SPEECH ACTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

SPEECH ACTS

Description:

Sentence must be positive, not negative. Sentence must be ... the defense stamps his staff on the floor, and proclaims in Latin 'Hora est.' ( Time is up! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:161
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: publi5
Category:
Tags: acts | speech | hora

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SPEECH ACTS


1
SPEECH ACTS
  • by Don L. F. Nilsen

2
CONDITIONS ON PERFORMATIVES
  • Subject must be 1st person.
  • Verb must be active.
  • Verb must be non-durative.
  • Adverb must be hereby.
  • Sentence must be positive, not negative.
  • Sentence must be Imperative or Declarative.
  • Verb must perform the act.
  • Must meet felicity conditions (authority, etc.)
  • Must meet sincerity conditions (not a joke, etc.)
  • Can be larger than a sentence (e.g. The
    Declaration of Independence)
  • (Mey 107ff)

3
CONTEXT OF SPEECH ACTS
  • There is a policeman at the corner.
  • This could be a warning, an assurance, a dare, a
    hint, or a reminder to go and take your car out
    of the handicapped space you are parked in.

4
  • I promise Ill be there tomorrow.
  • This could be a threat or a promise, depending on
    whether his presence tomorrow is a disadvantage
    or an advantage to the listener. Contrast the
    sentence above with
  • If you dont behave, I promise you theres going
    to be trouble. This sentence says its a
    promise, but its a threat.
  • (Searle Speech Acts 58)

5
  • When he was campaigning, Clinton said he would
    not turn away any Haitian refugees.
  • When he became President, Clinton turned away
    Haitian refugees.
  • Clinton said that the conditions had changed.
  • Based on this, Daniel Schorr on National Public
    Radio said, Campaigning is not the same as
    governing, because the conditions are not the
    same.
  • (Mey 127)

6
FELICITY CONDITIONS
  • Authority
  • Person
  • Place
  • Time
  • Manner
  • Sincerity
  • Verbal Sincerity
  • Intonational Sincerity
  • Behavioral Sincerity

7
INDIRECT SPEECH ACTS
  • Could you move over a bit?
  • Yes (without moving is inappropriate)
  • Moving (without Yes is appropriate)
  • NOTE Could you move over a bit is a
    precondition to the actual speech act, Move
    over.
  • (Mey 111)

8
  • Do you know what time it is?
  • Do you have the correct time?
  • Can you tell me how to get to the mens room?
  • Do you see the salt anywhere?
  • Its cold in here.
  • Isnt this soup rather bland?
  • Why cant you shut up?
  • NOTE These are preconditions
  • (Mey 126-127, 135)

9
  • I strongly suggest you shut your mouth.
  • Sometimes its a good idea to shut up.
  • I wonder if you really should do all that
    talking.
  • I wouldnt say more, if I were you.
  • Remember the proverb, Speech is silver.?
  • How about if you just shut up?
  • (Mey 136)

10
  • DURING A JOB INTERVIEW
  • Would you like to tell us, Mr. Khan, why youve
    applied to Middleton College?
  • This is known as fishing for compliments.
  • (Mey 213)

11
IRONIC SPEECH ACTS
  • I promise not to keep this promise.
  • Do not read this sign.
  • You did a great job, and Im not being polite.
  • (Mey 129, 177)
  • George Lakoff wrote a book entitled, Dont Think
    of an Elephant.

12
LUMPERS AND SPLITTERS
  • Splitters feel that there are many different
    types of speech acts. Verschueren says that some
    splitters have as many as five hundred or six
    hundred different types of speech acts.
  • (Verschueren 10)
  • Searle is a lumper. He has only five classes of
    Speech Acts Representatives, Directives,
    Commissives, Expressives and Declarations.
  • (Searle 1979)
  • We could lump all of these into a single class
    Performatives.

13
MARKEDNESS OF SPEECH ACTS
  • I beg your excellency to please accept these keys
    to the city as a token of our humble submission
    to your excellency (to commander of enemy troops
    who have captured a city)
  • I (hereby) promise to set fire to your house.
  • I (hereby) warn you that you will be awarded the
    Nobel Prize.
  • I (hereby) warn you that your lawn will turn
    brown in November.
  • Under penalty of law, do not remove this tag.
  • (Mey 130-131)

14
SILENCE AS A SPEECH ACT
  • In Mexico in the old days, the Federales would
    pull a person over and ask to see their drivers
    license.
  • Before handing over the drivers license the
    driver would attach a 20 bill onto the back of
    the license.
  • Nothing was said by either party. Was this,
    therefore, a bribe, or not?
  • (Mey 211)

15
  • MOTHER (Calling out the window to child in yard)
    Joshua, what are you doing?
  • JOSHUA Nothing
  • MOTHER WILL YOU STOP IT IMMEDIATELY!

16
  • What I like best is doing nothing. Its when
    people call out at you just as youre going off
    to do it. What are you going to do, Christopher
    Robin? and you say, Oh, nothing, and then you
    go and do it.
  • (Milne, The House on Pooh Corner Chapter 10)

17
  • STUDENT I was going to talk to you about my
    term paper, if its all right.
  • PROFESSOR SILENCE
  • STUDENT When do you think youll have it marked
    then?
  • PROFESSOR Miriam, I hope you brought the book.
  • MIRIAM SILENCE
  • PROFESSOR Okay, but please remember it next
    time.
  • (Blum-Kulka 176)

18
SPEECH ACT FORCE
  • Locutionary Force (what is said)
  • Illocutionary Force (what is done)
  • Perlocutionary Force (the effect)

19
TYPES OF SPEECH ACTS 1
  • Commissives (Affect Speaker, Subjective)
  • TYPES Oath, Offer, Promise
  • Declaratives (Change the Macrocosmic Social
    World)
  • TYPES Baptism, Marriage
  • Directives (Change the Microcosmic Social World)
  • TYPES Command, Request
  • Expressives (Feelings of Speaker)
  • TYPES Apology, Thanks
  • (Mey 120, Searle 1977, 34)

20
TYPES OF SPEECH ACTS 2
  • Interrogatives (Hearer Knows Best)
  • TYPES Closed (yes-no), Loaded, Open
  • Imperatives (Directives) (Affect Hearer)
  • TYPES Request, Requirement, Threat, Warning
  • Performatives (Affect world)
  • TYPES Agreement, Appointment, Baptism,
    Declaration of Independence, Dedication, Marriage
  • Representatives (Objective Descriptive
    Statements)
  • TYPES Statement that is either True or False

21
UPTAKE
  • Some speech acts like betting and thanking need
    an uptake from the listener. Consider the
    following
  • BAR-LEV Sir, I want to thank you for your
    cooperation and I want to thank you very much.
  • IDI AMIN You know I did not succeed.

22
  • !BAR-LEV I have been requested by a friend with
    good connections in the government to thank you
    for your cooperation. I dont know what was
    meant by it, but I think you do know.
  • IDI AMIN I dont know because Ive only now
    returned hurriedly from Mauritius

23
!!CONTEXT OF BAR-LEV CONVERSATION WITH IDI AMIN
  • Bar-Lev is an Israeli colonel
  • Idi Amin is the President of Uganda
  • Israeli paratroopers have entered Uganda without
    permission
  • Idi Amin heard that this was planned and left for
    Mauritius
  • Therefore if Idi Amin accepts the thanks, it
    means he agrees with the paratrooper drop. Since
    he was not in the country, he cant be held
    responsible.
  • (Mey 282-283)

24
!!!CONCLUSION
  • The chief beadle In Dutch universities knows when
    doctoral defenses begin.
  • After the defense has been in progress for 45
    minutes, he ceremoniously enters the defense
    stamps his staff on the floor, and proclaims in
    Latin Hora est. (Time is up!).
  • (Verschueren 93)

25
  • References 1
  • Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words.
    Oxford, England Oxford University Press, 1962.
  • Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele
    Kasper eds. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics Requests
    and Apologies. Norwood, NJ Ablex, 1989.
  • Eschholz, Paul, Alfred Rosa, and Virginia Clark.
    Language Awareness. Bedford/St. Martins, 2009.
  • Mey, Jacob L., ed. Concise Encyclopedia of
    Pragmatics. Oxford, England Elsevier
    Science/Pergamon, 1998.
  • Mey, Jacob L. Pragmatics An Introduction, 2nd
    Edition. Oxford, England, 2001.

26
  • References 2
  • Mey, Jacob L. When Voices Clash A Study in
    Literary Pragmatics. Berlin, Germany Mouton de
    Gruyter, 1999.
  • Mey, Jacob L. Whose Language? A Study in
    Linguistic Pragmatics. Philadelphia, PA
    Benjamins, 1985.
  • Nilsen, Alleen Pace, and Don L. F. Nilsen.
    Encyclopedia of 20th Century American Humor.
    Westport, CT Greenwood, 2000.
  • Raskin, Victor. The Primer of Humor Research. New
    York, NY Mouton de Gruyter, 2008.
  • Schiffrin, Deborah. Approaches to Discourse.
    Cambridge, MA Blackwell, 1994, pp. 49-96.

27
  • References 3
  • Searle, John R. A Classification of Illocutionary
    Acts. In Proceedings of the Texas Conference on
    Performatives, Presuppositions, and Implicatures.
    Eds. Andy Rogers, Bob Wall and John P. Murphy,
    Washington, DC Center for Applied Linguistics,
    1977, 27-45.
  • Searle, John R. The Classification of
    Illocutionary Acts. Language in Society 8
    (1979) 137-151.
  • Searle, John R. "Indirect Speech Acts." Syntax
    and Semantics III Speech Acts. New York, NY
    Academic Press, 1975, 59-82.
  • Searle, John R. Speech Acts An Essay in the
    Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, England
    Cambridge University Press, 1969.
  • Verschueren, Jef. Understanding Pragmatics.
    London, England Arnold, 1999.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com