Modeling species distribution using speciesenvironment relationships - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Modeling species distribution using speciesenvironment relationships

Description:

Models developed at regional scale for the large Italian carnivores and major ungulate species ... population densities, ungulates distributions, protected ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: fabio7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modeling species distribution using speciesenvironment relationships


1
Modeling species distribution using
species-environment relationships
  • Fabio Corsi

Istituto di Ecologia Applicata Via L.Spallanzani,
32 00161 Rome ITALY email iea_at_mclink.it
2
Conservation Needs
  • Broad scale planning (eventually global)
  • Metapopulation approach
  • Identification of core areas and corridors
  • .
  • Which imply
  • Detailed knowledge on actual species distribution
  • Extensive data on species ecology and biology
  • Spatially explicit predicting tools

3
The information space
  • data are
  • fragmented
  • localised
  • on average, of modest quality

Can we use them for broad scale planning?
4
The answer is a set of new questions
  • Can we extrapolate existing knowledge to the
    entire continent?
  • Under which assumptions?
  • For which use?

5
Can we extrapolate existing knowledge to the
entire continent?
  • Yes, using modeling techniques which
  • enable to extrapolate from limited data new
    information
  • are cost effective
  • produce updateable distributions
  • define a repeatable approach

6
Spatial Modeling
Geographic space
Geographic space
Environmental space
En
En
E2
E2
E1
E1
E1
En
E2
Feedback
7
Under which assumptions?
  • Species distribution is influenced by available
    environmental data (e.g. test for randomness of
    point data Mantel test)
  • Local variations of these relationships
    throughout the study area can be neglected (e.g.
    stratification)
  • Available data are sufficient to define
    species-environment relationships (field
    validation, sensitivity analysis, hope and fate ?)

8
Alternatives
Interpolation
Quantitative data
Distribution
Semivariogram structure
Feedback
9
For which use?
  • Application of results include, but are not
    limited to
  • Identify potential/critical corridors
  • Predict areas of major conflicts
  • Assessment of conservation scenarios and
    management options on a cost/benefit basis
    (zoning system)
  • Include spatial elements in a PHVA
  • ..

10
Blotch distribution
  • The polygon defining the distribution range of
    the species as interpreted by the specialist
    based on her/his knowledge
  • The environmental requirements of the species are
    synthesized directly into the drawing itself

11
Deterministic overlay
  • The analysis of the environmental space is
    synthesized by the expert knowledge (deductive
    approach based on known ecological preferences)
  • Simple overlay of environmental variables layers
  • The goal is to describe the distribution within
    the blotch perimeter, showing the areas of
    expected occurrence.
  • Mostly categorical models of suitability

12
Statistical overlay
  • Formal analysis of the environmental space
    defined by the available variables
  • Result of previous analysis control the overlay
    process.
  • The goal is to describe the variation of
    suitability within the blotch
  • Continuous suitability rank surface

13
Examples
  • Models developed at regional scale for the large
    Italian carnivores and major ungulate species
  • Available data
  • Extent of Occurrence of each species
  • known territories and point locations from
    previous studies (e.g. radio tracking, direct
    investigations etc.)
  • land cover maps, digital terrain model,
    population densities, ungulates distributions,
    protected areas, sheep and goats densities

14
The method (step 1)
  • Environmental data pre-processed with map algebra
    to account for individuals awareness of the
    environment

15
The method (step 1)
  • Surface of the circular window is equal to the
    average size of the territories and/or home range
  • To each cell of the study area is assigned a
    value which is a function of the surrounding
    cells

16
Building the model (Step 2)
  • Environmental characterisation of known species
    locations based on available environmental
    variables

L1
L1 L2 L3 ...Ln
L3
Ln
Locations
E11 E12 E13 E1n
L2
E21 E22 E23 E2n
En1 En2 En3 Enn

E1 E2 En
Environmental variables
17
Building the model (Step 2)
  • Calculating the species ecological signature

E1
S E1 / n E1 S E2 / n E2 ... S En / n En
L1 L2 L3 Ln
E11 E12 E13 E1n
E21 E22 E23 E2n
En1 En2 En3 Enn
En
E2
18
Building the model (Step 3)
  • Calculating the distance of each portion of the
    study area from the ecological signature in the
    environmental variables space

E1
Px
Px E1x E2x ... Enx
Ecological Distance
E1x
E2x
Enx
En
E2
19
The method (Step 3)
  • Species ecological signature calculated as the
    vector of means and the variance-covariance matrix

S Variance-covariance matrix
m Vector of means
L1 L2 L3. Ln
E11 E12 E13 E1n
E1 E2 ... En
E21 E22 E23 E2n

En1 En2 En3 Enn
20
The method (Step 3)
  • Using the above definition of ecological
    signature, distances can be calculated using the
    Mahalanobis Distance

D Mahalanobis distance (environmental distance)
at point x x vector of environmental
variables measured in x m vector of the means S
variance-covariance matrix
21
Mahalanobis distance
  • takes into account not only the average value but
    also its variance and the covariance of the
    variables measured
  • accounts for ranges of acceptability (variance)
    of the measured variables
  • compensates for interactions (covariance) between
    variables
  • dimensionless
  • if the variables are normally distributed, can be
    readily converted to probabilities using the ?2
    density function

22
Map production
  • The mean (m) and standard deviation (s) of the
    Ecological Distance is calculated for the
    territories and locations
  • The Ecological Distance surface is partitioned
    according to the following threshold
  • m, m 1s ,m 2s, m 4s, m 8s, m 16s
  • First three classes account for more than 95 of
    variability (assuming a normal distribution)

23
The Extent of Occurrence
  • Accounts for variables that influence the species
    distribution but cannot easily be included in the
    analysis, such as
  • historical constraints
  • behavioural patters
  • Mapped results are interpreted as expected within
    the EO and potential outside the EO

24
Results
  • Environmental suitability model for the Wolf

25
Results
  • Cumulative frequency distributions

log-normal distribution of dead wolves
environmental distance classes in the study area
26
Results
  • Environmental suitability model for the Lynx

27
Results
  • Environmental suitability model for the Lynx
  • (boarder between France, Switzerland and Italy)

28
Results
  • Environmental suitability model for the Bear

29
Results
  • Environmental suitability model for the Deer

30
Towards a model for biodiversity
  • Biodiversity distribution models may derive from
  • deterministic overlay of suitability models
  • the analysis of the environmental suitability
    space

Species 1
Classification
Clustering
Species n

Species 2
31
Classification
  • Map showing the result of the principal component
    analysis on the suitability maps of the 3 species
    of large carnivores in the Alps

32
Alternatives
Interpolation
Quantitative data
Distribution
Semivariogram structure
Feedback
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com