The Effect of Primary Health Care Orientation on Chronic Illness Care Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

The Effect of Primary Health Care Orientation on Chronic Illness Care Management

Description:

Title: The Effect of Primary Care Practice Orientation on Chronic Care Illness Management Author: julie Last modified by: julie Created Date: 1/30/2003 5:27:04 PM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:328
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Jul6100
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Effect of Primary Health Care Orientation on Chronic Illness Care Management


1
The Effect of Primary Health Care Orientation on
Chronic Illness Care Management
  • Julie Schmittdiel, Ph.D.,
  • Stephen M. Shortell, Ph.D.,
  • Thomas Rundall, Ph.D.
  • AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting
  • June 7, 2004
  • (Funded by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Award
    038690)

2
Introduction
  • Chronic illness places huge burden on U.S. health
    care system 125 million patients generate 75 of
    costs
  • Institute of Medicine(2001) reports a quality
    chasm in chronic illness care provided to
    patients
  • Improving chronic illness care delivery in the
    primary care setting has great potential for
    helping bridge chasm (Bodenheimer, Wagner and
    Grumbach 2002)

3
Introduction, cont.
  • Focus on acute problems and episodic care makes
    current primary care system ill-equipped to deal
    with chronic illness
  • A focus on comprehensive care and overall patient
    health (primary health care) could create an
    ideal environment for improved chronic illness
    care
  • Lack of empirical work examining whether greater
    primary health care orientation relates to
    improved chronic illness care processes

4
Research Question
  • Does a physician organizations primary health
    care orientation affect its delivery of chronic
    illness care?

5
The Chronic Care Model (Wagner et al)
  • Community Linkages mobilize community resources
    for chronic illness patients
  • Health System Organization leadership commitment
    to chronic illness care and its outcome
  • Patient Self-Management Support encourage
    lifestyle changes and developing of illness
    management skills
  • Delivery System Design offer team-based care and
    patient follow-up
  • Decision Support for Providers train providers
    in evidence-based guidelines and give access to
    specialist expertise
  • Clinical Information Systems electronic medical
    data systems use for provider feedback,
    reminders, and care planning
  • See www.improvingchroniccare.org for more details

6
Primary Health Care (Starfield 1992)
  • First Contact primary care providers provide
    window to use of specialists
  • Continuity primary care provider/patient
    relationship is long-term and consistent
  • Comprehensiveness primary care provides wide
    range of services across settings
  • Coordination primary care coordinates with care
    from other sources
  • Accountability primary care providers feel
    ultimately responsible for overall patient health

7
Research Hypothesis
  • Similarities across concepts suggest that
    organizations practicing primary health care may
    be more committed to the Chronic Care Model.
  • Research Hypothesis Physician organizations
    with a high degree of overall primary health care
    orientation will have a higher degree of Chronic
    Care Model implementation.

8
Data Source
  • National Study of Physician Organizations (NSPO)
  • Cross-sectional survey of all U.S. physician
    organizations with 20 or more MDs
  • Data collected from Sept. 2000-Sept. 2001
  • Assessed chronic illness care processes, IT,
    external incentives, organizational/financial
    characteristics
  • 70 response rate n64 treating no chronic
    illness deleted
  • Result of n1,040 organizations for analysis

further information and survey instrument
available at http//nspo.berkeley.edu
9
Dependent Variable Chronic Care Model Index
11-point Chronic Care Model Index Mean(SD) 4.6 (2.9)
Agreements with Comm. Services Agencies 20.2
Referrals to Comm. Services Agencies 32.4
Assess Self-Management Needs 44.8
Self-Management Programs 56.6
Integrate Guidelines into Care 51.4
Integrate Specialists into Care 62.2
Utilize Planned Visits 56.0
Multiple Providers Seen in one Visit 36.3
Employ Case Managers 34.2
Written Feedback to MDs 36.6
Internet Comm. between MDs and Patients 25.9
10
Independent Variables Primary Health Care
Orientation
Comprehensiveness Severe Chronic Illness Treated in Primary Care (range 0-4) mean (SD) .50 (.90)
Health Promotions Index (range 0-8) mean (SD) 2.5 (2.6)
Patient Education Index (range 0-4) mean (SD) 2.4 (1.5)
Coordination Use of Electronic Medical Record ( yes) 21.0
Use of Electronic Standardized Problem List ( yes) 17.7
Accountability Required Outside Reporting Index (range 0-4) mean (SD) 0.8 (1.4)
Patients PO Accepts Risk for Hospital Costs mean (SD) 22.0 (36.3)
Continuity Primary Care Physician Turnover Rate mean (SD) 5.7 (8.4)
11
Method of Analysis Multivariate Linear
Regression
  • Chronic Care Model Implementation Index
  • f(Primary Health Care Orientation Variables,
  • control variables)
  • controlling for organization age, size, number
    of clinics, region, ownership, organization type,
    capitalization, county-level HMO penetration

12
Analysis Results
Primary Health Care Orientation Variables B (S.E)
Comprehensiveness Severe Chronic Illness Treated in Primary Care .21 (.08)
Health Promotions Index .39(.03)
Patient Education Index .28 (.05)
Coordination Use of Electronic Medical Record .30 (.23)
Use of Electronic Standardized Problem List .51 (.23)
Accountability Required Outside Reporting Index .25 (.06)
Patients PO Accepts Risk for Hospital Costs .006(.002)
Continuity Primary Care Physician Turnover Rate -.01 (.009)
plt.001 plt.01 plt.05
13
Summary of Results
  • Strong support for Research Hypothesis
  • Six of eight primary health care orientation
    variables significantly related to index of
    Chronic Care Model implementation
  • Low levels of primary health care orientation in
    U.S. physician organizations
  • Limited use of Chronic Care Model

14
Health Policy Implications
  • Empirical justification for improving chronic
    illness care within a primary health care setting
  • Increasing primary health care orientation in
    physician organizations may improve chronic
    illness care processes
  • By facilitating changes in the primary care
    system, stakeholders could benefit people with
    chronic illness

15
Conclusion
  • Chronic illness places a great burden on health
    care system
  • This and other research demonstrates much room to
    improve quality of chronic illness care
  • Creating a health care system with a greater
    primary health care orientation may help bridge
    quality chasm in chronic illness care
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com