Valerie%20Whittlesey%20Increasing%20Student%20Learning%20of%20Diversity%20in%20Psychology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Title: Valerie%20Whittlesey%20Increasing%20Student%20Learning%20of%20Diversity%20in%20Psychology


1
Valerie WhittleseyIncreasing Student Learning of
Diversity in Psychology

• SEPA Meeting
• March, 2006

2
Outline

• Reasons for Teaching about Diversity Issues in
  Psychology
• Attitudes and Experiences of Psychology Faculty
  in Teaching about Diversity Recommendations
• Reviewing Diversity Research in Teaching of
  Psychology Recommendations
• Conclusion

3
Importance of Teaching about Diversity

• Allows students to be fair and equitable in their
  interactions with other people
• Helps prepare students for employment in an
  increasingly pluralistic society after college
• Makes psychology more relevant for all students

4
Importance of Teaching about Diversity

• May encourage students from all backgrounds to
  enter the psychology profession
• Will increase students knowledge of psychology
• Will enrich students emotional and personal
  development

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Teaching Diversity Experiences and
Recommendations of APA Division Two Members

• Jane Simoni, Kathy Sexton-Radek, Karen Yescavage,
  Harriette Richard, Alene Lundquist

12
Diversity Survey- Purpose

• Descriptive data on respondents, their
  institutions, and students
• Respondents attitudes toward teaching diversity
  issues
• Respondents recommendations for diversity
  resources

13
Teaching Diversity Survey

• Survey distributed to Division 2 members in 1995
• Survey sent to 2,108 members
• 703 members responded
• Return rate- 33

14
Diversity Survey- Demographics

• 14 Asst. Professor
• 23 Assoc. Professor
• 37 Full Professor
• 5 Emeritus

• 8 Teachers
• 6 Adjunct Instructors
• 1 Visiting Professors
• 6 Other Positions

15
Diversity Survey- Demographics

• 33 Liberal arts college
• 20 Community college
• 11 Technical institution

• 11 Research university
• 19 Comprehensive university
• 6 high school

16
Diversity Survey- Demographics

• 40- Less than 3,000 students
• 19- 3,000- 4,999 students
• 12- 5,000- 6,999 students

• 11- 7,000- 9,999 students
• 18- Greater than 10,000 students

17
Diversity Survey- Demographics

• 37 Suburban institution
• 32 Urban institution
• 29 Rural institution

18
Diversity Survey- Demographics

• 27 Midwest
• 21 Mid-Atlantic
• 21 South
• 9 West
• 7 New England

19
Diversity Survey- Demographics

• 80 White students
• 10 African American students
• 6 Hispanic students
• 3 Asian American students
• 1 Native American students

20
Diversity Studies- Demographics

• 62 Women
• 38 Men

21
Diversity Study- Multicultural Courses Taught

• 12 Psychology of Gender
• 2 Psychology of Minority Groups
• 2 Racism and Sexism in America
• 3 Women and Society
• 15 taught one of four multicultural courses

22
Diversity Survey- Importance of Diversity
Education in Courses

• 1 (not important)
• 5 (of major importance)
• Mean- 3.94
• SD- .86
• Between 3 (somewhat important) to 4 (important)

23
Diversity Survey- Time Allotted to Discussion of
Diversity

• 14- One class period
• 40- A couple of classes
• 20- A couple of weeks
• 13- Most of course

24
Diversity Survey- Issues of Diversity

• 89 Ethnicity and social class
• 77 Ageism
• 73 Appreciation of diversity

• 71 All sexual orientations
• 40 Cultural isms
• 12 Gender perspectives

25
Diversity Survey- Goals in Teaching Diversity
Issues

• 85 Heighten sensitivity and awareness
• 77 Broaden understanding of human condition
• 72 Tolerance

• 44 Enhance psychological mindedness
• 32 Expose personal perspectives
• 13 Political action
• 8 Other

26
Diversity Survey- Pedagogical Methods to Attain
Goals

• 69 Lectures discussions
• 57 Textbook readings
• 49 Field trips and discussions
• 39 Other

• 38 Guest speakers
• 37 Selected readings
• 35 Student Presentations
• 28 Videotape and discussions
• 25 Research papers

27
Diversity Survey-Barriers, Aids, and Successful
Strategies

• Three open-ended items about barriers,
  facilitating factors, and successful strategies
• Two raters content analysis of respones
• Interrater reliability (.90 to .94)

28
Diversity Survey- Barriers

• 27 Incorporating diversity issues into courses
  was not relevant
• 23 Time constraints

29
Diversity Survey- Barriers (cont)

• 25- No barriers
• Most barriers listed by less than 10 of
  respondents
• Student apprehension
• Lack of adequate resources
• College univ. curriculum

• Professor inadequacy
• Low department support
• Campus climate
• Heightened tension
• Community climate

30
Diversity Survey- Facilitating Factors

• 30 Resource rooms books
• 17 Workshops
• Less than 10
• College curriculum
• Videotapes
• Campus climate

• Community perception
• Student attitudes
• Parental attitudes

31
Diversity Survey- Successful Strategies

• 18 Discussion
• 14 Experiential activities
• 11 Cross-disciplinary approaches

• Less than 10
• Student presentations
• Campus-wide activities
• Media presentations
• Community activities
• Papers
• Journal articles

32
Teaching Diversity Experiences and
Recommendations of APA Division Two
MembersFollow-Up Study

• Loreto Prieto, Val Whittlesey, Diane Herbert,
  Carlota Ocampo, Allison Schomburg, and Dominicus
  So

33
Diversity Survey- Follow-Up Study

• Survey distributed to Division 2 members in 2000
• Survey sent to approximately 3,000 members
• 648 members responded
• Return rate- 22

34
Diversity Study-Follow-Up Study

• Although the return rate was lower than original
  study, the demographic institutional, campus, and
  course based characteristics of the 2000 sample
  match known population parameters of 2002 STP
  membership survey.
• Also, descriptive data on respondents, their
  institutions, and students similar to 1995 study.
• Results similar to 1995 study respondents
  attitudes toward teaching diversity issues and
  recommendations for diversity resources.

35
Diversity Survey- Follow-Up Issues of Diversity

• 94 Race/ethnicity
• 94 Sexual orientation
• 91 Sex/gender
• 86 Ageism
• 82 Social class

• 78 Physical disabilities
• 78 Religion
• 73 International
• 70 Mental/learning disabilities
• 66 Language differences

36
Diversity Survey-Follow-UpBarriers

• 57 Time constraints
• 36 Lack of perceived training/resources
• 21 Diversity issues are not relevant to course
  content

• 18 Student apprehension about dealing with
  diversity issues

37
Diversity Survey- Follow-Up Study

• For the follow-up study, faculty respondents were
  additionally asked four questions
• - their own personal level of acceptance toward
  diverse persons
• (broadly defined)
• - the level of importance they attached to
  incorporating diversity issues
• into their courses
• - their estimation of the level of
  importance their students attached to
• having diversity issues incorporated into
  courses
• - the level of acceptance they have felt
  from their students when
• diversity issues have been incorporated
  into courses

38
Diversity Survey-Follow-Up Study

• Each item was constructed on a 5-point Likert
  scale with Not accepting/not important and Very
  accepting/very important as polar anchors.

39
Diversity Survey- Follow-Up Study

• Faculty acceptance of diverse persons (mean
  4.7 sd .53).
• Faculty perceptions of the importance of
  incorporating diversity issues into their
  coursework (mean 4.2 sd .94).

• Faculty perceptions of the importance their
  students attach to having diversity issues
  incorporated into their courses (mean 3.4 sd
  .99).
• Faculty perceptions of the acceptance of students
  to incorporation of diversity issues into course
  work when instructors included it (mean 3.9 sd
  .82).

40
Diversity Survey-Recommendations of Both Studies

• Ensuring that more psychology faculty see the
  relevance of diversity issues in the psychology
  curriculum.
• Overcoming time constraints and lack of training
  and knowledge of diversity that faculty feel.

• Need to focus on all facets of diversity.
• Examining directly student attitudes of the
  importance they attach to incorporation of
  diversity into course work and their acceptance
  of this incorporation.

41
Review of Diversity Research in Teaching of
Psychology Summary Agenda

• Carlota Ocampo, Jane OConnor, Loreto Prieto, Val
  Whittlesey

42
Diversity Review

• David Johnsons database obtained from the
  webpage of the Office for Teaching Resources in
  Psychology
• www.lemoyne.edu/OTRP/index.html
• Used to identify TOP works published from 1974 to
  1999
• Authors manually consulted TOP 2000 issues

43
Diversity Review- Diversity Categories

• Aging
• Disability
• Gender
• International
• Nontraditional students

• Race/ethnic
• Several diversity categories
• Sexual orientation
• Social class
• Religion

44
Diversity Review- Taxonomy of Methodologies

• Activities
• Articles
• Bibliographies
• Comments
• Course descriptions
• Demonstrations

• Empiricals
• Equipment
• Reviews
• Software
• Surveys
• Symposias
• Interviews

45
Diversity Review- Raters

• .91 Interrater agreement coefficient in
  determining which articles were diversity related
• .97 Interrrater agreement coefficient in
  determining the diversity category that the
  articles fit into
• .90 Interrater agreement coefficient in
  determining the methodology for the diversity
  studies

46
Diversity Review- and of TOP Diversity Studies
Total Studies Published 1974-2000 N 1,860 Total of Studies Published 1974-1987 N 994 Total of Studies Published 1988-2000 N 866
Diversity Studies 1974-2000 N 136 7.31 Diversity Studies 1974-1987 N 46 4.63 Diversity Studies 1988-2000 N 90 10.39
47
Diversity Review- Diversity Categories of Studies

• 35 Gender
• 17 International
• 13 Aging
• 12 Several categories
• 10 Race/ethnicity

• 10 Sexual orientation
• 3 Nontraditional students
• 0 Social class
• 0 Disability
• 0 Religion

48
Diversity Review- Methodologies of Diversity
Studies

• 30 Articles
• 25 Courses
• 19 Activities
• 10 Empiricals
• 5 Comments
• 4 Surveys

• 3 Demos
• 2 Interviews
• 1 Software
• 0 Bibliographies
• 0 Equipment
• 0 Reviews
• 0 Symposias

49
Diversity Review- Frequent Diversity Methodologies

• International articles- N 12
• Gender courses- N 11
• Gender empirical studies- N 10
• Gender classroom activities- N 9

• Gender articles- N 8
• Several diversity category articles- N 7
• Aging classroom activities- N 7
• Racial/ethnic courses- N 6

50
Diversity Review-

• The 70 works in the previous slide represent 50
  of all diversity studies published in TOP between
  1974 to 2000
• Publications concerning gender issues constitute
  38 or 28 of total diversity works

51
Diversity Review

• 28 diversity empirical works represented 1.5 of
  all published works in TOP and 21 of diversity
  studies published in TOP from 1974-2000
• Eight (28.5) of empirical diversity articles
  during the earlier period
• 20 (71.4) of empirical diversity articles during
  the latter period

52
Diversity Review- Empirical Diversity Studies

• Gender (17 61)
• Sexual orientation (414)
• Aging (311)

• General diversity (311)
• International (13.5)

53
Diversity Review- Empirical Diversity Studies

• One-third of studies exploratory in nature
• Gender based issues offered more information
  regarding previous findings or theory related to
  study in question

54
Diversity Review- Recommendations

• Increase amount and programmatic focus of
  diversity research
• Increase theory driven empirical research using
  experimental design
• Continued attention to differential impact of
  teaching curriculum, materials, and methods on
  diversity

55
Diversity Review- Recommendations (cont)

• Increased use on development of instruments to
  measure diversity teaching goals
• Increased examination of underexamined groups
• Increased knowledge about psychology and its
  ability to address diversity issues
• Increased understanding of and support of diverse
  psychology professoriate

56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)