Urban Land Use: lessons from the Urban Atlas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Urban Land Use: lessons from the Urban Atlas

Description:

Urban Land Use: lessons from the Urban Atlas Lewis Dijkstra Deputy Head of the Analysis Unit European Commission DG Regional Policy Lewis.Dijkstra_at_ec.europa.eu – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:279
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: HugoPo5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Urban Land Use: lessons from the Urban Atlas


1
Urban Land Use lessons from the Urban Atlas
  • Lewis Dijkstra
  • Deputy Head of the Analysis Unit
  • European Commission DG Regional Policy
  • Lewis.Dijkstra_at_ec.europa.eu

2
Overview
  • New grid based definitions
  • Urban-rural regional typology Urban clusters
  • Degree of urbanisation
  • Cities and hinterland High-density clusters and
    commuting zones
  • Measuring urban land use
  • CORINE
  • Soil sealing
  • Urban Atlas

3
A new urban-rural regional typology
  • Classifying EU NUTS3 regions
  • A variant of the OECD methodology
  • Aiming to provide a consistent basis for
    describing urban, intermediate and rural regions
    in various Commission reports and publications
  • Developed by
  • DG Agriculture and Rural Development
  • DG Regional Policy
  • Eurostat
  • DG Joint Research Centre

4
Why a new typology?
  • Distortions using the OECD methodology at NUTS3
    level
  • Large variation in area of local administrative
    units (LAU2)
  • Large variation in area of NUTS3 regions
  • Some city centres separated from surroundings, at
    NUTS3 level

5
The new typology local level
  • Units 1 km² grid cells
  • Population grid registered population when
    available, otherwise disaggregation grid (JRC)
  • Identify population living in urban areas
  • Selection of grid cells with density gt 300
    inh./km²
  • Only groups of grid cells, representing a total
    population of gt 5000 inhabitants
  • Contiguity is evaluated including diagonals

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
What is degree of urbanisation?
  • Classification of all LAU2s into three
    categories
  • Thinly populated
  • Intermediate density
  • Densely populated
  • It is used primarily in the Labour Force Survey
    (LFS), but also in other surveys such as Survey
    on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) and IT
  • It is based on LAU2 density and contiguity
  • In use for 20 years

11
Why a revision?
  • Distortions due to the large variation in area of
    local administrative units (LAU2)
  • Revised urban-rural typology is based on a grid
    based definition of rural areas which is more
    reliable than OECD or LFS approach
  • Harmonising spatial concepts
  • Rural (OECD) and thinly populated areas (LFS)
  • Densely populated areas (LFS) and cities (UA)

12
Previously 3 conflicting definitions
Urban-Rural Typology Degree of urbanisation Urban Audit
Rural LAU2 ? Thinly populated
Intermediate density
Densely populated ? Cities
13
New Proposal Harmonised definition based on
population grid
Revised Degree of urbanisaton
Thinly populated ? Rural LAU2
Intermediate density
Densely populated ? Urban Audit Cities
14
New Proposal 3 Criteria 3 Classes
Type of Area Criteria
Thinly populated gt 50 population in rural grid cells
Intermediate density lt50 population in rural grid cells and lt50 population in high-density grid cells
Densely populated gt 50 population in high-density grid cells
15
Definitions
  • Rural grid cells cells outside urban clusters
  • Urban clusters contiguous (including diagonals)
    cells with a density of at least 300 inhab/km2
    and a minimum of 5 000 inhabitants
  • High-density clusters contiguous (without
    diagonals and with gap filling) cells with a
    density of at least 1500 inhab/km2 and a minimum
    of 50 000 inhabitants

16
Population grid
  • Units 1 km² grid cells (future reference for all
    population grids)
  • Registered population in NO, CH, HR, AT, FI, SE,
    DK and NL
  • Elsewhere disaggregation grid v5 (JRC)
  • FR is creating a real 1 km2 population grid

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
City and hinterland definition
21
Why a new definition?
  • No harmonised European definition of a city and
    its functional area existed
  • Use the same criteria as the degree of
    urbanisation
  • Uses commuting analysis to define commuting zone
  • Consider poly-centricity by checking for
    connected centres

22
City definition
  • A city consists of one or more municipalities
    (local administrative unit level 2 LAU2).
  • At least half of the city residents live in an
    urban centre (i.e. a cluster of high-density grid
    cells with the gaps filled)
  • An urban centre has at least 50 000 inhabitants.

23
City definition
24
Hinterland definition
  • If 15 of employed persons living in one city
    work in another city, these cities are combined
    into a single destination (polycentric)
  • All municipalities with at least 15 of their
    employed residents working in a city are
    identified
  • Municipalities surrounded by a single functional
    area are included and non-contiguous
    municipalities are dropped

25
Hinterland definition
26
Urban Land Use
27
Goal and obstacles
  • Accurately measure urban land use, especially at
    the urban fringe
  • CORINE is designed to mainly measure agricultural
    uses, coarse resolution and does not identify
    low-density developed (i.e. below 50 of soil
    sealing)
  • Soil sealing, high resolution and measures all
    levels of sealing, but no land use info

28
The Urban Atlas
  • Designed to measure urban land use at high
    resolution and at low levels of soil sealing
  • Providing harmonised land cover/land use maps
    according to a common classification
  • Covering 305 major European agglomerations, based
    on Urban Audits Larger Urban Zones
  • Imagery reference year 2006 (/- 1 year)
  • Project duration 2009-2011

29
Main features
  • Thematic classes based on CORINE Land Cover
    nomenclature
  • But more specific for built-up areas, and less
    specific outside urban areas
  • Geometric resolution of 110,000
  • Minimum mapping unit of 0.25 ha in urban areas, 1
    ha in other areas

30
CORINE Land Cover
31
Urban Atlas
32
SPOT / ALOS images
33
Production
  • Mix of automatic classification and
    photo-interpretation
  • Various data sources used, depending on thematic
    classes

34
Thematic classes
  • Residential areas use of soil sealing layer to
    distinguish between density classes

35
Thematic classes
  • Non-residential urban areas
  • Detailed transport network layer (COTS)
  • Local maps as auxiliary source of information

36
Thematic classes
  • Other classes
  • Less thematic detail for agricultural, natural
    and forest areas (and MMU 1 ha)

37
Dissemination
  • Georeferenced layers are freely available
  • Data download
  • http//www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/urban
    -atlas
  • Map viewer http//dataservice.eea.europa.eu/map/U
    rbanAtlasbeta/

38
Derived indicators
  • Can be exploited at the level of Urban Audit
    units
  • Larger Urban Zone (LUZ), kernel, city, sub-city
    districts (SCD)
  • Land cover/use surface breakdown
  • Green urban areas per inhabitant
  • A sprawl index (ESPON project) www.espon.eu

39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
The future of the Urban Atlas
  • Repeat Urban Atlas in order to create a detailed
    dynamic view on urban land cover/use
  • Coherence with other data collection projects is
    important
  • Census 2011
  • Urban Audit
  • Consequences
  • Define imagery acquisition requirements (2011 /-
    year)
  • Update methodology, including change detection,
    to be determined
  • Ensure compatibility with revised Urban Audit
    following new harmonised definition
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com