Title: International Air Transport Association
1International Air Transport Association
8.33 KHz Channel Spacing Status, Lessons
Learned and a Glimpse to the Future
by Steve ZerkowitzAssistant Director Operations
and Infrastructure - Europe
21. The Decision
- ICAO EUR RAN 1994 To address the VHF frequency
shortage, introduce 8.33 kHz channel spacing - ICAO COM OPS 1995
- EANPG 1995 gt EUROCONTROL
- In Upper Airspace Only
- In the Core Area of Europe Only
- Recognized as interim measure only
32. What was wrong with this decision?
- What is the definition of Upper Airspace?
- Core area only?
- If this is an interim measure only, what happens
afterwards? - Clearly, the intention was to save money, but
- Local solution with global impact
- Is history about to repeat itself in the US??
43. Deadlines and Delays
- Original deadline 1 January 1998
- First revised deadline 1 January 1999
- Second revised deadline 7 October 1999
- Successful implementation on 7 October 1999
54. Why delays?
- First delay timescale was simply too ambitious
- Second delay lack of consistent European rule
making and rule promulgation - Lack of equipment, delays in certification, late
ordering - Delays in spite of mandate
- Without a mandate, process would have stalled
65. Correcting the mistakes of the original
decision- 1
- Carriage of equipment in the whole of the ICAO
EUR Region, with exemptions where 8.33 was not
yet needed - Use ICAO definition of Upper Airspace (adjust
National procedures where needed) - Life beyond 8.33 still not addressed!
76. Correcting the mistakes of the original
decision- 2
- More recently.
- ENPRM
- EUROCONTROL High Level Communications Group
87. EUROCONTROL Project Management - 1
- Textbook example of best possible practice in a
very difficult environment - 8.33 PMC
- 8.33 Retrofit Group
- 8.33 Contact Persons Group
- Close contact with airspace users organizations
and other stake holders - Technical, safety and operational aspects all
addressed - Information promulgation traditional methods
plus 8.33 User Guide and web site
98. EUROCONTROL Project Management - 2
- Measuring the rate of equipage
- Direct and indirect methods
- CFMU role essential
- Procedures for keeping the 8.33 kHz airspace
clean of unequipped aircraft - Catching the cheaters firm approach
- Help from CFMU as good as they come. BUT!
- Other internal differences successfully overcome
109. Impact on the airspace users
- 10.000 aircraft equipped
- Is there a business case for 8.33 kHz?
- Quantifying benefits very difficult
- What do we get for this massive investment (/-
390m)?
1110. Spectrum benefits
- 39 new channels created due to 8.33 kHz
- 113 channels are now using 8.33 frequencies
- 74 of these already existed in 25 kHz
- opportunity for additional 40 channels
- Less time effort to allocate new channels
- overlaps in 25 kHz environment meant that new
channels only supported by shifting - ICAO FMG unable to satisfy demand prior to 8.33
- 25 kHz spectrum freed
1211. Operational benefits
- 8.33 kHz is an enabler for timely operational
improvements - Re-sectorization France, Germany, Switzerland,
Maastricht - Airspace reorganisation in support of RVSM
other initiatives - Spare frequencies to overcome interference
France - Lower airspace services (supported by freed 25
kHz spectrum)
1312. Issues remaining (but being addressed)
- States must act on frequency management requests
- 25 to 8.33 conversion is not always
straightforward (carrier offset/levels/coupling,
etc) - New channel is of no use if there is a lack of
controllers - Radio control panel (6 digits)
- Phraseology
- More transparency is needed of how new channels
are being used
1413. The Future - 1
- Horizontal Expansion
- 8.33 kHz channel-spacing horizontal expansion
requires the co-ordinated removal of exemptions
from 21 States on 31 October 2002. - 8.33 kHz will be progressively implemented after
31 October 2002 - Enables homogeneous area of operations for
aircraft carriage - Introduction of 8.33 kHz in the OPC band?
15(No Transcript)
168.33 Expansion - Simulation Results
1714. The Future -2
- Vertical expansion?
- One more interim measure
- Additional aircraft population involved is very
large and diverse - Is it worth it?
- Time for a quantum leap?
- EUROCONTROLs Wide Band initiative
1815. The Future - 3
- We need a thick pipe between the ground and the
air, to exchange information - The cockpit is no longer the only place in the
aircraft that has to communicate - Combine and save?
1916. The Future - 4
- A possible way ahead
- Maximize the benefits from 8.33 horizontal
expansion and other means to ensure that we get
sufficient spectrum capacity until new technology
kicks in - Accelerate decision on, and development of, new
communications technology and implement as soon
as possible
2017. Quantum leap?
- Compare even the most modern VHF radio and the
method of communicating with it to the advances
made in the rest of the cockpit - QUANTUM LEAP OR JUST
CATCHING UP????