The Chinese Room Argument - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

The Chinese Room Argument

Description:

Ned Block's 'Computer Model of the Mind' Online notes from James Pryor. Issue. Can computations be sufficient for thinking or other ... Searle's Rejoinder ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: joel92
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Chinese Room Argument


1
The ChineseRoom Argument
  • Joe Lau

2
Readings
  • Searle and Churchlands articles in Scientific
    American.
  • Ned Blocks Computer Model of the Mind
  • Online notes from James Pryor

3
Issue
  • Can computations be sufficient for thinking or
    other mental states?
  • Not to be confused with
  • Can machines think?
  • Can a computer simulate the mind?
  • Does the mind carry out computations?
  • Can computers think?

4
Against computational sufficiency
  • Bad argument
  • Current computers cannot do X.
  • So computations cannot be sufficient for X.
  • In-principle argument needed, e.g.
  • Mental state X requires Y.
  • No computational process can generate Y.
  • So computations are not sufficient for X.

5
The Chinese Room
hmmm what does that mean?
6
The argument (a reductio argument)
  • Suppose there is a program sufficient to produce
    understanding of Chinese.
  • A person in the Chinese room can in principle
    carry out this program.
  • But such a person would not understand Chinese.
  • So no program is by itself sufficient to produce
    understanding of Chinese.

7
Churchlands reply
  • The program cannot be carried out in the Chinese
    room.
  • The Chinese room implements only serial
    processing.
  • The brain carries out parallel processing.
  • Searle Change the Chinese room into the Chinese
    gym.

8
Another reply
  • The person does understand Chinese, but he is not
    conscious of his understanding.
  • Is this a good reply?

9
The system reply
  • The argument is not valid. (Conclusion does not
    follow from assumptions.)
  • The system as a whole understands Chinese even if
    the person does not.
  • The person is only the central processor of the
    whole system.

10
Searles Rejoinder
  • The person can internalize the whole system, by
    remembering all the rules, etc.
  • Now the person the system.
  • The person still does not understand Chinese.
  • So the system does not understand Chinese.

11
Evaluation
  • Why accept the person the system?
  • Searle There is nothing in the system that is
    not in the person
  • But this shows at most that the system is within
    the person, not identical with it.
  • Diagnosis
  • It is possible that the person carries out
    computations that produce Chinese understanding,
    but the person cannot access the knowledge.

12
Emulation screenshot MS windows on Linux
MS Windows
Linux
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com