken, dont fix it
  • Dont stop production
  • Fire fight, but dont stop to fix the root
    cause of the problem
  • Front line workers are responsible for output
  • Lean
  • Make next persons job easier
  • Produce only what is needed when it is needed
  • Overproduction is evil
  • If it aint broke, improve it
  • Never pass on a defect
  • Work on root causes
  • Managers/supervisors are responsible for enabling
    workers to do their jobs more effectively

29
  • Running Toyota is like trying to pull a handcart
    up a steep hill -- there's always tremendous
    danger. If we relax, even for a moment, we could
    lose momentum and be thrown to the bottom."  
  • Fujio Cho
  • CEO - Toyota

30
  • What do you see?

31
  • What lean thinkers see

muda
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com