Project Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Project Management

Description:

Channel of communications costs about 2 hours per week. Optimal number 3-7 ... Introduced by Michael Fagin in 76 (IBM Systems Journal) Formalized process ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: dianepo
Learn more at: http://wwwx.cs.unc.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Project Management


1
Project Management
  • Organization
  • Scheduling
  • 31 January

2
ORGANIZATION
  • Project management

3
Organization
  • Needed to control communications cost
  • Channel of communications costs about 2 hours per
    week
  • Optimal number 3-7
  • Organization structures
  • Hierarchical
  • Peer
  • Requires leader of team or aspects
  • Subteam
  • Requires gatekeeper
  • Matrix

4
What can you tell from an organization?
  • The formal structure
  • NOT the informal working mode

5
SCHEDULING
  • Project management

6
How to Build a Schedule
  • Identify the component parts
  • Identify the dependencies
  • Estimate
  • Really just another word for guess
  • Prefer educated guess
  • Lay out assignments and time frames

7
Project Plan for this project
  • Use simple Excel spreadsheet (or equivalent)

8
What you should be able to tell from your project
plan
  • What is Joe working on this week?
  • Who can help me if I run into trouble?
  • If I have to choose an activity to be late, which
    one will impact the project more?

9
Tools to Help
  • Product description
  • Clear statement of what you are building
  • Work breakdown
  • Product flow
  • PERT charts
  • Program Evaluation and Review Technique
  • Gantt charts

10
Work Breakdown Structure
  • Need to break down the tasks into component parts
    and tasks
  • Level of detail important
  • Lacks any time component

11
Work Breakdown
12
Graphical WBS
13
Product Flow
  • Identify sequences and dependencies
  • Distinguish new from existing components

14
Product Flow
15
PERT Charts
  • Critical path analysis or method
  • Program Evaluation and Review Technique
  • Also known as activity networks
  • Developed by Navy in 1958
  • Three stages
  • Planning (tasks and sequence)
  • Scheduling (start and finish times)
  • Analysis (float and revisions)
  • Two different models
  • Activities are nodes (most common) or arcs

16
Pert Chart Activity Box
17
Pert Charts
18
CPM Critical Path Method
  • Alternative to PERT
  • Dupont 1957
  • Graphical view of project
  • Predicts time required to complete
  • Shows which activities are critical to
    maintaining the schedule

19
Planning PERT and CPM
  • Identify the specific activities and milestones.
  • Determine the proper sequence of the activities.
  • Construct a network diagram.
  • Estimate the time required for each activity.
  • Determine the critical path.
  • Update the PERT chart as the project progresses.
  • Specify the individual activities.
  • Determine the sequence of those activities.
  • Draw a network diagram.
  • Estimate the completion time for each activity.
  • Identify the critical path (longest path through
    the network)
  • Update the CPM diagram as the project progresses.

20
Gantt Charts
  • Milestone charts
  • Invented by Harvey Gantt in 1916
  • Advantages
  • Less detailed
  • Amenable to management overlays

21
Gantt Chart
22
Gantt Chart with Overlays
23
Scheduling Steps and Tools
  • Put together minimal solution
  • Primary requirements
  • Start with external commitments
  • Product descriptions
  • Milestones (contract)
  • Introduce internal milestones
  • Work breakdown structure
  • Product Flow
  • PERT Chart, Gantt chart
  • Focus on the risks
  • Risks (contract)
  • Add next level of features where possible
  • Secondary requirements

24
Software Sources
  • Open source tools
  • dmoz.org/Computers/Software/Project_Management/Ope
    n_Source/

25
Reviews and Inspections
26
Reviews and Inspections
  • Why?
  • Developer cant correct unseen errors
  • More eyes to catch problems
  • Earlier is cheaper
  • Integration fix typically 3-10 times the cost at
    design
  • Difference in terms
  • Review implies completed work, often reviewed by
    someone at a different level
  • Inspection implies peer review of work in progress

27
Inspections
  • Introduced by Michael Fagin in 76 (IBM Systems
    Journal)
  • Formalized process
  • Specific roles and steps
  • Heavy preparation and follow-up
  • Used for documents and code

28
Will you review or inspect?What will you review
or inspect?How will you review or inspect?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com