Title: Scripting collaboration with ManyScripts http:manyscripts'epfl'ch
1Scripting collaboration with ManyScripts
http//manyscripts.epfl.ch/
- Patrick.Jermann_at_epfl.ch
2A script defines a distributed cognitive
system.Learning results from compensating the
drawbacks of task distribution
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5META
Regulation
TASK
6Arguemntation
Againts
PRO
7Part B
Explanation
Part A
8CSCL Scripts
Outside
Class
Team
Solo
- Examples
- Jigsaw script (Aronson, 1978)
- explaining to each other
- Conflict (Doise , Mugny Perret-Clermont , 1975
) - arguing with each other
- Reciprocal script (Palincsar Brown, 1984)
- questioning each other
e.g. Dillenbourg Jermann, 2007
9Taking risks
- http//manyscripts.epfl.ch/
- Login using AAI login
- Bug if your name has accents
- Signup to a group
- Group students_domain_24
- Code 6497860
10Doing the argue graph
- Shorter time than usual
- Just to illustrate the concept
- Phases
- Phase 1 individual questions
- Phase 2 group formation
- Phase 3 pair questions
- Phase 4 debriebing
11Strong support
Interdependence
Independence
Weak support
12Question 1
- When assigning grades to a group of learners is
it better to - Assign the same grade to all members of the group
- Assign grades depending on individual performance
- Do not assign grades
13Q1 distribution of grades (reward)
- STAD (Student Teams-Achievement Divisions) and
TGT (Team-Games-Tournament) - Positive reward interdependence (team score)
- Heterogeneous groups of 4
- Participation problems
- Free-riding sucker effect some members do not
do their share - Providing incentives for contributing
- Combination of individual scores and team scores
- Making contributions indispensable
- Distributing expertise and/or information, making
the task difficult - Decreasing the cost of contributions
- Reviews on participation Geen, 1991Aiello
Douhitt, 2001 - See reviews by Slavin, 1995 Johnson, Johnson
Stanne, 2000
14Competition
Collaboration
Negative Interdependence
Cooperation
Positive Interdependence
Independence
Students have opposed goals I can achieve my
goal only if the others cannot achieve their
goal
15Question
- A team has to learn the laws of gravitation by
solving a problem. Is it better to - Give the same resources to all participants (e.g.
calculator, formulaire mathématique, weights,
springs, scale) - Give each individual a different set of resources
16Question
- When students work in a team of 4 (e.g. to write
a common text) it is best when - They split the task and work independently on
parts of the text - They work in groups of 2 on small parts of the
text. - They adopt roles (editor, writer, spell checker,
etc.)
17Distribution of resources
- Vertical division of labor
- Group Investigation (Sharan Sharan, 1992)
Jigsaw (Aronson, 1978) - Students work on subsets of the domain
- Motivation through Unicity of contributions
- Horizontal division of labor
- Reciprocal teaching (Brown and Palincsar, 1989)
- Roles (expert novice tutor tutee etc.)
18Flexibility
Collaboration
Interdependence
Independence
Cooperation
Division of Labor
19Question
- A team of students uses a simulation. What kind
of online help is most profitable ? - The computer helps the group to decide what to do
next (e.g. vary parameter x, change the scale of
the output, etc.) - The computer provides a glossary of related
formulae from the help menu. - The computer keeps track of past trials and
allows students to jump back to a previous
situation.
20What should be distributed ?
- Computer as an external memory allows to off-load
the learners - Computer as a metacognitive regulator
- ceding the executive function to the
surround is often one of the most powerful moves
we can make (Perkins, 1993, p. 97). - It is not the computer that should be doing the
diagnosing, the goal-setting, and the planning.
It is the student. (Scardamalia et al. 1989) - mixed forms of regulation (Broekarts (1999)
- higher-order thinking should not be taken over
(Perkins, 1993)
21Types of support
- Structuring
- Semi-structured interfaces
- Scripts
- Regulating
- Awareness tools
- Metacognitive tools
- Guides
22Strong support
ITS
CSCL Collaboration
Interdependence
Independence
CSCWCooperation
Groupware
Weak support
23Over-scripting
Strong support
Interdependence
Independence
Weak support
Unpredictable results
24- Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL)
?
- Initial conditions
- Group composition
- Physical and temporal context
- Task characteristics
- Tool features
- Outcomes
- Learning
- Performance
Dillenbourg al., 1999
25Debriefing
Graph
TheArgue Graph Script
Duo questionnaire
Solo questionnaire
Synthesis
26Debriefing
Graph
TheArgue Graph Script
Duo questionnaire
Solo questionnaire
Synthesis
Conflict
27Debriefing
Graph
TheArgue Graph Script
Duo questionnaire
Solo questionnaire
Synthesis
Conflict
28Debriefing
Graph
TheArgue Graph Script
Duo questionnaire
Solo questionnaire
Synthesis
Theories Behavioursim Constructivism Metacognition
Design choices Immediate FB Delayed FB Microworld
FB
29Debriefing
Graph
TheArgue Graph Script
Duo questionnaire
Solo questionnaire
Synthesis
30Argue Graph Social Planes
Social
Group
Individual
31The Concept Grid Script
Group Formation
Debriefing
Role Selection
Grid Construction
Writing Definitions
Readings
http//manyscripts.epfl.ch
32The Concept Grid Script
Group Formation
Debriefing
Role Selection
Grid Construction
Writing Definitions
Readings
http//manyscripts.epfl.ch
33The Concept Grid Script
Group Formation
Debriefing
Role Selection
Grid Construction
Writing Definitions
Readings
http//manyscripts.epfl.ch
34The Concept Grid Script
Group Formation
Debriefing
Role Selection
Grid Construction
Writing Definitions
Readings
http//manyscripts.epfl.ch
35The Concept Grid Script
Group Formation
Debriefing
Role Selection
Grid Construction
Writing Definitions
Readings
Mettre un sldie ou ils ident la grille relation
http//manyscripts.epfl.ch
36The Concept Grid Script
Group Formation
Debriefing
Role Selection
Grid Construction
Writing Definitions
Readings
http//manyscripts.epfl.ch
37- Script
- sequence of activities
- dataflow
- one core learning mechanism
- Integrated
- distance face2face
- with/out computers
- different social planes
- Debriefing
- Distilling students productions into
theoretical concepts - Orchestrating
- Timing matters
- Flexibility
- Orchestration
- Pedagogical, spatial and temporal articulation of
individual, collaborative and class activities