Title: Mainstreaming Fair Trade
1Mainstreaming Fair Trade
- Fair trade brands the problem of ownership
- Dr. Anna Hutchens
- Director, Fair Trade Program,
- Centre for Governance of Knowledge Development,
Australian National University.
2Overview
- Mainstreaming fair trade in product and
principle? - Evolution in global food industry commodity-
to brand- based markets - Fair trade consumer markets a typology
- Analysing certification brands
- - empowering producers?
- - influence on conventional markets?
- Lessons
3 Evolution in global food industry commodity- to
brand- based markets
- Agriculture vital for development
-
- Causing poverty for small-scale primary commodity
producers - Buyer-driven supply chains control global markets
- Profit power located in ownership of
intangible assets
4Global value-chain analysis
- Level of competition at any stage of production
indirectly proportional to value return - Upgrading offers market actors a way to improve
their position by moving into less
competitive/higher value units of production - Most lucrative is own-brand manufacturing (OBM)
(a form of functional upgrading). Trade mark
rights underpinning brand offer ongoing
protection from competition
5Mainstreaming Fairtrade product certification
- 1989 - Max Havelaar established, adopted
across Europe - 1997 - Fairtrade Labelling Organisations
International (FLO) - Product certification enables any trader to
sell Fairtrade provided they meet trader criteria
(eg. sympathetic and traditional corporate
buyers) - Rapid market success (US1.4b, 25 growth p.a
over 5 yrs) - Trader Criteria
- A price covering the cost of production
- A social premium for development purposes
- Advance payments to assist farmers during
pre-harvest periods - Long-term contracts with producers to enable
long-term production planning - Long-term trading relations to allow stable
sustainable production planning
6Fair Trade Organisations the principles of fair
trade
- FTOs are first-movers in FT markets, share
broader vision of FT advocated by International
fair Trade Association (IFAT) - 1. Creating opportunities for economically
disadvantaged producers - 2. Transparency and accountability
- 3. Capacity building
- 4. Promoting Fair Trade
- 5. Payment of a fair price
- 6. Gender Equity
- 7. Working Conditions
- 8. Child Labour
- 9. The Environment
7Mainstreaming fair trade principles FTO brand
companies
- Distinctive breed of FTO fair trade brand
companies (eg. Divine Chocolate, Cafédirect,
Agrofair) - For-profit FTOs operating in highly concentrated
commercial markets
8Typology of fair trade consumer markets
eg. The Coop, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters
eg. Divine Chocolate, Cafédirect, Agrofair
eg. Ten Thousand Villages, GEPA,
eg. Nestle, Starbucks
Sympathetic Corporate-buyer Model /
FTO Brand Companies //
Corporate-buyer Model /
Standard FTO /
Expansionist FT
Reductionist FT
FLO label FTO standards Corporate
buyer-owned brand Producer co-ownership in
specialised-product brand
9FT certification
- Producer remuneration status still tied to
commodity production (low-value unit in
value-chain) - the dollar value of cocoa in a bar of chocolate
that costs 1 dollar is about eight cents. So you
can be paying a cocoa grower a fair wage with
respect to the local market, but the producer
is not actually able to capture the value that
their labour has directly and indirectly
generated because all the value happens further
down in the supply chain - its in the brand.
10FT certification (contd)
- FLOs funding growth model reinforces market
inequalities of economic power and scale - one of the major problems with the
greenwashing question is that FLO and Transfair
USA refuse to address it publicly.
Theirreasoning is obvious these companies doing
the damage provide most of the cash for their
operating budgets -
11FT certification (contd)
- Diminishing emphasis in trader requirements on
- Market access for small-scale producers, direct
trader-producer relations, investment in
capacity-building, long-term business
partnerships, political advocacy for trade
justice - Supermarket retailers can use label without
becoming licensees since they outsource packing
labelling. This potentially exposes producers to
conventional-market cost-cutting pressures
practices. - FLO offers no incentive for more highly
committed retailers (or traders) - its not all about volume and signing up more
MNCsSigning up more companies doesnt address
ideological issuesFLO needs to push companies
not just to address the price issue, but
fundamental issues of inequality in the supply
chainthats tough because its easy to ask a
company to write a cheque, but to hand over
power, I think thats where the challenge lies
12Fair Trade Brands
- - Producers receive fair trade price premium
- - Producers co-own the brand (company
shareholders, receive brand equity) - - Producers active in all (esp. value-added)
parts of business (sales, marketing, corporate
governance etc.) -
- - Producers benefit from FTO commitment to FT
partnerships - - Compete strategically through market-specific
brands
13Resistance and Game-playing
- Different approaches to democratising market
governance resistance game-playing - Each causes different effect on markets, with
implications for realising genuine change -
- Resistance causing symbolic imitation
(subversion of Fairtrade logo into no more than a
subsidiary brand for corporate actors who want to
use the label and profit from it) -
- Game-playing forces conventional firms to
compete on broader FT principles and practices
for survival
14Lessons
- FT certification system needs strengthening to
effectively manage and challenge corporate buyers - Fair Trade Brands represent ideal model for
mainstreaming fair trade both in terms of
producer-empowerment and changing
business-as-usual - Very few fair trade brand companies exist (esp.
outside Europe) - Power and significance of FTO brands poorly
acknowledged in FT consumer education, advocacy,
research - FTs entrepreneurial pioneers are crucial to FTs
survival in mainstream markets