Counterfactual Methods: Estimating Causal Effects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Counterfactual Methods: Estimating Causal Effects

Description:

If civilization is to survive, we must cultivate the science of human ... Question: Does fluoridation treatment reduce the incidence of dental caries? Target ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:309
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: utpubli
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Counterfactual Methods: Estimating Causal Effects


1
Counterfactual Methods Estimating Causal Effects
  • Confounding
  • Effect-measure modification
  • Quantifying bias

2
  • If civilization is to survive, we must cultivate
    the science of human relationships -- the
    ability of all peoples, of all kinds, to live
    together, in the same world at peace.
    Franklin D. Roosevelt
  • What we have to do... is to find a way to
    celebrate our diversity and debate our
    differences without fracturing our communities.
    Hillary Rodham Clinton
  • Confounding
  • Bias
  • Effect-measure modification
  • Interaction

3
Causal contrast - confounding
  • Present if substitute imperfectly represents the
    counterfactual
  • Association measure is confounded for a causal
    contrast due to imperfect substitution

4
Causal contrast - confounding
  • Scenario 1 (target experiences D1) confounding
    occurs if
  • Magnitude of confounding

5
Causal contrast - confounding
  • Scenario 2 (target experiences D0) confounding
    occurs if
  • Magnitude of confounding

6
Causal contrast - confounding
  • Scenario 3 (target experiences ? D1 or D0)
    confounding occurs if either
  • Magnitude of confounding

7
Causal contrast - confounding
  • Magnitude of confounding
  • If in any of the scenarios where the direct
    comparison is not equal (1,2) or the product (3)
    does not equal one, the ratio association measure
    (RRassociation) will be confounded for the causal
    contrast (RRcontrast)

8
Causal contrast - confounding
  • Control of confounding
  • Often considering several variables at one while
    keeping them distinct
  • Some measured, some not
  • Relevant to which variables are controlled,
    status as a confounder magnitude and direction
    of confounding can change considerably
  • If balanced out, control of one may actually
    lead to a greater order of magnitude of
    confounding

9
Causal contrast - confounding
  • Control of confounding
  • Depends on creating strata within which the
    no-confounding equalities are satisfied
  • Confounders
  • Factors that explain or produce confounding
  • Explains discrepancy between the counterfactual
    (desired but unobservable) and the substitute

10
Causal contrast - confounding
  • Example
  • Question Does fluoridation treatment reduce the
    incidence of dental caries?
  • Target
  • Population children in a community
  • Time period 3 years post-fluoridation treatment
    of water supply
  • Counterfactual argument
  • Substitute

11
Causal contrast - confounding
  • Example
  • Comparison of rate in year prior to fluoridation
    (t0-1yr) to rate at three years after
    fluoridation (t3) yields measure of effect or
    measure of association?
  • Hint do component rates refer to same or
    different population?
  • Confounding
  • Does substitute rate equal rate had exposure not
    occurred (counterfactual rate)?

12
Effect-measure modifier
  • Any factor that modifies the size of a ratio
    effect measure
  • Causal risk ratio varies from one population to
    another or from one time period to another in the
    same population
  • Consistency of risk ratio therefore not a valid
    causal criterion

13
Causal Types
  • Exposed Unexposed
  • Type 1 No effect - doomed 1 1
  • Type 2 Causative susceptible 1 0
  • Type 3 Preventive susceptible 0 1
  • Type 4 No effect - immune 0 0
  • 0 no disease (unaffected) 1 disease
    (affected)
  • Greenland Robins, IJE 15413-19, 1986
  • from Miettinen, Scand J Work Environ Health,
    121152-8, 1982

14
Effect-measure modification
  • Why can the size of the causal effect for a given
    pair of exposure distributions be different for
    different targets?
  • Definitions
  • Pdoomed proportion of individuals with disease
    regardless of exposure
  • Pcausative proportion of individuals who get
    disease if and only if exposed
  • Ppreventive proportion of individuals who get
    disease if and only if not exposed

15
Effect-measure modification
  • Proportion who get disease if exposed
  • Pdoomed Pcausative
  • Proportion who get disease if not exposed
  • Pdoomed Ppreventive
  • Causal risk ratio

16
Effect-measure modification
  • Any factor affecting Pdoomed, Pcausative, or
    Ppreventive can be an effect-measure modifier
    (modifies the size of a ratio effect measure)
  • Causal risk difference not dependent on Pdoomed
  • Therefore, only factors affecting proportions
    susceptible to exposure can modify causal risk
    difference

17
Quantification of effect-measure bias
  • Measures of association are surrogates for causal
    measures
  • How different are they?
  • Understanding this is a critical step in study
    interpretation
  • Formal evaluation (quantification) of bias
  • Sensitivity analysis
  • Validation substudies

18
Quantification of effect-measure bias
  • Counterfactual approach
  • RRexpected estimate
  • RRcausal?biascounfound?biasf/uloss?biassampling?bi
    asnonresponse?biasexclusion ?biasinfo
  • Result used in sensitivity analysis under
    different plausible scenarios
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com