SPNs and the Early Detection of Lung Cancer George Erbacher D.O., FAOCR Chair imaging/interventional radiology OSUMC Radiology residency program director - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

SPNs and the Early Detection of Lung Cancer George Erbacher D.O., FAOCR Chair imaging/interventional radiology OSUMC Radiology residency program director

Description:

NM in Lung Cancer Role of PET in Lung Cancer Improves ... Positive and Caveats PET/CT Active necrotizing granulomas ... surpassing totals from breast, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:145
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: Preferred2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SPNs and the Early Detection of Lung Cancer George Erbacher D.O., FAOCR Chair imaging/interventional radiology OSUMC Radiology residency program director


1
SPNs and the Early
Detection of Lung CancerGeorge Erbacher D.O.,
FAOCRChair imaging/interventional radiology
OSUMCRadiology residency program director
2
DEFINITION OF SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE (SPN)
  • Single round water density mass lt 3 cm
  • Completely surrounded by lung parenchyma
  • Incidental finding 0.2 CXRs, 1 CT

3
MIMICS OF SPN
  • Chest wall lesion
  • Healing rib fracture
  • AVN
  • Abscess
  • Pneumonia
  • Immune-RA/Wegeners granulomatosis etc.

4
MIMICS OF SPN
  • Hematoma
  • Lung infarct/atelecatasis
  • Pleural plaque
  • Bronchial atresia/Sequestration
  • Inhaled FB
  • MOST COMMON BENIGN GRANULOMA/HAMARTOMA

5
PATIENT FEATURES INCREASING RISK OF MALIGNANCY
  • SMOKING ESPECIALLY gt20 PK/YEAR
  • Older age
  • Personal history of malignancy
  • First degree relative with lung cancer
  • Asbestos/uranium/radon exposure
  • Other workplace exposure- some aromatic
    hydrocarbons, coal mines etc.

6
IMAGING FEATURES BENIGN VS. MALIGNANT
  • Smaller less risk of malignancy
  • Well defined borders tend to be benign
  • If a cavity thin walls-favor benign
  • Popcorn like calcification benign
    characteristic of hamartoma
  • Density (HU) lt 15-20 benign
  • Very fast and very slow growing lesions are
    likely benign-PREVIOUS COMPARISON IMAGES ARE
    CRITICAL

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Epidemiology Lung Cancer in the World
  • Most frequently diagnosed cancer (1.04M
    in 1990)
  • Leading cause of cancer mortality
  • 921K deaths
  • Most common cancer in males and 1 cause of
    cancer death

13
Incidence Lung Cancer in U.S.
  • 171,600 cases diagnosed in 1999 (94K M 77.6K F)
  • Leading cause of cancer death M F (158.9K)
  • Kentucky highest mortality rate
  • 67.9/100K (37 above avg.)
  • Utah lowest mortality rate
  • 21.6/100K (56.4 below avg.)

14
U.S. Lung Cancer
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer
mortality in the U.S. among both men and women
surpassing totals from breast, colon, and ovarian
cancers combined. 1
1Dupuy, DE. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation
of pulmonary malignancies combined treatment
with brachytherapy. Am J Roentgenol.
2003181(3)711-5.
15
Survival
  • 5 years 14
  • 50 survive if diagnosed in early stage (small
    size IA 85 100 survival
  • Only 15 diagnosed in early stage

16
Tobacco Smoke
  • Cigarette smoking is causally related to lung
    cancerthe magnitude of the effect far outweighs
    all other factors.
  • Is leading cause of avoidable mortality in US, w/
    about 434K preventable deaths per year
  • Cost to US economy 200 billion/year
  • US surgeon general

17
CXR Screening Revisited
  • Analysis of the 4 RCT from 20 years ago (Mayo,
    Czech, Sloan-Kettering, Johns-Hopkins)
  • Czech Mayo studies found increase in mortality
    in screened vs. controls (6 increase in Mayo)
    however 29 MORE lung cancer in screening vs.
    controls

18
CXR Screening Revisited
  • Screened had 34 living _at_ 5yrs vs. 15 control
    (Sloan-Kettering, Johns-Hopkins similar results)
  • Analysis of the randomized trials strongly
    suggests CXR screening is superior to no
    screening whatsoever

19
Low Dose CT (LD CT)Screening vs. CXR
  • RationaleLD CT greatly increases detection of
    small non-calcified nodules and of lung cancer at
    an earlier/more curable stage
  • LD CT showed non-calcified nodules 3x more
    commonly
  • LD CT showed malig. tumors 4x more commonly
  • LD CT showed stage 1 tumors 6x more commonly

20
LD CT Indication (ELCAP)
  • gt 60 y.o.a.
  • gt 10 pk/y smoker no previous cancer
  • Medically fit to undergo thoracic surgery
  • Baseline LD CT, then annuals

21
ELCAP Technique Helical CT
  • 140 kVp, 40 mA
  • 21 Pitch, 10 mm slice thickness
  • Scan entire lung in 1 breath hold _at_ end
    inspiration after hyperventilation
  • Reconstruct images with bone algorithm in
    overlapping 5 mm increments
  • Only lung windows (W1500, L-650) reviewed

22
ELCAP Scoring
  • 1-6 non-calcified nodules positive
  • If no non-calcified nodules negative
  • gt 6 non-calcified nodules, diffuse
    bronchiectasis, ground glass opacities or
    combinations diffuse disease

23
ELCAP Nodule Description
  • Size (L W/2)
  • Location (lobe distance from pleura) peripheral
    if w/in 2 cm costal margin
  • Benign calcifications
  • Shape (round, non-round)
  • Edge (smooth, non-smooth)

24
ELCAP Benign Nodule
  • Benign calcifications
  • Smooth edges
  • lt 20 mm size

25
Guideline for Diagnostic Intervention ELCAP
  • Non-benign nodule on LD CT goes to diagnostic CT
    w/ high resolution imaging of abnormalities. If
    not benign per above criteria
  • lt 5mm F/U high res CT 3 mo, 6 mo, 12 mo, 24 mo
    no growth over 3 yrsbenign
  • 6-10 mm bx, if not possible F/U per above
  • gt 11mm bx

26
(No Transcript)
27
Fleishner Recommendations do NOT apply to
patients
  • lt35 Y.O.A. with low risk of lung cancer
  • Who have fever/signs of infection

28
Fleishner Nodule CT Reassessment Recommendations
  • NONCONTRAST
  • THIN COLLIMATION
  • LIMITED COVERAGE-JUST REGION OF INTEREST
  • LOW DOSE

29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
Nodule Enhancement and metabolism
  • Cancer/Infection/inflammation- CT
  • neovascularity- malignant nodules enhance gt 20
    Hounsfield Units (HU), benign lt 15 HU
  • Cancer/Infection/inflammation- increased glucose
    turnover- PET- SUVmax lt 2.5 benign
  • PET/CT HAS SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY CLOSE TO
    90 FOR NODULES 10 MM OR GREATER DIAMETER

32
PET/CT vs. Helical dynamic CT for SPN
  • PET/CT
  • MORE SENSITIVE (96 vs. 81) and MORE ACCURATE
    (93 vs. 85) than helical dynamic CT

33
Caveats for PET/CTNO STANDARIZATION FROM ONE
MACHINE TO ANOTHER AND POOR STANDARDIZATION OFTEN
BETWEEN EXAMINATIONS ON THE SAME
MACHINE.EXPERIENCE OF TECHNOLOGISTS-RADIOLOGISTS
VARIES WIDELY
34
Benign? NM in Lung Cancer
35
Role of PET in Lung Cancer
  • Improves staging by ruling out
    mediastinal/distant disease
  • Useful in evaluating response to therapy
  • Useful in early detection recurrent disease
  • Rad Clinics N.A. May 2000 p. 523

36
False Positive and Caveats PET/CT
  • Active necrotizing granulomas and some chronic
    inflammatory conditions are
  • ANY PROCESS THAT HAS INCREASED UPTAKE OF GLUCOSE
    IS PET POSITIVE

37
What to do with Indeterminant CT W/U of SPN
  • Serial radiographic F/U?
  • CT alone to decide to surgerize or not?
  • PET/CT
  • Surgery for pts w/ or indeterminant CT?

38
Cost Effectiveness
  • Radiographic F/U cost effective when probability
    of malignancy is low (lt0.14)
  • CT alone F/U cost effective when probability of
    malignancy is high (.71 - .91)
  • Surgery alone is most cost effective when
    probability of malignancy is very high gt .90
  • Over greatest range of probability .14 - .71 CT
    and PET/CT cost effective
  • Rad Clinics N.A. May 2000 p. 521-522

39
PRINCIPLES OF IMAGING IN ONCOLOGY
  • Imaging justified only if results will change
    therapy with patient benefit
  • Where there is an issue get tissue-biopsy when
    imaging is inconclusive (imaging guided?)
  • Positive studies are more valuable/reliable than
    negative studies
  • The diagnostic plan should progress logically
    from least to most invasive studies
  • Accurate assessment of initial disease extent is
    vital to selecting and sequencing appropriate
    treatment

40
(No Transcript)
41
Staging lung cancer
  • Stage 1A-T1N0MO tumor lt 3cm with no positive
    nodes and no metastasis
  • Stage 1B-T2N0M0- tumor gt 3cm, no nodes, no
    metastasis

42
RFA in Pulmonary Applications
43
Lung
  • 25 of patients are candidates for lung
    resection. 1
  • RT and chemotherapy together have a combined 5
    year survival rate of 5. 1
  • RF ablation can potentially provide direct
    cytoreduction, which could make RT and
    chemotherapy more effective. 1

1Dupuy, DE. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation
of pulmonary malignancies combined treatment
with brachytherapy. Am J Roentgenol.
2003181(3)711-5.
44
Lung Cancer
  • Assessment of malignancy has required invasive
    diagnostic methods
  • Needle biopsy (10 sampling error 15
    pneumothorax)
  • Bronchoscopy (low sensitivity occ. pneumothorax
  • Mediastinoscopy (surgical procedure limited to
    anterior mediastinum)
  • Thoracotomy (open surgery 1-3 mortality)
  • FDG-PET expensive and not widely available

45
Lung Cancer
The overall 5-year survival rate for all
stages combined is only 15. 1
Radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors may be a
promising option for nonsurgical candidates given
the suboptimal outcomes with current treatment
options. 1
  • 1Dupuy, DE. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation
    of pulmonary malignancies combined treatment
    with brachytherapy. Am J Roentgenol.
    2003181(3)711-5.

46
Radiofrequency AblationNSC Lung Cancer
18 mo S/P RFA/XRT
3 cm RFA
3 mo S/P RFA/XRT
47
KEYS
  • Excellent HP
  • Find Comparisons
  • Send the above to your radiologist then call and
    discuss the case-have the radiologist lay out the
    work up as local resources dictate what will be
    done
  • IF PATIENT CANDIDATE FOR TREATMENT TISSUE
    DIAGNOSIS IS NEEDED

48
We at Diagnostic Imaging Associates are happy to
help
  • FOR TULSA REFERRAL AREA CALL 918 599 5050/5094 TO
    TALK TO RADIOLOGIST
  • FOR OUTSIDE TULSA REFERRAL AREA CALL CHRISTA -918
    599 5031 and ask for radiologist at site nearest
    you
  • Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com