While you wait for the webinar to begin, please test your audio connection. You should hear music playing. If not, please follow these steps: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

While you wait for the webinar to begin, please test your audio connection. You should hear music playing. If not, please follow these steps:

Description:

While you wait for the webinar to begin, please test your audio connection. You should hear music playing. If not, please follow these steps: Click Meeting in top ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: olmsCteJ
Learn more at: http://olms.ctejhu.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: While you wait for the webinar to begin, please test your audio connection. You should hear music playing. If not, please follow these steps:


1
Welcome!
  • While you wait for the webinar to begin, please
    test your audio connection. You should hear music
    playing. If not, please follow these steps
  • Click Meeting in top left on the menu bar
  • Click Audio Setup Wizard
  • Follow the steps provided to test your audio
    connection (NOTE You will NOT need a working
    microphone, you will only need to ensure that you
    can HEAR SOUND)
  • If after running the test, you are still unable
    to hear the music track, please type a message in
    the Tech Support chat box to the left of the
    presentation screen.

2
General Adobe Connect Information
  • Technical Concerns
  • Type your issue in the Tech Support Chat Pod
    located in the lower left corner of your screen

3
General Adobe Connect Information
  • Full Screen View
  • Click the Full Screen button in the top right

4
Family Outcomes Webinar
  • Taking a Closer Look at Family Outcomes Results

Presenter Pam Miller, MSDE/DSE/EIS/ECIE Moderat
or Amy Sargent, JHU/CTE
5
Definition of Family OutcomesPart C Indicator 4
  • Percent of families participating in Part C who
    report that early intervention services have
    helped the family
  • a) know their rights,
  • b) effectively communicate their childrens
    needs, and
  • c) help their children develop and learn.

6
Early Intervention Family Outcomes 2010-2011
Results
  • Response Rate 39.7
  • Percent of families reporting that early
    intervention services helped them.
  • Know their rights 93 (State Target 78)
  • Effectively communicate 93 (State Target
    76) their children's
    needs
  • Help their children 94 (State Target
    86)
  • develop and learn

7
Family Survey Response Rates By Year
SFY 2007-2011
SFY 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentage/number of early intervention family survey responses 231,476/ 6,395 22.21,570/ 7,078 29.62,017/ 6,813 41.73,384/ 8,109 39.7 3,589/ 9,036
  • Review Local Response Rate Data

8
Family Survey Results By YearSFY 2007-2011
9
A Different Way to Look at
the Data
10
Extended IFSP Option ResultsSFY 2010 and 2011
Question 1
  • Over the past year, Early Intervention services
    have helped me and/or my family understand my
    options in order to make the best choice for my
    child and family to continue services through an
    extended Individualized Family Service Plan or
    move to services through an Individualized
    Education Program
  • SFY 2010 Results 97 (188/194)
  • SFY 2011 Results 91 (834/917)

11
Extended IFSP Option ResultsSFY 2010 and 2011
Question 2
  • Over the past year, Early Intervention services
    have helped me and/or my family support my child
    to be ready for school by assisting me to teach
    my child pre-reading activities (such as naming
    pictures) and pre-math activities (such as
    sorting household items).
  • SFY 2010 Results 96 (182/190)
  • SFY 2011 Results 91 (791/872)

12
A Closer Look at Representativeness
  • Race/Ethnicity
  • Spanish/English
  • Gender
  • Age at Referral
  • Eligibility Category
  • Jurisdiction

13
Representativeness by Race
SFY 2011 Survey Responses vs. Active/Eligible
14
Representativeness by Language
SFY 2011 Survey Responses vs. Active/Eligible
15
Representativeness by Gender SFY
2011 Survey Responses vs. Active/Eligible
16
Representativeness by Age at Time of Referral
SFY 2011 Survey Responses vs.
Active/Eligible
17
Representativeness by Eligibility Category
SFY 2011 Survey Responses vs. Active/Eligible
18
Representativeness by JurisdictionSFY 2011
Survey Responses vs. Active/Eligible
Local Infants Toddlers Program Percentage of Children Active/Eligible Percentage of Survey Responses Number of Children Active/Eligible Number of Survey Responses
Baltimore City 10 5 875 183
Baltimore County 15 19 1,353 692
Montgomery County 22 17 1,970 624
Prince Georges County 12 15 1,072 532
19
Analyzing Demographic Information and Statewide
Family Outcome Results
20
Family Outcomes By Race/Ethnicity
21
Family Outcomes By Gender
22
Family Outcomes By English/Spanish Survey
23
Family Outcome s By Eligibility Category
24
Family Outcomes By Age At the Time of
Referral
25
Family Outcomes By Age at Time of Survey
Completion
26
Family Outcomes By Length of Time in the Program
27
Family Outcomes By Relationship to Child
28
Now Its Your Turn A Closer Look at Local Family
Outcomes Data
29
Now For a New Way to Look at the Data
Mean Score Overall and By Survey Question
Statewide/Local Jurisdiction
Local Infants Toddlers Program Mean Score Q20 Q18 Q19 Q12 Q17 Q16 Q11 Q15 Q13 Q6 Q14 Q5 Q10 Q21 Q22 Q9 Q7 Q8 Q3 Q4 Q2 Q1
Statewide Total 4.9 5.1 5.1 5.0 5.0 4.9 5.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.6
30
Questions to Consider With Your Local Team?
  • Is our family outcomes data representative of the
    families we serve?
  • How does our local data compare to the Statewide
    data?
  • Response Rate
  • Indicator 4a, 4b, and 4c
  • Local Family Outcome Data Profile
  • Mean Overall Score/Mean Score on Each Question
  • What conclusions can we draw from the data?
  • What additional questions do we need to ask?
    (i.e., What family-centered practices in our
    jurisdiction relate to each survey question?)
  • What action steps can we take?

31
Family Outcomes and Monitoring
  • For OSEP Performance Indicators 4a, 4b, 4c an
    improvement plan is required if the local lead
    agency/local school system does not achieve the
    State target.
  • Related Requirement Response Rate An
    improvement plan may be assigned based on
    response rate data significantly below the State
    average.

32
Using Local Data for Program
Improvement
  • Review, share and analyze your family outcomes
    data.
  • Continue local strategies that are working for
    program improvement around family outcomes.
  • Focus on the three family outcome indicators
    specifically, but consider all the family outcome
    indicators in your local program improvement
    efforts.
  • Incorporate family-centered best practices in
    every aspect of early intervention service
    delivery to enhance your local program
    improvement efforts.

33
Questions
  • For specific questions regarding your
    jurisdictions Early Intervention Family Outcome
    survey data, please contact
  • Pam Miller
  • Quality Assurance Specialist,
  • Maryland State Department of Education
  • Division of Special Education/Early Intervention
    Services
  • Early Childhood Intervention and Education Branch
  • 410-767-1019 (Phone)  
  • pmiller_at_msde.state.md.us (Email)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com