Title: GATT WTO
1GATT / WTO
2GATT
- General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was
established in Geneva in 1947. - The objective was to create a framework that
would regulate international trade and stimulate
international commerce.
3Objectives of GATT
- The objectives of the 1947 Agreement were to
establish an orderly and transparent framework
within which barriers to trade could be gradually
reduced, and international trade thereby
expanded.
4Objectives of GATT
- The most important elements of the Agreement
included those of - non-discrimination the Most Favored Nation
(MFN) principle - reciprocity
- transparency
- tariff reduction.
5Exception and Waivers
- developing countries were given special status.
- countries that offer each other more favorable
treatment within a custom's union were allowed to
waive full adherence to the MFN clause. - agricultural trade was given special treatment,
especially with regard to non-tariff barriers.
6The GATT Negotiating Rounds
7Reasons For Exclusion of Agriculture from
Earlier Rounds of GATT
- The general consensus of opinion was that
agriculture was a unique sector of the economy,
that, for reasons of national food security,
could not be treated like other sectors. - With the expansion of the manufacturing economy,
agriculture was in relative decline. Political
and social pressures demanded, however, that the
decline be halted or slowed down, and that
agriculture be protected from the full rigors of
the international market.
8Special Treatment for Agricultural Trade
- Quantitative import restrictions, banned for all
other commodities, could be used in the case of
agricultural commodities - The use of agricultural export subsidies was
explicitly permitted - Other mechanisms for protecting agriculture, such
as variable import levies and domestic subsidies,
were not explicitly covered by the GATT, and
provided additional loopholes for agricultural
policy makers wishing to protect the agricultural
sector.
9The Latest GATT Round
- Uruguay Round
- Place Uruguay.
- Date 1986-93
- Doha Round just started in November 2001
10Uruguay Round
- The Uruguay round was launched at a meeting of
trade ministers in Punte del Este, Uruguay, in
October 1986. - It was expected to last for four to five years
and instead took around eight years (until
December 1993). - What made the Uruguay round so contentious?
11Reasons for inclusion of agriculture within the
GATT framework
- comparative advantage
- world market instability
- The effects of protectionism
12Agriculture in the Uruguay round negotiations
- The objectives with regard to agriculture were
described as follows To achieve greater
liberalization of trade in agriculture and bring
all measures affecting import access and export
competition under strengthened and more
operationally effective GATT rules and disciplines
13The Main Players in the Agricultural Negotiations
- The USA was enthusiastic about promoting greater
liberalization in agricultural trade, and was
keen to reduce the protection and support enjoyed
by producers in the EC under the CAP. - The EC was much less amenable to far reaching
- liberalization, but was keen to reach a workable
compromise, that could be enshrined in the GATT,
in order to minimize future trade friction
between itself and the USA. - The Cairns Group
14Other Players in the Agricultural Negotiations
- For the large group of developing countries
which were net importers of food, the main
concern was over the impact of the Round on the
cost of food imports. - Two other countries with a major interest in the
outcome of the round were Japan and the Republic
of Korea. These countries had highly protected
domestic rice markets, and a strong domestic
opposition to reform of the sector.
15Initial Positions of US in the Uruguay Round
- USA opened the negotiation with an unrealistic
demand for the zero-zero option. - All agricultural subsidies and all quantitative
restrictions on agricultural imports be phased
out over a period of ten years, and that world
health and safety measures be harmonized. - This proposal found support among Cairn groups
but the EC totally opposed it.
16Positions of Other Players
- The EC's demands focused primarily on the concept
of "rebalancing. - Japan, like the EC was keen to protect its
farmers from international competition. - The demands of developing countries were focused
on their need for special and differential
treatment within the negotiations.
17Slow Initial Progress in the Negotiations
- At the mid-term review in Montreal at the end of
1988, the negotiating parties in the agricultural
group were as far apart as ever. - In April 1989, U.S. negotiators dropped their
demand for zero-zero option. - In 1991, finally arrived at a consensus, whereby
countries agreed to make concessions in each of
the following three areas - import access
- domestic support
- export subsidies.
18Dunkel Draft Act
- At the end of 1991, the director-general of the
GATT presented a comprehensive Draft Final Act,
known as the Dunkel Draft. - It included the first complete text on
agriculture, in which quantitative proposals were
presented with respect to concessions in each of
the three major disciplines
19The Blair House Accord
- the 24 percent cut in the volume of subsidized
exports that was originally proposed, was reduced
to 21 percent. - direct payments made under production limiting
programs, such as those made under the EC's CAP
reform, and the USA's policy of deficiency
payments and land set-aside, were made exempt
from domestic support reduction commitments - commitments to reduce domestic support on a
product by product basis were replaced by a
commitment to reduce overall support to the
agricultural sector.
20Major Areas of GATT Disciplines
Market Access
Domestic Support
Export Subsidies
21Market Access Commitments
- Tariffication, Tariff Binding and Reduction.
- Non Tariff Barriers to be converted to Tariff
Equivalent. - All Tariffs to be bound.
- Reduce existing and new tariffs by 36 percent, on
a simple average basis, in equal installments in
six years. - Reduce tariffs for each commodity by a minimum of
15 percent .
22Market Access (cont.)
- Minimum and Current Access Commitment
- Minimum access import opportunities to be
provided for products with import below 5 percent
of domestic consumption - Increase minimum access quotas from 3 percent of
domestic consumption to 5 percent over the
implementation period.
23Japanese Minimum Access Commitment for Rice
24Domestic Support Commitments
Amber Box Policies
Blue Box Policies
Green Box Policies
Largest effect on production and trade
Least effect on production and trade
Compromise between these two
25AMS Support Level for 24 Countries (1986-88 vs
1995)
26Export Subsidies Commitment
- Under GATT agreement, both United States and the
European Union agreed to reduce the quantity and
budgetary outlay ceilings for subsidized exports
wheat, durum, wheat flour and semolina by 21
percent and 36 percent respectively. - The final year (2000) commitments are the
required 21 and 36 below the 1986-90 base for
the quantitative and budgetary commitments,
respectively
27U.S. GATT Commitments on Subsidized Exports
28EU GATT Commitments for Subsidized Exports
- The European Union will reduce the quantity and
budgetary outlay for export subsidies from the
current level. In the year 2000, the EU's maximum
allowable quantity of subsidized wheat and wheat
flour exports will be 13.4 MMT, 6.8 MMT less than
the quantity of subsidized exports in 1991-92.
29Uruguay round GATT Negotiations vs Old GATT
- The old GATT was often criticized because it
lacked an enforcement mechanism - One of the most sustentative achievement of the
Uruguay round was the creation of a new
international institutions, the WTO. - The WTO is responsible for enforcing existing
international trade agreements and serve as a
host for new talks to liberalize trade.
30The WTO
- As of 1999, 135 countries had become members of
WTO. Another 30 countries are in the process of
applying for membership. - As of 1999, the WTO dispute settlement system had
been remarkably active and successful. - Between 1995 to 2000, more than 190 cases has
been notified to the dispute settlement process
31The Conduct of U.S. Commercial Policy
- Since 1934, Congress has authorized systematic
reduction in trade barriers. On the other hand,
Congress has provided American business with
alternative mechanisms for seeking and obtaining
relief from foreign competition. - In this section, we will discuss some of these
measures.
32Dumping
- It is defined as selling a product in a foreign
country at a price that is lower than the price
charged by the same firm in the home country.
33Economic Impacts of Dumping
PW
P1
P2
Predatory dumping
34Antidumping Law
- Current antidumping law provides that under
certain conditions, a special tariff be imposed
on foreign goods if it is found to be sold less
than fair value.
35Antidumping Cases Initiated Worldwide, 1999