ASYMMETRICAL FORWARD SHOULDER POSTURE Evaluation and Treatment Considerations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 69
About This Presentation
Title:

ASYMMETRICAL FORWARD SHOULDER POSTURE Evaluation and Treatment Considerations

Description:

ASYMMETRICAL FORWARD SHOULDER POSTURE Evaluation and Treatment Considerations – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:575
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 70
Provided by: christo362
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ASYMMETRICAL FORWARD SHOULDER POSTURE Evaluation and Treatment Considerations


1
ASYMMETRICAL FORWARD SHOULDER POSTUREEvaluation
and Treatment Considerations
  • Christopher Johnson, MPT MCMT

2
Objectives
  • Closely examine the asymmetrical forward shoulder
    posture (AFSP)
  • Review musculoskeletal impairments associated
    with AFSP
  • Discuss research pertaining to the AFSP
  • Discuss evaluation strategies and become
    familiarized with interventions
  • How does this change the way we treat?

3
Bookhout Isaacs 2002
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
Scapular Position
Thoracic Kyphosis
Apleys Scatch
Levator Scapulae
AFS
Tyler Test
IR _at_ 90 Abd
Neuromuscular Re-education
Biceps Brachii
Pectoralis Minor
Posterior GH Mobility
8
Forward Shoulder Posture
  • Posture and alignment of body segments are
    effected by mm shortening and weakness
  • Upper quarter musculoskeletal dysfunction

Ayub 1991 Janda 1978 Penny et al. 1981 Travell
Simons 1984
9
Upper Crossed Syndrome (Janda)
  • Tight
  • Upper Traps
  • Levator Scap
  • SCM
  • Pectorals
  • Weak
  • Lower Traps
  • Middle Traps
  • Serratus Anter.
  • Rhomboids

10
Forward Shoulder Posture
  • Scapular abduction elevation
  • May also include
  • Scapular winging
  • Humeral IR
  • Kendall McCreary 1983
  • Diveta et al. 1990

11
Forward Shoulder Posture
  • Asymmetry rarely discussed!
  • Associated with predictable impairments

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Posterior Shoulder Tightness
  • Plays major role in controlling joint surface
    motion between humeral head and glenoid.
  • Effect of tight capsular structures on normal
    shoulder range of motion has been well
    documented.

Harryman et al. JBJS 1990 OBrien et al. AJSM
1990 Terry et al. AJSM 1991 Warner et al. AJSM
1992 Tyler et al. AJSM 2000
19
Posterior Shoulder Tightness
  • Oblique GH translations occur when the capsule is
    asymmetrically tight
  • Operative tightening of the posterior capsule
  • Increased anterior translation with flexion and
    cross body movement
  • Significant superior translation with GH flexion
  • Decreased shoulder rotational ROM

Harryman et al. JBJS 1990
20
Tests Measures
GH IR AROM
Forward Shoulder
Tyler Test
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Relationship Between Tyler Test Deficit and
Internal Rotation Deficit
29
Summary
  • Controls
  • Arm dominance associated with
  • FSP
  • Loss of IR ROM
  • Posterior shoulder tightness
  • Dominant Arm Involvement
  • Effects accentuated
  • Nondominant Arm Involvement
  • Effects absent

30
Association Btw Internal Rotation ROM and
Posterior Shoulder Tightness
Tyler et al 2000 Compared absolute numbers
31
Scapular Movement
  • 3 movements
  • Upward rotation
  • IR/ER
  • A-P tilt

Lukasiewicz et al JOSPT 1999
32
Kiblers Scapular Dysfunctions
TYPE 1
TYPE 2
TYPE 3
Kibler et al JSES 2002
33
(No Transcript)
34
  • Two group comparison
  • Compare scapular kinematics during arm elevation
    between individuals distinguished by pectoralis
    minor length
  • 50 subjects without shoulder pain

Borstad JD Ludewig PM JOSPT 2005
35
PMI Pectoralis Minor Index
PMI (Resting muscle length/Subject height) x 100
36
Sagittal Plane Elevation
37
Scapular Plane Elevation
38
Coronal Plane Elevation
39
  • Nonrandomized 2 group post test design
  • Five scapular kinematic variables assessed _at_ each
    arm position
  • Groups
  • 20 nonimpaired subjects
  • 17 patients with impingement

Lukasiewicz et al JOSPT 1999
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
Abnormal Scapular Position and Thoracic Kyphosis
  • Weakened scapular mm in association with thoracic
    kyphosis (Fu et al. CORR 1991)
  • Scapular protraction decreases the subacromial
    space (Solem-Bertoft et al CORR 1993)
  • No increased lateral scapular translation with
    kyphosis but increased anterior tilt (Collin et
    al. 1992 )

44
(No Transcript)
45
  • Random allocation of subjects into placebo
    controlled crossover study
  • Investigate effect of changing thoracic and
    scapular posture on shoulder flexion and scapular
    plane abduction ROM
  • 60 asymptomatic subjects and 60 with SA
    impingement

Lewis et al JOSPT 2005
46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
Biceps Brachii
49
Levator Scapulae
DOES TIGHTNESS LEAD TO INCREASED ANTERIOR TILT?
50
Evaluation Tx Considerations
  • Posture
  • ROM Muscle Length
  • Joint Integrity/Mobility
  • Myofascial Trigger Points
  • Neuromuscular Re-Education

51
Postural Position
  • Posterior View
  • Lateral View
  • Hands on Hips
  • Supine

52
Posterior View
53
Supine
54
Lateral View
55
ROM Muscle Length
Active IR
Passive IR _at_ 90
Tyler Test
56
Posterior GH Mobility
57
Pectoralis Minor/Biceps Stretch
58
Pre vs. Post Stretch
59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
(No Transcript)
62
(No Transcript)
63
Neuromuscular Re-ed
64
Neuromuscular Re-ed
65
Neuromuscular Re-ed
66
Neuromuscular Re-ed
67
Neuromuscular Re-ed
68
Summary
  • AFSP is common and typically associated with
    predictable impairments
  • Dominant arm affected to a greater extent
  • Requires thorough examination and treatment
  • Additional research is needed!
  • Esp in overhead athletes and various pathological
    states

69
Thanks
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com